Australian Politics Forum - Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136426
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #210 - Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:40pm

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:03am:

rhino wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 9:49pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:09pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 3:14pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:57pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:56pm:

I think we can all agree that Fraser Anning is right.

A far right neo-Nazi, yes.

No - he's not a Nazi - he even said so.

You have to be a lot worse than even Anning to be a nazi/neo-nazi.

I believe the criteria for being a nazi requires both 1. a belief in racial superiority and 2. advocating actual violence to retain racial superiority.

Anning, to his credit, does not advocate violence, and therefore that alone disqualifies him as a nazi. He also doesn't directly advocate racial superiority - not openly anyway. Rather its just your bog standard white-victim narrative.

He does however actively court and seeks the support of actual nazis.

Did you see the video of him punching a child?

Fraser Anning did not assault a child.

He did, actually.

"In Australia children and young people are those under the age of 18 (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare - AIHW, 2018).

"The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child also defines a child as any human under the age of 18 years (United Nations, 1989)."

https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/publications/what-child-abuse-and-neglect#footnote-001

Why do you continue to defend this violent neo-Nazi?

yes, that is the technical legal definition of a child as used in a court of law.

There you go then.

Apology accepted.

Now, is the the first time you've defended someone who assaulted a child?

I'm curious.

Back to top

IP Logged

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #211 - Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:41pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:38pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 8:30pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 1:58pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:12am:

What a lot of rubbish,
egg boy didn't have a mark or a scratch on him
from anything that Fraser Anning did.
On the contrary - Anning had an egg smashed on his head.

That kid is lucky that Anning didn't knock him out.
Also - there is such a principle in law as a provoked attack.
You are allowed to fight back if you're attacked -
it's called self defense.

Egg Boy received a fat lip that required medical treatment. This qualifies as an injury.

This is the more serious charge of assault causing bodily harm.

That's the first I heard of that.

Have you defended people who assault children in the past?

Or, is this your first time?

Not a child, as I have shown.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136426
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #212 - Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:41pm

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:40pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:37pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:34pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 1:58pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:12am:

What a lot of rubbish,
egg boy didn't have a mark or a scratch on him
from anything that Fraser Anning did.
On the contrary - Anning had an egg smashed on his head.

That kid is lucky that Anning didn't knock him out.
Also - there is such a principle in law as a provoked attack.
You are allowed to fight back if you're attacked -
it's called self defense.

Egg Boy received a fat lip that required medical treatment. This qualifies as an injury.

This is the more serious charge of assault causing bodily harm.

Who has been charged? And BTW , you are wrong.

You're correcting me of all people?

A fat lip would be a minor injury and the charge (if any) would be common assault. Just ask me next time.

Assault of a child.

You condone that sort of thing, do you?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136426
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #213 - Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:42pm

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:41pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:38pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 8:30pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 1:58pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:12am:

What a lot of rubbish,
egg boy didn't have a mark or a scratch on him
from anything that Fraser Anning did.
On the contrary - Anning had an egg smashed on his head.

That kid is lucky that Anning didn't knock him out.
Also - there is such a principle in law as a provoked attack.
You are allowed to fight back if you're attacked -
it's called self defense.

Egg Boy received a fat lip that required medical treatment. This qualifies as an injury.

This is the more serious charge of assault causing bodily harm.

That's the first I heard of that.

Have you defended people who assault children in the past?

Or, is this your first time?

Not a child, as I have shown.

So, you've defended people who have assaulted adults?

Interesting.

Not surprising though.

Back to top

IP Logged

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #214 - Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:42pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:40pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:03am:

rhino wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 9:49pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 4:09pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 3:14pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:57pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:56pm:

I think we can all agree that Fraser Anning is right.

A far right neo-Nazi, yes.

No - he's not a Nazi - he even said so.

You have to be a lot worse than even Anning to be a nazi/neo-nazi.

I believe the criteria for being a nazi requires both 1. a belief in racial superiority and 2. advocating actual violence to retain racial superiority.

