PZ547
|
From the US
The father died. His eldest, prodigal, son returned to claim the father's assets, primarily the family farm
A younger son protested. He'd stayed to work the farm all through the eldest brother's come-and-go presence within the family. Father told me the farm would be mine upon his death, claimed the younger son. He said he was through with eldest son, who'd done nothing to keep the farm going. Now, my eldest brother has returned and presides over the family and farm while I am left nothing. I have worked this farm since I was a kid, every day, every month, every year. Now I have nothing to show for it. My father bequeathed this farm to me and now it's been taken from me by my layabout older brother
Time passed and the younger brother had a dream visit from his dad, who told him the farm was rightfully his, as promised
Younger son told his mother and other siblings about the dream. But of course, a dream is just a dream and wouldn't even get to court
While later, the deceased father visited his younger son again and repeated the farm was rightfully his. Find my last Will and Testament, said the father, and the law will have to take the farm from your useless older brother and give it to you
So they searched, the younger son and his mother and others, but they couldn't find the last Will which the father, in his dream visits, claimed to have written
More time passed and the father again visited his younger son in a dream, telling him the vital final Will was secreted in one of his old jackets
the family searched but could not find a jacket with a Will in it
Not sure if there was yet another dream in which the deceased father told his younger son to look in the attic of the farmhouse. In this way, an old jacket was discovered. But no Will was evident until one of the family, by unpicking the lining of the jacket, discovered the father's Will, bequeathing the farm to the younger son
The story claims there was a legal tussle over ownership of the farm, resulting in the younger son being granted ownership of the farm, per the father's last Will and Testament
I've read the above in a number of publications. Have also read several online debunkings, usually by religious conservatives who seem to become scared and aggressive when it's suggested the dead and the living can communicate
I lean toward the belief that the dead and living can communicate. Not saying it's commonplace, but there have been a handful of incidents even amongst people related to and close to me
After the World Wars, there were thousands of accounts of post-death contact from those who'd lost loved-ones in the battles
After WW2, Archbishop Cosmo Lang was driven by public outcry to call and preside over an enquiry into communication between the living and the departed. Most of the thousands of instances of this were unsolicited on the part of the living. In other words, their dead loved-ones initiated the contact and the contacts were various, consisting of full-body apparitions, or voice communication, scents used by the dead to identify themselves. At other times no apparation was visible, but the living heard the voice of their dead loved-one. There were also more subtle forms of contact, often being just a 'sense' that the deceased loved-one was present. Other instances consisted of moved objects, such as a photo of the deceased being moved from its place, or placed elsewhere. Vast variety of incidents where the living were convinced they'd been visited by the deceased
Thousands of people contacted their local clergy to report the incident/s. On occasion, they were told it was the work of the debil and evil spirits. But most of those who'd received contact were practical individuals who rejected the clergy's advice. What point would there be in the debil or evil spirits pretending to be my deceased husband. I know what I saw -- it was my husband or my son John or brother Gary. They asked nothing from me and simply wished to say hello, to give me comfort. Why would the debil and evil spirits go out of their way to bring me comfort? Because if they did, let's face it -- it's a damn sight more than the Ministry of Defence or the clergy have ever given me
The Church was losing favour with its automatic dismissal and denigration of the communication thousands believed have occurred between themselves and their loved-ones. The Wars had taken a heavy toll, wars no one had wanted. Millions lost and for what? And the Church point-blank refused to acknowledge that world carnage had resulted in some of the deceased managing to pierce the veil to say a final hello or bring a moment of comfort to the bereaved
Finally, the Church of England, under Archbishop Cosmo Lang, agreed to hold an enquiry into the possibility of after-death communication. They stacked the deck by choosing those opposed to the notion. But by the end of the lengthy enquiry, ten of the panel were forced by the evidence to acknowledge that it did appear the dead were able to contact the living. Out of the twelve panel members, two abstained, 'in the interest of balance', although it appeared clear that they too had privately been convinced by the evidence. The findings of the enquiry were withheld for many years, it's said, in the hope 'people would die' and the enquiry would be forgotten. I have a copy of the findings somewhere. Better than nothing. The Roman church refused to get involved
|