Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 
Send Topic Print
Labor's Election Plans Without The Spin (Read 6321 times)
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58177
Here
Gender: male
Re: Labor's Election Plans Without The Spin
Reply #90 - Feb 28th, 2019 at 8:17pm
 
Captain Nemo wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 7:35pm:
John Smith wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 6:46pm:
lee wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 6:02pm:
John Smith wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 5:50pm:
so if they're not distributed, how can they be shareholders income?


That share of profits that are distributed are income. However if you want Bill  to tell people that those distributions are NOT income, I am sure the shareholders will be very pleased. Wink


and the share of profits that is used to pay wages is called 'wages' and so on  and so on ..... so?
Company profits are NOT income.


The dividends to the shareholders (people) is income to them.

The whole problem with this Shorten / Bowen tax grab to deny low income recipients of franked dividends their tax return refund if they come in under the tax-free threshold is that it hits the low income retirees the hardest.

Some will lose 30% of their annual income.  Shocked

It is going to really hurt some retirees.

(Pensioners / part / pensioners) have since been exempted after the initial outcry, but those on low incomes not receiving any pension will be hurt by this.

That's why I am dead against it in its current form.




Some will lose 30% of their annual income.  Shocked

For this to be true 100% of their income would need to come directly from fully franked shares. The likelihood of this would be close to zero in fact it may not even be possible.

Estimates have been saying that it could cost an investor up to $3,000 (more likely less than half of that before any mitigation) This figure is not close to 30% of a self funded retirees income and in fact anyone in this position would be getting a substantial part pension to top them up to a normal pension rate.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Nemo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9935
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Labor's Election Plans Without The Spin
Reply #91 - Feb 28th, 2019 at 8:27pm
 
Yep, that's right, there will be some whose only source of income is fully franked dividends.

I for one, only invest in companies that pay fully franked dividends. It's "Blue Chip" companies for me every time.  Cool
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 28th, 2019 at 8:48pm by Captain Nemo »  

The 2025 election could be a shocker.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
crocodile
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6683
Gender: male
Re: Labor's Election Plans Without The Spin
Reply #92 - Feb 28th, 2019 at 8:35pm
 
John Smith wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 8:10pm:
crocodile wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 7:36pm:
Dnarever wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 7:16pm:
crocodile wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 6:41pm:
Dnarever wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 6:36pm:
crocodile wrote on Feb 27th, 2019 at 10:46pm:
Dnarever wrote on Feb 27th, 2019 at 9:20pm:
crocodile wrote on Feb 27th, 2019 at 9:19pm:
John Smith wrote on Feb 27th, 2019 at 8:20pm:
lee wrote on Feb 27th, 2019 at 7:36pm:
They have paid dividend imputation tax.



no, the COMPANY has paid it's taxes. The shareholders have paid nothing.

The shareholders own the company you colostomy bag.


They still payed no tax on their income


Horseshit. The company profit is their income.


They will be in a poo load of trouble when they put the company profit number in their personal tax return ?

But for them to do that you would need to be right ? Your not.

That's why there is an imputed credit attached to it. They just get a share of the profit. That's why they're called shareholders.


I guess to you putting words together in this sequence has some meaning. So now the company profit isn't their profit and They still never pay any tax on it  - not one cent.

You fukkin' brainless twat. They own the company. The company that they own withheld it for them. Income streams in this country don't get taxed twice.


once again, company's and shareholders are separate entities. Why do I have to keep repeating this for you?


You can repeat it forever. Still, you can't get it through your thick, stupid skull that
The shareholders own the company
Back to top
 

Very funny Scotty, now beam down my clothes.
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 83845
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Labor's Election Plans Without The Spin
Reply #93 - Feb 28th, 2019 at 8:44pm
 
crocodile wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 8:35pm:
You can repeat it forever. Still, you can't get it through your thick, stupid skull that
The shareholders own the company



Who cares - they still owe taxes...... personal income taxes separate from company taxes....

Pay your taxes, you lazy bludgers..... or pick up a shovel...

We could always pursue the idea that companies pay personal income tax rates, same as their workers, and then argue about the 'owners' of the company....

What is that top rate now... ummm.. 48% or 45?  Of gross ........

....and of course they could only cop the same deductions allowable as workers on PAYE...

