Karnal wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 8:21pm:


I am not sure if you are referring to Anning or Tarrant. I believe Anning is on the defensive, having committed himself to comments he made in previous weeks. He cannot just contradict himself by changing his mind. It might be a welcome about-face to some. But, to most, it would be seen as a sign of weakness in philosophy.

I don't see Anning as having committed an act of self-defense in his comments over the last month. I cannot see Tarrant having any defense in court for his act of mass murder. He will have to rely on extreme psychological delusion to try and plead for a more comfortable bed.

Gnads wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 9:09pm:


And the 'privilege' is withdrawn.  Anning is welcome to fly with some other Carrier.

Gnads wrote on Apr 5^th, 2019 at 10:19am:


Anning is a racist, and not only because of what he said concerning NZ.  Why did Katter boot him?

Captain Caveman wrote on Apr 5^th, 2019 at 11:24am:



Yep thats why I don't watch Sky

Aussie wrote on Apr 5^th, 2019 at 10:39am:


Bob throwing him under the bus to protect his arze.... he's like minded or Anning wouldn't have been there.

Katter is not new to making controversial statements.

Karnal wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 8:13pm:

Anning didn't blame the victims. Nobody has ever blamed those 50 dead for their fate.
Anning said Muslim immigration into the West has brought this on. He echoed Powell whose prophesy this event - and many others - fulfilled. And both Powell and Anning are right insofar as nothing like this could happen in a Western country with no Muslim immigration.

He opened his statement by unequivocally rejecting the gunman's actions. 

Nobody is shooting up liberal democratic gatherings of immigrants or assimilated gatherings of immigrants. Standing aside, standing apart, standing against always DOES attract opprobrium. Not personal but group, tribal opprobrium. Happens everywhere all the time. This is no exception. Muslims attack and murder other Muslims who have a different view about Mo's rightful successor. 1400 years on. They have murdered far, far more people for that little disagreement than Tarrant or anyone of the suburban warriors could dream of.

You Muslims have been murdering each other and the kuffar for much less for 1400 years. Many, many Muslim in the West cultivate their apartness, more, their opposition, very conspicuously and purposefully. They relish sticking out like dogs' balls.  Anyone sticking out like that in THEIR countries is dealt with very, very harshly indeed.

This doesn't save the dead. but it does point out the rank hypocrisy of the survivors who mine the tragedy of their dead for base, grubby sectarian, anti-Western points. It shows up just what their interest in the event really is: spreading the lies about the innocent victimhood of the partisans of Submission.

Islam is neither innocent nor a victim.  That's all Anning tried to convey, in my reading of it.

John Smith wrote on Apr 5^th, 2019 at 7:08pm:

You are lying, dago.