Brian Ross wrote on Mar 26^th, 2019 at 10:35pm:



So says, a person who proudly claims he has studied to receive a Doctorate (PhD) of Divinity no less
"...I do have a Doctor of Divinity"  CORRECTION, Yadda.


http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1487646898/242#242
Quote:



Perhaps brian is an advisor to Pappa Francis ???

Its not that far fetched.







And another poster, greggery, also made a 'claim', here on OzPol.

In 2016, he made a firm commitment to all other posters, that he would not post again on OzPol [he would leave OzPol], if DJ Trump were elected president of the U.S.A.  [so confident he was, that DJ Trump had no chance.]

Strangely, greggery, never did leave OzPol, and still posts here almost every day.              ????????

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1473874288/212#212



.



Exemplary moslems [imo], both of them.

Its a duck.

Quack, quack.

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 27^th, 2019 at 1:25pm:


It’s post-nominal ya dickhead. 

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 27^th, 2019 at 4:17pm:



Like you haven't been told for years.....

Frank wrote on Mar 26^th, 2019 at 8:48pm:


Malays are not a race.

Karnal wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 12:54pm:
You better let them know then, because not only do they consider themselves a race they have laws which perpetuate that belief. Google bumiputra.

rhino wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 9:45pm:


He is being ironic.

freediver wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 12:32pm:


surveys asking how open muslims are to different opinions on Islam, or their view of blasphemy laws - or even any surveys done in the wake of Ahok's gaoling as to how influential it was in determining how they publicly discuss Islam. That would be the most obvious way.

But you could also reference political representation in Indonesia as something resembling an indicative snapshot of society (and by extension their attitudes). Naturally though you will wisely steer clear of this one - as the Islamist extremists are resoundingly rejected in all spheres of Indonesian politics, in favour of secular parties.

It should be obvious that what is not acceptable for any kind of coherent argument, is to simply cite a single high profile example of someone being censored and declare that as the only thing required to prove the entire society is a self-censoring Islamofascist shithole.

freediver wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 12:32pm:


Thats called evidence FD. Thats how you conduct an argument - by backing up your claims with evidence, in this case an example. In case you are still unclear, this is the only attempt at evidence you have actually produced - and in fact isn't evidence at all, since you never linked the gaoling to any demonstrated behaviour of Indonesians society wide.

freediver wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 12:32pm:


Ah is that what you call it? Pointing out that you literally have nothing but a single high profile case (example) to substantiate your claim that Indonesia is a "shithole of oppression" - is a "quixotic attempt to avoid addressing the reality".

FD did you notice that your last 7 replies have consisted of nothing but "you're lying gandalf, so unfair you misrepresent me" - but not offering any refutation to the simple fact that this "argument" is indeed based on a single example? Its like you really really need to object to what I say - but don't actually have anything to refute. Strange.

Quote:


So the only evidence you would accept is evidence that does not exist?

Quote:


WTF would that prove?