freediver wrote on Jun 26
th, 2019 at 1:17pm:
Are you suggesting I ought to anticipate the specific manifastation of your slippery evasiveness?
I'm suggesting that when you ask a question about "movies", with no qualification, you ought to anticipate the specific manifestation of any type of movie - including, nay especially, the most popular forms of today - ie youtube.
freediver wrote on Jun 26
th, 2019 at 1:17pm:
Am I supposed to start a new thread for every question in an effort to avoid this idiocy?
no, you can just concede the point when you are proven wrong, and move on to another topic if you so wish. What you are not "supposed" to do is shift the parameters of your argument every time it is disproven - and pretend its what you really meant all along.
freediver wrote on Jun 26
th, 2019 at 1:17pm:
You didn't answer the question Gandalf. Which of those youtube clips do you think comes closest to passing for a movie?
I did answer, sorry if it was unclear - here it is again:
To your absurdly narrow definition? None. To everyone elses, probably thousands or more.(hint: I actually think the correct answer is "thousands" - the giveaway being 'everyone else [except you]' but included your absurd option for dramatic effect - to demonstrate how, you know, absurd it is)