Australian Politics Forum - Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20493
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #240 - May 1^st, 2019 at 8:29am

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 10:21pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 10:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 10:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:41pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:40pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:37pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:34pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 1:58pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:12am:

What a lot of rubbish,
egg boy didn't have a mark or a scratch on him
from anything that Fraser Anning did.
On the contrary - Anning had an egg smashed on his head.

That kid is lucky that Anning didn't knock him out.
Also - there is such a principle in law as a provoked attack.
You are allowed to fight back if you're attacked -
it's called self defense.

Egg Boy received a fat lip that required medical treatment. This qualifies as an injury.

This is the more serious charge of assault causing bodily harm.

Who has been charged? And BTW , you are wrong.

You're correcting me of all people?

A fat lip would be a minor injury and the charge (if any) would be common assault. Just ask me next time.

Assault of a child.

You condone that sort of thing, do you?

Do you think it's okay to assault a child?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

So ...

Or, let's go down another path.

Have you ever assaulted a child?

Seeing as you won't answer the question, is it safe to assume that you have assaulted a child?

Should we now ask, how many?

More than two, but less than ten?

I'm talking about the number of children, not their age.

More than ten?

]Why did you have sex with someone you consider a child? Was this forced sex? Was this anal sex as you so frequently boast about? I think you need to come clean on this. Why wont you answer this? Not looking good for you here, all you need is to refute your previous claims you had sex with a child. I urge you to set the record straight.

Interesting.

Greggy suggests the reason Bobby makes so many posts about homosexuals is because he's a closet homosexual.

What happens if we use this very same logic to question why every single day Greg posts about Donal Trump being a child rapist?

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136426
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #241 - May 1^st, 2019 at 8:30am

Gordon wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 8:29am:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 10:21pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 10:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 10:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:41pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:40pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:37pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 9:34pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 1:58pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:12am:

What a lot of rubbish,
egg boy didn't have a mark or a scratch on him
from anything that Fraser Anning did.
On the contrary - Anning had an egg smashed on his head.

That kid is lucky that Anning didn't knock him out.
Also - there is such a principle in law as a provoked attack.
You are allowed to fight back if you're attacked -
it's called self defense.

Egg Boy received a fat lip that required medical treatment. This qualifies as an injury.

This is the more serious charge of assault causing bodily harm.

Who has been charged? And BTW , you are wrong.

You're correcting me of all people?

A fat lip would be a minor injury and the charge (if any) would be common assault. Just ask me next time.

Assault of a child.

You condone that sort of thing, do you?

Do you think it's okay to assault a child?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

So ...

Or, let's go down another path.

Have you ever assaulted a child?

Seeing as you won't answer the question, is it safe to assume that you have assaulted a child?

Should we now ask, how many?

More than two, but less than ten?

I'm talking about the number of children, not their age.

More than ten?

]Why did you have sex with someone you consider a child? Was this forced sex? Was this anal sex as you so frequently boast about? I think you need to come clean on this. Why wont you answer this? Not looking good for you here, all you need is to refute your previous claims you had sex with a child. I urge you to set the record straight.

Interesting.

Greggy suggests the reason Bobby makes so many posts about homosexuals is because he's a closet homosexual.

What happens if we use this very same logic to question why every single day Greg posts about Donal Trump being a child rapist?

Is Donald Trump a child rapist?

Back to top

IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #242 - May 1^st, 2019 at 8:43am

freediver wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 1:47pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:49pm:

freediver wrote on Apr 28^th, 2019 at 8:52pm:

It is the opposite Gandalf. The strongest evidence for Islam being the greatest modern threat to freedom and demcoracy is what it has done to people in Muslim majority nations. As you like to point out, most of Islams victims are Muslims.

I feel I need to point that out FD, because you continue to dehumanize all muslims, and lump them all in the same basket. You need reminding that many muslims are actually fighting for freedom and democracy in the name of Islam - and many of them die for their beliefs. Who knew - an Islam that stands up for freedom and democracy? Yet rather than support them (as you did pre 2007), you mock and ridicule them, and dismiss them as no different to the people that are attacking and killing them.

Yes Gandalf I can appreciate the irony. If Hitler had won, do you think there would be any freedom-promoting Nazis yet?

