it_is_the_light wrote on Mar 4
th, 2019 at 5:35am:
What...
Mate, that's a copout if I've ever seen one. If you feel so strongly that it's Child Abuse or Child Exploitation Material then you're obligated to report it.
So the AFP, ACMA and the Australian Classification Board are Freemasons?
"all documented and recorded"
Yes it is, but what is documented is that your concern over this issue is bullshit otherwise you'd do something about it instead of making silly excuses to continue to string this along and throw even more accusations at posters.
Each time this has come up, you've done the same thing.
You pretend to be outraged so you can call others paedophiles then when you're given the means to do something about the issue, you cite conspiracy as to why you won't as if you're trying to perpetuate either the material or at least the argument.
A mod who would use the issue of Child Sex Abuse to win an argument on here? No thanks.
Your faux concern and faux outrage are documented and recorded for all to see ..
Again.
In case you change your mind and want to actually take action:
SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 22
nd, 2018 at 8:49am:
it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 22
nd, 2018 at 8:38am:
I have exposed how many people , you included , allow child pornography to be accepted .
Mate, for the last time, it's not child exploitation material,
it has an M rating.
If you think this is Child Exploitation Material I suggest you report it to
ACB or the
Federal Authorities.
You can even report it to the
eSafety Commissioner.
When you report the content via any of the methods above you're given tracking information to follow up with the complaints, I know, I've done it before. You can share that with us if you'd like to prove you've actually made the complaints, but you don't like providing proof of anything, so I suspect this won't happen.
There is also this,
SadKangaroo wrote on Feb 13
th, 2019 at 8:32pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Feb 13
th, 2019 at 8:19pm:
And I know this to be 100% true because I've just checked the links I posted and it seems that in quoting them the links broke and don't work.
Here are the links, for the last time.
Episode Rating: M LinkContact the Classification Board to complain about the ratingLinkHow to report suspicious behaviour onlineLinkReport offensive or illegal contentLink And then there is also FD's input on this,
freediver wrote on Apr 23
rd, 2018 at 12:36pm:
I am not going to censor stuff that is allowed on free to air television.
Especially South Park.
freediver wrote on Apr 22
nd, 2018 at 10:00am:
Light, that is not child pornography. Please stop hassling everyone about it.
It's been nearly a year and you're still going on about this.
From the forum point of view, because it's not been deemed Refused Classification, it's not going to be censored AND you've been asked to stop going on about this.
This leaves you the only recourse of contacting ACMA, or the ACB and have them investigate the episode all over again and see if they classify it any differently.
But you won't, because "freemasons".
Do you realise how stupid that is?
Or are you too scared to make a frivolous report, like your frivolous claims here, because there are real-world consequences for doing so to a federal body?
If nothing else, you've shown a disdain for those on here and for FD and in my opinion that's not a good look for a potential section mod.
So what now, will you take this issue further with the relevant authorities, or will you continue to exploit it and take no real action other than attacking people here and throwing out more false accusations on such a serious issue?