it is my opinion that the shaming of young men (and women for that matter) for wanting piles of cash and lots of sex is holding us back.

most young men , in particular have swallowed the social narrative that wanting lots of girls or cash is immoral and something they need to suppress .

but is it?

i hold that we are ALL ambitious in these 2 ,most important feilds.

and the pursuit of them , is the making of the superior man and without the "superior man" we are f**ked.

because, if you DO pursue these 2 things you will quickly discover the most important thing.

"taking" and "being selfish"  do not work.

the guys who crush it in business all get there eventually by serving others.
the guys who crush it with women are forced to master their emotions and become givers of good clean emotions and a source of expansive energy or they will fail.

let me say that again.

you will NOT get cash by taking and you will NOT get sex by taking.


these 2 things teach young men , more then anything ever could, to give and contribute because they will try the mainstream narrative of being a creepy little taker and they will fail and it will happen over and over until they learn to serve.

this is our great problem.

our politicians, our mainstream media, our social narrative all say that you take to get ahead.
it has never worked, it will never work and it can never work

until we encourage young men to "go for it" and 'take the lessons", we will continue to be what i call "crabs in a bucket".

we are all in the bucket and we see someone rising up to get out and we grab the guy with our nasty little selfish claws and drag him back down.

only when we start to heap praise on the guys who ARE doing well will we have learnt the lesson.

with the ascendancy of the beta male politician and the combined beta male / feminist in the mainstream media, this will never happen.

until it does, we will continue to live in ever increasing scarcity

I can't believe we have to go over this.

The aim of intelligence agencies is to have influence, control influence, and direct influence in their own nations and elsewhere in order to achieve social and political outcome.

To control and direct influence they are tasked with infiltrating and taking over rival and "subversive" groups where they can then control the opposition to do their bidding. They also recruit people to do their bidding either by manipulating them (eg controlling a group that influences them), by having them sympathetic to them or through blackmail.

Hollywood and the entertainment industry have MASSIVE amounts of influence all over the world. Hollywood is a target for infiltration by nations and entities desiring to control or subvert influence in America and elsewhere.

Therefore, it is obvious that the entertainment industry is an ongoing counter intelligence concern and therefore is completely controlled by the government.

The government uses the entertainment industry as a part of its intelligence apparatus. This is a given. This is not speculation.

Therefore, if you are influenced by and emulate pop culture, you are helping with transferring the values the intelligence agencies desire in to general society by acting as a multiplier.

And when someone equally a part of the intelligence apparatus, such as a journalist or media personality speaks out conservatively against these new values and creates points of division, the intelligence agency has successfully created influence, directed influence and divided society as they wanted to achieve a social outcome, either long term or short term.

This is done by the host government. It is called national security.

If a foreign government tried this in it would be called espionage or foreign interference or electoral interference.

The sexualisation of society may have the long term goal of encouraging hedonism and destroy the previous values of morality and chaste that were present until at least the 80's which were used to keep society docile by having fun pathologised or shunned.

By doing this, people will strive for less, be dumb horny and happy, complain less and therefore possibly be increased stability via less social unrest due to reduced wants and needs of items such as cars and expensive clothes, now replaced by flesh and gym bodies. This destroys "class inequality" as it becomes a value or desire not valued or desired. This has national security implications.

So essentially you are a wild animal and you are being socially engineered.

And later you need to vote to invade some country of brown people and watch them die because they have the internet and their ideas can now spread here and cause electoral interference which is a threat to the control intelligence agencies have over the herd.

Because remember, electoral interference is an outrage and Chinese people eat babies so we need to stop this electoral interference for Jesus.

Maybe the true path in the other extreme is Abstinence from sex and money and to work for food and fluid and seek what is 'free in life' from both people and oneself.
The life of a Swagman.
He who looked into the Billabong and the Billabong looked into him.

Striving for recognition for being virtuous and excellent is receiving praise for extreme conformity. Why should this be encouraged?

Sit. Good dog.

Jasin wrote on Apr 12^th, 2019 at 6:23pm:



The rule of the jungle is never look at the Billabong... or it might look back....

What would you rather see, dear? Sick people get access to health care?

Or Hillary fall down the stairs?

Karnal wrote on Apr 13^th, 2019 at 7:50pm:



Why don't you suck some other cock in Auburn, Paki-sucky.  For Allah. Do it for Allah. Allah likes people like you to suck for him.  Go and miam miam. You want to and you will.

Karnal wrote on Apr 14^th, 2019 at 11:39pm:


Frank is not feeling himself and being less than Frank. Frank is not at his best when not feeling himself.