Probably, but thats not the point. The point is Nazism wasn't born specifically as a means of spiritual advancement through the worship of the one Abrahamic God. It didn't have as its most central pillars acts and behaviors specifically related to, and only to, personal spiritual fulfillment (prayer, alms giving, fasting, belief in oneness of God and pilgrimage - none of which has anything to do with hostility or violence towards other humans).

Rather it was pretty much restricted to adherence to a purely temporal, political doctrine of racial superiority and hatred towards inferior races.

If Nazism produced peace loving, non-prejudiced strains it would be in spite of its doctrine, whereas peace and goodwill - and freedom for that matter - is literally adhering directly to the core tenants of Islam. A point that the vast majority of muslims understand, and frequently die because of it.

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103117
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #243 - May 1^st, 2019 at 12:26pm

cods wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 8:24am:

Bobby. wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 7:45am:

cods wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 7:29am:

bobby I cant even be bothered answering your stupid questions.....

They are fair questions.
You want to judge others but you
won't say what you would have done.

forgiven
namaste

first I would have found out what the hell hit me......

in that split second someone would have taken charge of the situation assuming I am a member of the Senate......as for greg ask him yourself..

Nice side step Cods,
so you'd let others beat him up?
They would do your dirty work for you.

forgiven
namaste

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 44693
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #244 - May 1^st, 2019 at 6:59pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 9:17pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 9:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 8:56pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 6:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 5:49pm:

It was violence, against a child.

Anning is a violent neo-Nazi.

That little brat would have been knocked out
if he egged me.
Fraser Anning was very reserved.

Have you physically assaulted children in the past?

'children', says the 14 year old turd.

Anning assaulted a child.

That's a simple, irrefutable fact.

Now Bobby is saying that he would have assaulted that child too.

What about you - would you assault a child?

Oh, fck off you stupid bloody idiot. You and your idiotic 'yeah, but would you assault a child/non Mohammedans are the worst terrorist threat/I leave if Trump wins....' etc.

You are an insufferable frakin' bent retard. Which is exactly what you enjoy being. The eternal blind idiot across the ages.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 44693
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #245 - May 1^st, 2019 at 7:18pm

Karnal wrote on Apr 27^th, 2019 at 7:49pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 27^th, 2019 at 7:40pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 27^th, 2019 at 7:28pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 27^th, 2019 at 6:36pm:

Bowl of skittles - 20% are poisonous and there is no way to tell them apart at entry.

Therefore we must ban them all - to be safe.

Sorry Frank, its not an option.

The only acceptable solution is to get better at telling the dangerous ones from the safe ones.

Tell us how to do that. Go on. They all share the koran and mohammed. Where's the diff?

School us.

At least you've given up your mendacity about being somehow able to spot the difference between Whitey and his vanguard of White Supremacists.

Superior culture, innit.

I think anyone who takes Islam to heart and allows it to be the guide of his life is objectively short-changing himself intellectually, psychologically, emotionally. He chooses to be an underground, mouse man. He chooses to blocks light and fresh air from his life.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 44693
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #246 - May 1^st, 2019 at 7:44pm

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 28^th, 2019 at 6:05pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 28^th, 2019 at 10:44am:

A hijab - any funny costume - does not in itself attract hostility.

Yeah it does - just read my sig.

Frank wrote on Apr 28^th, 2019 at 10:40am:

The sri Lankan jihadist was radicalised by muslims already in Australia.

evidence? This was an IS attack, and I'm pretty sure all Aussie born IS recruits were radicalised online by people outside Australia.

Sri Lanka bans clothing covering the face
A week after Sri Lankan suicide bombers left more than 250 people dead, the reeling nation has banned all kinds of face clothing.

ISLAMOPHOBIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95295
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #247 - May 1^st, 2019 at 7:48pm

Bobby. wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 5:06am:

cods wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 7:57am:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:12am:

What a lot of rubbish,
egg boy didn't have a mark or a scratch on him
from anything that Fraser Anning did.
On the contrary - Anning had an egg smashed on his head.

That kid is lucky that Anning didn't knock him out.
Also - there is such a principle in law as a provoked attack.
You are allowed to fight back if you're attacked -
it's called self defense.

we are talking about an elected member of the senate.....and yes he did unlawfully touch that BOY...he lashed out instantly egg boy was hit twice by anning and then his henchmen stepped in...