Anning, to his credit, does not advocate violence, and therefore that alone disqualifies him as a nazi. He also doesn't directly advocate racial superiority - not openly anyway. Rather its just your bog standard white-victim narrative.

He does however actively court and seeks the support of actual nazis.

Did you see the video of him punching a child?

Fraser Anning did not assault a child.

He did, actually.

"In Australia children and young people are those under the age of 18 (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare - AIHW, 2018).

"The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child also defines a child as any human under the age of 18 years (United Nations, 1989)."

https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/publications/what-child-abuse-and-neglect#footnote-001

Why do you continue to defend this violent neo-Nazi?

yes, that is the technical legal definition of a child as used in a court of law.

There you go then.

Apology accepted.

Now, is the the first time you've defended someone who assaulted a child?

I'm curious.

Using your own definition ,when you had sex with the 17 year old was that the first time you had sex with a child?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136426
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #215 - Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:43pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:41pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:40pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:37pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:34pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 1:58pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:12am:

What a lot of rubbish,
egg boy didn't have a mark or a scratch on him
from anything that Fraser Anning did.
On the contrary - Anning had an egg smashed on his head.

That kid is lucky that Anning didn't knock him out.
Also - there is such a principle in law as a provoked attack.
You are allowed to fight back if you're attacked -
it's called self defense.

Egg Boy received a fat lip that required medical treatment. This qualifies as an injury.

This is the more serious charge of assault causing bodily harm.

Who has been charged? And BTW , you are wrong.

You're correcting me of all people?

A fat lip would be a minor injury and the charge (if any) would be common assault. Just ask me next time.

Assault of a child.

You condone that sort of thing, do you?

Do you think it's okay to assault a child?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

Back to top

IP Logged

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #216 - Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:46pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:41pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:40pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:37pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:34pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 1:58pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:12am:

What a lot of rubbish,
egg boy didn't have a mark or a scratch on him
from anything that Fraser Anning did.
On the contrary - Anning had an egg smashed on his head.

That kid is lucky that Anning didn't knock him out.
Also - there is such a principle in law as a provoked attack.
You are allowed to fight back if you're attacked -
it's called self defense.

Egg Boy received a fat lip that required medical treatment. This qualifies as an injury.

This is the more serious charge of assault causing bodily harm.

Who has been charged? And BTW , you are wrong.

You're correcting me of all people?

A fat lip would be a minor injury and the charge (if any) would be common assault. Just ask me next time.

Assault of a child.

You condone that sort of thing, do you?

Do you think it's okay to assault a child?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

why do you think its ok to have sex with a child, i reckon thats probably a more important question.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136426
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #217 - Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:47pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:41pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:40pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:37pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:34pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 1:58pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:12am:

What a lot of rubbish,
egg boy didn't have a mark or a scratch on him
from anything that Fraser Anning did.
On the contrary - Anning had an egg smashed on his head.

That kid is lucky that Anning didn't knock him out.
Also - there is such a principle in law as a provoked attack.
You are allowed to fight back if you're attacked -
it's called self defense.

Egg Boy received a fat lip that required medical treatment. This qualifies as an injury.

This is the more serious charge of assault causing bodily harm.

Who has been charged? And BTW , you are wrong.

You're correcting me of all people?

A fat lip would be a minor injury and the charge (if any) would be common assault. Just ask me next time.

Assault of a child.

You condone that sort of thing, do you?

Do you think it's okay to assault a child?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

So ...

Or, let's go down another path.

Have you ever assaulted a child?

Back to top

IP Logged

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #218 - Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:50pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:41pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:40pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:37pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:34pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 1:58pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:12am:

What a lot of rubbish,
egg boy didn't have a mark or a scratch on him
from anything that Fraser Anning did.
On the contrary - Anning had an egg smashed on his head.

That kid is lucky that Anning didn't knock him out.
Also - there is such a principle in law as a provoked attack.
You are allowed to fight back if you're attacked -
it's called self defense.