Hmmm - this idea has merit.....   Tongue  Tongue  Tongue
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74262
Gender: male
Re: Labor's Election Plans Without The Spin
Reply #94 - Feb 28th, 2019 at 8:51pm
 
crocodile wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 8:35pm:
You can repeat it forever. Still, you can't get it through your thick, stupid skull that
The shareholders own the company


No one is disputing who owns the company

You've also in the past argued that we need to cut company tax.

Tell me, according to you, if shareholders pay the tax and not companies ... why bother lowering company tax?  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 28th, 2019 at 8:58pm by John Smith »  

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Nemo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9935
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Labor's Election Plans Without The Spin
Reply #95 - Feb 28th, 2019 at 8:56pm
 
If I may make a comment about lowering company tax ....

We have been experiencing record employment and record participation rates with the lower company taxes brought in by the Libs.

Companies employ more people when their costs are lower.

In America, where the company tax rates were massively cut ... record jobs growth again.

It's just a simple fact: lower taxes equals higher employment rates.  Cool
Back to top
 

The 2025 election could be a shocker.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74262
Gender: male
Re: Labor's Election Plans Without The Spin
Reply #96 - Feb 28th, 2019 at 8:57pm
 
Captain Nemo wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 8:56pm:
We have been experiencing record employment and record participation rates with the lower company taxes brought in by the Libs.



and record underemployment
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
crocodile
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6683
Gender: male
Re: Labor's Election Plans Without The Spin
Reply #97 - Feb 28th, 2019 at 9:39pm
 
John Smith wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 8:51pm:
crocodile wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 8:35pm:
You can repeat it forever. Still, you can't get it through your thick, stupid skull that
The shareholders own the company


No one is disputing who owns the company

You've also in the past argued that we need to cut company tax.

Tell me, according to you, if shareholders pay the tax and not companies ... why bother lowering company tax?  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



Because retained earnings is what drives productivity. Improvements to the capital / labour ratio is good for workers. Taxing it is a tax on wages.

For fukk sake, buy a textbook.
Back to top
 

Very funny Scotty, now beam down my clothes.
 
IP Logged
 
crocodile
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6683
Gender: male
Re: Labor's Election Plans Without The Spin
Reply #98 - Feb 28th, 2019 at 9:42pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 8:44pm:
crocodile wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 8:35pm:
You can repeat it forever. Still, you can't get it through your thick, stupid skull that
The shareholders own the company



Who cares - they still owe taxes...... personal income taxes separate from company taxes....

Pay your taxes, you lazy bludgers..... or pick up a shovel...

We could always pursue the idea that companies pay personal income tax rates, same as their workers, and then argue about the 'owners' of the company....

What is that top rate now... ummm.. 48% or 45?  Of gross ........

....and of course they could only cop the same deductions allowable as workers on PAYE...

Hmmm - this idea has merit.....   Tongue  Tongue  Tongue


You fukkin' drongo. The shareholders have to make up the difference between their marginal rate and the corporate rate. They still pay their full obligation.

Back to top
 

Very funny Scotty, now beam down my clothes.
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17330
Gender: male
Re: Labor's Election Plans Without The Spin
Reply #99 - Feb 28th, 2019 at 9:52pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 8:17pm:
Estimates have been saying that it could cost an investor up to $3,000 (more likely less than half of that before any mitigation)



Don't you just love averages. You can get them to mean anything you want. Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 20151
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Labor's Election Plans Without The Spin
Reply #100 - Feb 28th, 2019 at 10:06pm
 
The scheme was introduced to prevent double taxation....The taxpayer should not be subsidising anyone's personal income above the social security safety net....This must be reigned in!!!

Quote:
Keating introduced dividend imputation in 1987 to prevent the double taxation of dividends, once as company profits and once as personal income, and the Howard government then enhanced the scheme by allowing individuals and super funds to claim cash refunds for any excess imputation credits not used to offset their tax liabilities.

In a speech in Sydney on Tuesday, Shorten will characterise the current arrangements as “unsustainable largesse for high-income earners”, which, if left unchecked, will cost the budget “$8bn every single year”.

Shorten will argue the Howard government’s extension of the scheme “entirely distorts the original design of the dividend imputation system” and has left Australia as the only country in the OECD with a fully refundable dividend imputation credit system.

