The latest exciting news is that it may very soon be possible for surgeons to perform uterine transplants, so endowing a man who has ‘transitioned’ into being a strange approximation of a woman with the ability to gestate a child. And to give birth, after a fashion. The benighted child would need to be hacked out of the man’s midriff, because there’s not enough room down there for a child to come out naturally (yes, because he’s a man).

Sweden — the world leader in uterine transplants — is anxious to reclaim the title of the world’s most batshit crazy nation, which the Canadians and that simpering idiot Justin Trudeau currently have in their grasp. The uterus stuff will undoubtedly help. So, too, the fact that in some places, such as Gothenburg, transgendered women (i.e. men) are now allowed in women-only bathhouses and saunas — a policy that is comically at odds with the authorities’ desire to accede to the right of Muslim women to bathe without men being nearby.

[url]=https://www.spectator.com.au/2018/07/the-more-extreme-the-lefts-screeches-the-greater-the-populist-surge/This confluence of epic delusion plus politically correct doublethink would certainly convince me to give Sweden the coveted batshit award. [/url]


Nominations of other countries, with link to evidence of batshit craziness are invited (as is additional evidence of Sweden's eminence).

Do you know the government makes laws to keep public order?

Previously being gay was illegal, and it was used to establish social control, eg, that guy acts effeminate, that girl acts masculine, maybe they are homosexual, shun them, take them to a psychiatrist.

This forced people to conform. Everyone had to, even the non homosexuals. If you weren't a manly man there was something wrong with you. If you weren't a girly girl there was something wrong. Maybe you had "the vapors".

So people became concerned about their outward appearance, and gay's were persecuted, generally by those who had the most to hide, such as never married never had a girlfriend members of the Church.

This was normalised. No one wanted a sissy for a son.

Very strict definitions of normal behavior were defined. People were not allowed to express anything. They were not allowed to be different.

These people had these opinions that had the backing of the church, the police and the government.

Essentially they were self identifying with society by being an extension of government. That's where they felt they were. They were a "clandestine arm of the government" with government support as they were enforcing government policy.

Contrast this with the "secret Islamic police" and moral authorities in oppressive nations.

There is NO DIFFERENCE. The difference is the era.

Islamic moral police call people out in public, protest, have the assumed backing of the church and the government and the police.

It is exactly the same thing.

Now recall the government needs to mantain order. In order for a government to govern it needs power and authority.

By having people able to represent government authority without an official title, they are subverting the authority of the state.

So their whole place of origin is singled out for attack.

Gender identity disorder is no more. This is no longer a mental illness. Someone who wants to take hormones and grow a pair of tits and chop their balls off is no longer crazy. They changed this definition like very recently I think maybe five years ago.

THIS IS NOT NORMAL. THIS IS A SERIOUS ILLNESS. SOME PEOPLE FEEL LIKE POT PLANTS.

So now the "deep state" which historically has come from somewhere near the Church and related community groups, is going to have to realise it is now on the opposite end of the equation in regards to what society will tolerate. Laws are made to accommodate transgender people. Aren't gay's 10% of society and transgenders less than 1% of the LGBTI community? So 1 in 1000 people have these feelings. This is very rare. This affects no one. Most of them are going to have feelings of sexual expression, not desires to change their physiology. It would be stuff like a female expressing her desire to sexually dominate a female, or a male expressing his desire to sexually submit to a male and from this they deduce they are not homosexual but transgender. And out of that group, 1 in 1000 might want hormones. So now we have 1 on 100000 to 1 in 1000000 who may or may not transition.

And if you look at the statistics, most transgenders WILL fall in to the following categories:

Sex worker
Homeless
Drug Addict

That indicates some type of mental deficiency. Normal people adapt to society. These people can't. They also want to undergo surgery.

So, anyway, these people don't exist.

And if you mobilise politically against them, you are not enforcing government policy, you are out of step.

You start finding yourself alienated from government direction.

Does anyone else believe the government does things like this in secret to achieve a national security outcome, by preventing these people being interpreted by others as being a government "deep state apparatus"?

That transgender issues are being used to wrest power from religious conservative factions that in years past were essentially the anti communist religious secret police?

cods wrote on Apr 7^th, 2019 at 2:47pm:


Absolutely not, dear. This is wonderful news for our transgender mothers who, for generations, have had to suffer the indignity of being discriminated against and excluded from that most wondrous gift of all, the ability to sht out a foetus.

Procreative liberty is a thing. Not letting men gestate is an infringement of that right/liberty.  First, gay marriage. Now, men gestating. poo never ends, it only ever engulfs.



By making pregnancy potentially available to trans women and even to cis men (with hormone treatments), uterus transplants could challenge social norms and preconceptions, just as IVF has done by creating new family structures. But equally, by insisting on a particular route to motherhood these transplants could reinforce those norms and stereotypes, just as anthropologist Sarah Franklin has argued that anxieties about IVF have motivated social conformity in the way it is presented and practiced.

As a man, I know I will be sensitive to only a fraction of these currents. But I hope they can be discussed frankly, tolerantly and with compassion. Few issues are more emotive than conception and child-rearing – but that’s precisely because there are no easy answers.

• Philip Ball is a science writer
Of the Granuiad, of course.




See also learned articled here https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1471-0528.15438 and here https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30191067
There are others.

Well this should make the bat shyte crazy progressive left snicker with glee.