Egg Boy received a fat lip that required medical treatment. This qualifies as an injury.

This is the more serious charge of assault causing bodily harm.

Who has been charged? And BTW , you are wrong.

You're correcting me of all people?

A fat lip would be a minor injury and the charge (if any) would be common assault. Just ask me next time.

Assault of a child.

You condone that sort of thing, do you?

Do you think it's okay to assault a child?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

So ...

Or, let's go down another path.

Have you ever assaulted a child?

Why did you have sex with someone you consider a child? i think the forum is learning a little about you here.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136426
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #219 - Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:52pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:41pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:40pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:37pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:34pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 1:58pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:12am:

What a lot of rubbish,
egg boy didn't have a mark or a scratch on him
from anything that Fraser Anning did.
On the contrary - Anning had an egg smashed on his head.

That kid is lucky that Anning didn't knock him out.
Also - there is such a principle in law as a provoked attack.
You are allowed to fight back if you're attacked -
it's called self defense.

Egg Boy received a fat lip that required medical treatment. This qualifies as an injury.

This is the more serious charge of assault causing bodily harm.

Who has been charged? And BTW , you are wrong.

You're correcting me of all people?

A fat lip would be a minor injury and the charge (if any) would be common assault. Just ask me next time.

Assault of a child.

You condone that sort of thing, do you?

Do you think it's okay to assault a child?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

So ...

Or, let's go down another path.

Have you ever assaulted a child?

Seeing as you won't answer the question, is it safe to assume that you have assaulted a child?

Should we now ask, how many?

Back to top

IP Logged

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #220 - Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:57pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:41pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:40pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:37pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:34pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 1:58pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:12am:

What a lot of rubbish,
egg boy didn't have a mark or a scratch on him
from anything that Fraser Anning did.
On the contrary - Anning had an egg smashed on his head.

That kid is lucky that Anning didn't knock him out.
Also - there is such a principle in law as a provoked attack.
You are allowed to fight back if you're attacked -
it's called self defense.

Egg Boy received a fat lip that required medical treatment. This qualifies as an injury.

This is the more serious charge of assault causing bodily harm.

Who has been charged? And BTW , you are wrong.

You're correcting me of all people?

A fat lip would be a minor injury and the charge (if any) would be common assault. Just ask me next time.

Assault of a child.

You condone that sort of thing, do you?

Do you think it's okay to assault a child?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

So ...

Or, let's go down another path.

Have you ever assaulted a child?

Seeing as you won't answer the question, is it safe to assume that you have assaulted a child?

Should we now ask, how many?

well that would be slander as I have stated no such thing. You however have stated that
1. A 17 year old is a child
2. You have had sex with a 17 year old.
Why do you think it is ok to have sex with someone you consider a child. ? Simple question.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136426
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #221 - Apr 30^th, 2019 at 10:00pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:41pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:40pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:37pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:34pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 1:58pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:12am:

What a lot of rubbish,
egg boy didn't have a mark or a scratch on him
from anything that Fraser Anning did.
On the contrary - Anning had an egg smashed on his head.

That kid is lucky that Anning didn't knock him out.
Also - there is such a principle in law as a provoked attack.
You are allowed to fight back if you're attacked -
it's called self defense.

Egg Boy received a fat lip that required medical treatment. This qualifies as an injury.

This is the more serious charge of assault causing bodily harm.

Who has been charged? And BTW , you are wrong.

You're correcting me of all people?

A fat lip would be a minor injury and the charge (if any) would be common assault. Just ask me next time.

Assault of a child.

You condone that sort of thing, do you?

Do you think it's okay to assault a child?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

So ...

Or, let's go down another path.

Have you ever assaulted a child?

Seeing as you won't answer the question, is it safe to assume that you have assaulted a child?

Should we now ask, how many?

More than two, but less than ten?

I'm talking about the number of children, not their age.