I dont agree for one moment with what the boy did....but anning didnt hesitate didnt even try to see what hit him just instant lash out....

he btw is the grown up...he would know by now where ever he goes he attract controversy..

did he assault the fan who attacked the photographer?... NO he didnt.....and that was even worse... the photographer was going to to the aid of a female.. Angry

Cods,
what would you have done if
that brat had smashed an egg on your head?

What would poofy Greggy have done?
Hit him with his hand bag?

I would have taught that kid some manners, son.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #248 - May 1^st, 2019 at 7:55pm

Karnal wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 7:48pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 5:06am:

cods wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 7:57am:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:12am:

What a lot of rubbish,
egg boy didn't have a mark or a scratch on him
from anything that Fraser Anning did.
On the contrary - Anning had an egg smashed on his head.

That kid is lucky that Anning didn't knock him out.
Also - there is such a principle in law as a provoked attack.
You are allowed to fight back if you're attacked -
it's called self defense.

we are talking about an elected member of the senate.....and yes he did unlawfully touch that BOY...he lashed out instantly egg boy was hit twice by anning and then his henchmen stepped in...

I dont agree for one moment with what the boy did....but anning didnt hesitate didnt even try to see what hit him just instant lash out....

he btw is the grown up...he would know by now where ever he goes he attract controversy..

did he assault the fan who attacked the photographer?... NO he didnt.....and that was even worse... the photographer was going to to the aid of a female.. Angry

Cods,
what would you have done if
that brat had smashed an egg on your head?

What would poofy Greggy have done?
Hit him with his hand bag?

I would have taught that kid some manners, son.

Karnal- Now you know that was wrong! Go and sit in the naughty corner for 5 minutes you bad boy!!! Kiss

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95295
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #249 - May 1^st, 2019 at 8:29pm

Mr Hammer wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 7:55pm:

Karnal wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 7:48pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 5:06am:

cods wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 7:57am:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 6:12am:

What a lot of rubbish,
egg boy didn't have a mark or a scratch on him
from anything that Fraser Anning did.
On the contrary - Anning had an egg smashed on his head.

That kid is lucky that Anning didn't knock him out.
Also - there is such a principle in law as a provoked attack.
You are allowed to fight back if you're attacked -
it's called self defense.

we are talking about an elected member of the senate.....and yes he did unlawfully touch that BOY...he lashed out instantly egg boy was hit twice by anning and then his henchmen stepped in...

I dont agree for one moment with what the boy did....but anning didnt hesitate didnt even try to see what hit him just instant lash out....

he btw is the grown up...he would know by now where ever he goes he attract controversy..

did he assault the fan who attacked the photographer?... NO he didnt.....and that was even worse... the photographer was going to to the aid of a female.. Angry

Cods,
what would you have done if
that brat had smashed an egg on your head?

What would poofy Greggy have done?
Hit him with his hand bag?

I would have taught that kid some manners, son.

Karnal- Now you know that was wrong! Go and sit in the naughty corner for 5 minutes you bad boy!!! Kiss

How's your manners going there, Homo?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136426
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #250 - May 1^st, 2019 at 9:01pm

Frank wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 6:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 9:17pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 9:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 8:56pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 6:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 5:49pm:

It was violence, against a child.

Anning is a violent neo-Nazi.

That little brat would have been knocked out
if he egged me.
Fraser Anning was very reserved.

Have you physically assaulted children in the past?

'children', says the 14 year old turd.

Anning assaulted a child.

That's a simple, irrefutable fact.

Now Bobby is saying that he would have assaulted that child too.

What about you - would you assault a child?

Oh, fck off you stupid bloody idiot. You and your idiotic 'yeah, but would you assault a child/non Mohammedans are the worst terrorist threat/I leave if Trump wins....' etc.

You are an insufferable frakin' bent retard. Which is exactly what you enjoy being. The eternal blind idiot across the ages.

Do you condone child abuse?

I'm curious.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 47421 Gender:	Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims. Reply #251 - May 1^st, 2019 at 9:59pm Child: 0 - 19 years of Age. Teenagers are NOT 'young adults' as the Writing Industry like's to flatter in their pursuit for the $$ market in youth.
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #252 - May 1^st, 2019 at 11:13pm

Bobby. wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 12:26pm:

cods wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 8:24am:

Bobby. wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 7:45am:

cods wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 7:29am:

bobby I cant even be bothered answering your stupid questions.....