Australians will continue to be able to use imputation credits to reduce their tax liabilities, “but not to claim cash refunds”.


The age of entitlement is over....Pay your taxes you bastards!!!

Angry Angry Angry

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/mar/13/labor-to-axe-cash-refunds...
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17330
Gender: male
Re: Labor's Election Plans Without The Spin
Reply #101 - Feb 28th, 2019 at 10:17pm
 
philperth2010 wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 10:06pm:
Shorten will argue the Howard government’s extension of the scheme “entirely distorts the original design of the dividend imputation system” and has left Australia as the only country in the OECD with a fully refundable dividend imputation credit system.


The consensus argument. No one but us does it so it must be wrong. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Nemo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9935
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Labor's Election Plans Without The Spin
Reply #102 - Feb 28th, 2019 at 10:20pm
 
philperth2010 wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 10:06pm:
The scheme was introduced to prevent double taxation....The taxpayer should not be subsidising anyone's personal income above the social security safety net....This must be reigned in!!!

Quote:
Keating introduced dividend imputation in 1987 to prevent the double taxation of dividends, once as company profits and once as personal income, and the Howard government then enhanced the scheme by allowing individuals and super funds to claim cash refunds for any excess imputation credits not used to offset their tax liabilities.

In a speech in Sydney on Tuesday, Shorten will characterise the current arrangements as “unsustainable largesse for high-income earners”, which, if left unchecked, will cost the budget “$8bn every single year”.

Shorten will argue the Howard government’s extension of the scheme “entirely distorts the original design of the dividend imputation system” and has left Australia as the only country in the OECD with a fully refundable dividend imputation credit system.

Australians will continue to be able to use imputation credits to reduce their tax liabilities, “but not to claim cash refunds”.


The age of entitlement is over....Pay your taxes you bastards!!!

Angry Angry Angry

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/mar/13/labor-to-axe-cash-refunds...


That nails the whole problem ...


"Australians will continue to be able to use imputation credits to reduce their tax liabilities, “but not to claim cash refunds

Discriminates against the low income self-funded retirees.  Angry

Back to top
 

The 2025 election could be a shocker.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 20151
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Labor's Election Plans Without The Spin
Reply #103 - Feb 28th, 2019 at 10:24pm
 
Captain Nemo wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 10:20pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 10:06pm:
The scheme was introduced to prevent double taxation....The taxpayer should not be subsidising anyone's personal income above the social security safety net....This must be reigned in!!!

Quote:
Keating introduced dividend imputation in 1987 to prevent the double taxation of dividends, once as company profits and once as personal income, and the Howard government then enhanced the scheme by allowing individuals and super funds to claim cash refunds for any excess imputation credits not used to offset their tax liabilities.

In a speech in Sydney on Tuesday, Shorten will characterise the current arrangements as “unsustainable largesse for high-income earners”, which, if left unchecked, will cost the budget “$8bn every single year”.

Shorten will argue the Howard government’s extension of the scheme “entirely distorts the original design of the dividend imputation system” and has left Australia as the only country in the OECD with a fully refundable dividend imputation credit system.

Australians will continue to be able to use imputation credits to reduce their tax liabilities, “but not to claim cash refunds”.


The age of entitlement is over....Pay your taxes you bastards!!!

Angry Angry Angry

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/mar/13/labor-to-axe-cash-refunds...


That nails the whole problem ...


"Australians will continue to be able to use imputation credits to reduce their tax liabilities, “but not to claim cash refunds

Discriminates against the low income self-funded retirees.  Angry



Quote:
“$8bn every single year”


Yeah right!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17330
Gender: male
Re: Labor's Election Plans Without The Spin
Reply #104 - Feb 28th, 2019 at 10:27pm
 
philperth2010 wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 10:24pm:
In a speech in Sydney on Tuesday, Shorten will characterise the current arrangements as “unsustainable largesse for high-income earners”, which, if left unchecked, will cost the budget “$8bn every single year”.


That means the product he has to sell he has to "characterise" it. Grin Grin Grin


philperth2010 wrote on Feb 28th, 2019 at 10:24pm:
Quote:
“$8bn every single year”


Yeah right!!!



Just make it all double taxation that will suit you. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 
Send Topic Print