Back to top

IP Logged

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #222 - Apr 30^th, 2019 at 10:11pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 10:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:41pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:40pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:37pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:34pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 1:58pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:12am:

What a lot of rubbish,
egg boy didn't have a mark or a scratch on him
from anything that Fraser Anning did.
On the contrary - Anning had an egg smashed on his head.

That kid is lucky that Anning didn't knock him out.
Also - there is such a principle in law as a provoked attack.
You are allowed to fight back if you're attacked -
it's called self defense.

Egg Boy received a fat lip that required medical treatment. This qualifies as an injury.

This is the more serious charge of assault causing bodily harm.

Who has been charged? And BTW , you are wrong.

You're correcting me of all people?

A fat lip would be a minor injury and the charge (if any) would be common assault. Just ask me next time.

Assault of a child.

You condone that sort of thing, do you?

Do you think it's okay to assault a child?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

So ...

Or, let's go down another path.

Have you ever assaulted a child?

Seeing as you won't answer the question, is it safe to assume that you have assaulted a child?

Should we now ask, how many?

More than two, but less than ten?

I'm talking about the number of children, not their age.

Why did you have sex with someone you consider a child? Was this forced sex? Was this anal sex as you so frequently boast about? I think you need to come clean on this.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136426
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #223 - Apr 30^th, 2019 at 10:13pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 10:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:41pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:40pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:37pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:34pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 1:58pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:12am:

What a lot of rubbish,
egg boy didn't have a mark or a scratch on him
from anything that Fraser Anning did.
On the contrary - Anning had an egg smashed on his head.

That kid is lucky that Anning didn't knock him out.
Also - there is such a principle in law as a provoked attack.
You are allowed to fight back if you're attacked -
it's called self defense.

Egg Boy received a fat lip that required medical treatment. This qualifies as an injury.

This is the more serious charge of assault causing bodily harm.

Who has been charged? And BTW , you are wrong.

You're correcting me of all people?

A fat lip would be a minor injury and the charge (if any) would be common assault. Just ask me next time.

Assault of a child.

You condone that sort of thing, do you?

Do you think it's okay to assault a child?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

So ...

Or, let's go down another path.

Have you ever assaulted a child?

Seeing as you won't answer the question, is it safe to assume that you have assaulted a child?

Should we now ask, how many?

More than two, but less than ten?

I'm talking about the number of children, not their age.

More than ten?

Back to top

IP Logged

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #224 - Apr 30^th, 2019 at 10:18pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 10:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:41pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:40pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:37pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:34pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 1:58pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:12am:

What a lot of rubbish,
egg boy didn't have a mark or a scratch on him
from anything that Fraser Anning did.
On the contrary - Anning had an egg smashed on his head.

That kid is lucky that Anning didn't knock him out.
Also - there is such a principle in law as a provoked attack.
You are allowed to fight back if you're attacked -
it's called self defense.

Egg Boy received a fat lip that required medical treatment. This qualifies as an injury.

This is the more serious charge of assault causing bodily harm.

Who has been charged? And BTW , you are wrong.

You're correcting me of all people?

A fat lip would be a minor injury and the charge (if any) would be common assault. Just ask me next time.

Assault of a child.

You condone that sort of thing, do you?

Do you think it's okay to assault a child?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

So ...

Or, let's go down another path.

Have you ever assaulted a child?

Seeing as you won't answer the question, is it safe to assume that you have assaulted a child?

Should we now ask, how many?

More than two, but less than ten?

I'm talking about the number of children, not their age.

The other thing I would like to point to any Moderator who may be viewing this thread, pecca is altering my posts to attempt to change context and appears to be trying to make it appear I am replying to another poster instead of him. . This is clearly a breach of the rules.

Back to top

IP Logged

Poll
Question: Is a 17 year old a "child"?
Yes 4 (50.0%) No 2 (25.0%) Anyone who thinks so should be investigated 2 (25.0%) Total votes: 8 « Last Modified by: rhino on: Apr 30^th, 2019 at 11:17pm »