Australian Politics Forum - Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #165 - Apr 29^th, 2019 at 3:14pm

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:57pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:56pm:

I think we can all agree that Fraser Anning is right.

A far right neo-Nazi, yes.

No - he's not a Nazi - he even said so.

You have to be a lot worse than even Anning to be a nazi/neo-nazi.

I believe the criteria for being a nazi requires both 1. a belief in racial superiority and 2. advocating actual violence to retain racial superiority.

Anning, to his credit, does not advocate violence, and therefore that alone disqualifies him as a nazi. He also doesn't directly advocate racial superiority - not openly anyway. Rather its just your bog standard white-victim narrative.

He does however actively court and seeks the support of actual nazis.

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103117
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #166 - Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:01pm

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 3:14pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:57pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:56pm:

I think we can all agree that Fraser Anning is right.

A far right neo-Nazi, yes.

No - he's not a Nazi - he even said so.

You have to be a lot worse than even Anning to be a nazi/neo-nazi.

I believe the criteria for being a nazi requires both 1. a belief in racial superiority and 2. advocating actual violence to retain racial superiority.

Anning, to his credit, does not advocate violence, and therefore that alone disqualifies him as a nazi. He also doesn't directly advocate racial superiority - not openly anyway. Rather its just your bog standard white-victim narrative.

He does however actively court and seeks the support of actual nazis.

No he doesn't -
Fraser Anning is our saviour.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 136426 Gender:	Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims. Reply #167 - Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:06pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:59pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:57pm: Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:56pm: I think we can all agree that Fraser Anning is right. A far right neo-Nazi, yes. No - he's not a Nazi - he even said so. Why do believe terrorists and neo-Nazis?
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136426
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #168 - Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:09pm

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 3:14pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:57pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:56pm:

I think we can all agree that Fraser Anning is right.

A far right neo-Nazi, yes.

No - he's not a Nazi - he even said so.

You have to be a lot worse than even Anning to be a nazi/neo-nazi.

I believe the criteria for being a nazi requires both 1. a belief in racial superiority and 2. advocating actual violence to retain racial superiority.

Anning, to his credit, does not advocate violence, and therefore that alone disqualifies him as a nazi. He also doesn't directly advocate racial superiority - not openly anyway. Rather its just your bog standard white-victim narrative.

He does however actively court and seeks the support of actual nazis.

Did you see the video of him punching a child?

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103117
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #169 - Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:36pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:09pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 3:14pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:57pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:56pm:

I think we can all agree that Fraser Anning is right.

A far right neo-Nazi, yes.

No - he's not a Nazi - he even said so.

You have to be a lot worse than even Anning to be a nazi/neo-nazi.

I believe the criteria for being a nazi requires both 1. a belief in racial superiority and 2. advocating actual violence to retain racial superiority.

Anning, to his credit, does not advocate violence, and therefore that alone disqualifies him as a nazi. He also doesn't directly advocate racial superiority - not openly anyway. Rather its just your bog standard white-victim narrative.

He does however actively court and seeks the support of actual nazis.

Did you see the video of him punching a child?

That wasn't a punch - just a couple of bitch slaps.

Back to top

IP Logged

Redmond Neck

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 21500
ACT
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #170 - Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:38pm

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:09pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 3:14pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:57pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:56pm:

I think we can all agree that Fraser Anning is right.

A far right neo-Nazi, yes.

No - he's not a Nazi - he even said so.

You have to be a lot worse than even Anning to be a nazi/neo-nazi.

I believe the criteria for being a nazi requires both 1. a belief in racial superiority and 2. advocating actual violence to retain racial superiority.

Anning, to his credit, does not advocate violence, and therefore that alone disqualifies him as a nazi. He also doesn't directly advocate racial superiority - not openly anyway. Rather its just your bog standard white-victim narrative.

He does however actively court and seeks the support of actual nazis.

Did you see the video of him punching a child?

That wasn't a punch - just a couple of bitch slaps.

Booby is into arse punching!

Grin

Back to top

BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS.

ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS!

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103117
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #171 - Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:46pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:38pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:09pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 3:14pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:57pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:56pm:

I think we can all agree that Fraser Anning is right.

A far right neo-Nazi, yes.

No - he's not a Nazi - he even said so.

You have to be a lot worse than even Anning to be a nazi/neo-nazi.

I believe the criteria for being a nazi requires both 1. a belief in racial superiority and 2. advocating actual violence to retain racial superiority.

Anning, to his credit, does not advocate violence, and therefore that alone disqualifies him as a nazi. He also doesn't directly advocate racial superiority - not openly anyway. Rather its just your bog standard white-victim narrative.