They are fair questions.
You want to judge others but you
won't say what you would have done.

forgiven
namaste

first I would have found out what the hell hit me......

in that split second someone would have taken charge of the situation assuming I am a member of the Senate......as for greg ask him yourself..

Nice side step Cods,
so you'd let others beat him up?
They would do your dirty work for you.

forgiven
namaste

what a stupid thing to say..

he has minders dummy! he knows hes a target...

and they dont beat people up... as you saw that boy was completely out numbered....and I believe unhurt.. he has apologised he knows it wasnt a smart thing to do...

the boy that is... nothing from the other pillock..

to think that man is on my voting ticket......the Anning Party what the hell are we coming too....

talk about ridiculous.....some people fall for anything..

between him and Palmer we are sitting ducks.. Angry

... ones a thief the other a racist

good one Australia.. Angry

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103117
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #253 - May 1^st, 2019 at 11:27pm

cods wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 11:13pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 12:26pm:

cods wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 8:24am:

Bobby. wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 7:45am:

cods wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 7:29am:

bobby I cant even be bothered answering your stupid questions.....

They are fair questions.
You want to judge others but you
won't say what you would have done.

forgiven
namaste

first I would have found out what the hell hit me......

in that split second someone would have taken charge of the situation assuming I am a member of the Senate......as for greg ask him yourself..

Nice side step Cods,
so you'd let others beat him up?
They would do your dirty work for you.

forgiven
namaste

what a stupid thing to say..

he has minders dummy! he knows hes a target...

and they dont beat people up... as you saw that boy was completely out numbered....and I believe unhurt.. he has apologised he knows it wasnt a smart thing to do...

the boy that is... nothing from the other pillock..

to think that man is on my voting ticket......the Anning Party what the hell are we coming too....

talk about ridiculous.....some people fall for anything..

between him and Palmer we are sitting ducks.. Angry

... ones a thief the other a racist

good one Australia.. Angry

And I have a feeling that Anning, Palmer and Pauline
will have a big say in the Senate.
People have lost trust with the 2 major parties.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.

Re: Fraser Anning speaks out against Muslims.
Reply #254 - May 2^nd, 2019 at 12:30pm

polite_gandalf wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 8:43am:

freediver wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 1:47pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 29^th, 2019 at 2:49pm:

freediver wrote on Apr 28^th, 2019 at 8:52pm:

It is the opposite Gandalf. The strongest evidence for Islam being the greatest modern threat to freedom and demcoracy is what it has done to people in Muslim majority nations. As you like to point out, most of Islams victims are Muslims.

I feel I need to point that out FD, because you continue to dehumanize all muslims, and lump them all in the same basket. You need reminding that many muslims are actually fighting for freedom and democracy in the name of Islam - and many of them die for their beliefs. Who knew - an Islam that stands up for freedom and democracy? Yet rather than support them (as you did pre 2007), you mock and ridicule them, and dismiss them as no different to the people that are attacking and killing them.

Yes Gandalf I can appreciate the irony. If Hitler had won, do you think there would be any freedom-promoting Nazis yet?

Probably, but thats not the point. The point is Nazism wasn't born specifically as a means of spiritual advancement through the worship of the one Abrahamic God. It didn't have as its most central pillars acts and behaviors specifically related to, and only to, personal spiritual fulfillment (prayer, alms giving, fasting, belief in oneness of God and pilgrimage - none of which has anything to do with hostility or violence towards other humans).

Rather it was pretty much restricted to adherence to a purely temporal, political doctrine of racial superiority and hatred towards inferior races.

If Nazism produced peace loving, non-prejudiced strains it would be in spite of its doctrine, whereas peace and goodwill - and freedom for that matter - is literally adhering directly to the core tenants of Islam. A point that the vast majority of muslims understand, and frequently die because of it.

So Islam differs from Nazism in that Islam also claims to be a religion?

Did Muhammad ever instruct his followers not to be friends with the infidel?

Can you explain how freedom adheres directly to the core tenet of Islam? Would you say that Muhammad was violating a core tenet of Islam in his use of slavery?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Poll
Question: Is a 17 year old a "child"?
Yes 4 (50.0%) No 2 (25.0%) Anyone who thinks so should be investigated 2 (25.0%) Total votes: 8 « Last Modified by: rhino on: Apr 30^th, 2019 at 11:17pm »