He does however actively court and seeks the support of actual nazis.

Did you see the video of him punching a child?

That wasn't a punch - just a couple of bitch slaps.

Bobby is into arse punching!

Grin

Red,
have you turned gay?
Just about all your comments have gay fantasies in them.
I suggest electro-aversion therapy.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136426
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #172 - Apr 29^th, 2019 at 5:49pm

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:09pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 3:14pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:57pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:56pm:

I think we can all agree that Fraser Anning is right.

A far right neo-Nazi, yes.

No - he's not a Nazi - he even said so.

You have to be a lot worse than even Anning to be a nazi/neo-nazi.

I believe the criteria for being a nazi requires both 1. a belief in racial superiority and 2. advocating actual violence to retain racial superiority.

Anning, to his credit, does not advocate violence, and therefore that alone disqualifies him as a nazi. He also doesn't directly advocate racial superiority - not openly anyway. Rather its just your bog standard white-victim narrative.

He does however actively court and seeks the support of actual nazis.

Did you see the video of him punching a child?

That wasn't a punch - just a couple of bitch slaps.

It was violence, against a child.

Anning is a violent neo-Nazi.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 103117 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims. Reply #173 - Apr 29^th, 2019 at 6:30pm greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 5:49pm: It was violence, against a child. Anning is a violent neo-Nazi. That little brat would have been knocked out if he egged me. Fraser Anning was very reserved.
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 74257 Gender:	Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims. Reply #174 - Apr 29^th, 2019 at 6:45pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:46pm: I suggest electro-aversion therapy. did it work for you?
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 44693
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #175 - Apr 29^th, 2019 at 7:06pm

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 28^th, 2019 at 6:05pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 28^th, 2019 at 10:44am:

A hijab - any funny costume - does not in itself attract hostility.

Yeah it does - just read my sig.

Frank wrote on Apr 28^th, 2019 at 10:40am:

The sri Lankan jihadist was radicalised by muslims already in Australia.

evidence? This was an IS attack, and I'm pretty sure all Aussie born IS recruits were radicalised online by people outside Australia.

1. 'in itself'. Hijab is the sign of jihad. Not innocent.

2. Get off Muslim Village as your source of what the world is like. Read the news the bomber was normal before he came to Oz. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/a-completely-changed-person-sri-lanka-bomber-radical...

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 103117 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims. Reply #176 - Apr 29^th, 2019 at 7:06pm John Smith wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 6:45pm: Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:46pm: I suggest electro-aversion therapy. did it work for you? Why would I need it? I'm a real man - not a poof.
Back to top	IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 47421
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #177 - Apr 29^th, 2019 at 8:52pm

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 3:14pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:57pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:56pm:

I think we can all agree that Fraser Anning is right.

A far right neo-Nazi, yes.

No - he's not a Nazi - he even said so.

You have to be a lot worse than even Anning to be a nazi/neo-nazi.

I believe the criteria for being a nazi requires both 1. a belief in racial superiority and 2. advocating actual violence to retain racial superiority.

Anning, to his credit, does not advocate violence, and therefore that alone disqualifies him as a nazi. He also doesn't directly advocate racial superiority - not openly anyway. Rather its just your bog standard white-victim narrative.

He does however actively court and seeks the support of actual nazis.

No way! You don't know crap!
I'm dobbing on you Gandalf. FD's gonna come and fix you up - just you wait and see. Even Karnal is going to give it a go. Pakistan is an Ally of Australia - because they play Cricket.

Nazism was Anti-Jew, not Anti-Moslem. Nazi's made Allies with many Moslems and nations.

Fraser Anning is seeking the aid of those who are NOT Nazi, but '___________' against Moslems, not against Jews.

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 136426 Gender:	Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims. Reply #178 - Apr 29^th, 2019 at 8:56pm John Smith wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 6:45pm: Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:46pm: I suggest electro-aversion therapy. did it work for you? Lol The answer to that is pretty obvious.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136426
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #179 - Apr 29^th, 2019 at 8:56pm

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 6:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 5:49pm:

It was violence, against a child.

Anning is a violent neo-Nazi.

That little brat would have been knocked out
if he egged me.
Fraser Anning was very reserved.

Have you physically assaulted children in the past?

Back to top

IP Logged

Poll
Question: Is a 17 year old a "child"?
Yes 4 (50.0%) No 2 (25.0%) Anyone who thinks so should be investigated 2 (25.0%) Total votes: 8 « Last Modified by: rhino on: Apr 30^th, 2019 at 11:17pm »