DonDeeHippy wrote on May 23
rd, 2019 at 8:56am:
cods wrote on May 23
rd, 2019 at 8:37am:
DonDeeHippy wrote on May 23
rd, 2019 at 8:14am:
If you want to do a Comparison it should be between Advance Australia (right wingers) and Getup (left wingers).
To do a comparison to a national News group who are supposed to be Neutral to a political group is very disturbing as one of them should not have a bias at all..…..
GETUP CLAIMS NEUTRALITY
since when have the news media ever been neutral???
you must live on a different planet to me...
or you dont read the letter pages....
or fairfax for that matter
Only Neutral to a political party, not issue's. If a politician goes against one of their campaigns (eg increasing coal production instead of decreasing) then they go against that politician.
Don't forget that Getup are actively against Adani and that is in a Labor run state, so they are going against the Labor party there....
How do you explain that if you say they are run by a Party...
It's easy to explain if they are having a campaign that is against coal production.
That is what they are set up to do...….
National media agerncies however should be above political biases and just report the news, it doesn't matter if Murdock or Fairfax do it, they are both in the wrong.
Getup however are true to what they stand for ,just because you don't like what they stand up for doesn't matter.
Don't forget in February this year the electoral council looked into their affairs and said they are neutral if you disagree take it up with the AEC.
So many of those who support Adani are doing so because their side tells them to, not because they're informed on the subject.
But today, that's all that matters now. You're a branded a weak lefty if you're informed. Nobody, or should I say, very few people bother to read parliamentary reports or even follow up with checking sources or even fact-checking. I do that, but every time I share an informed post, it gets countered with a meme as if that means anything.
That's the world we now live in.
These same people get their opinions from the news sources they prefer, the ones that tell them what they like to hear.
Or worse, and ever increasing now, they get it from Facebook, Twitter and Reddit, who get it from bloggers, who post their opinions about the sources that they like, again that tell them what they want to hear. These opinions are considered to be as valuable as facts, or even that they are facts.
But so often, especially when scrutinising certain posters on here, when you follow the trail back to the original sources, the message they are looking to as facts are simply unsupported by the source material, nearly every single time.
The truth these days equals conformity, conformity to the beholder's opinions.
Actual objective fact is irrelevant, especially here.
A lot of what GetUp! tends to support is based on the facts of the situation. They're not a shining beacon of truth because when something doesn't fit their ideological stance they ignore it. It's better than lying about it like the Murdock rags but it's still not perfect.
Those who hate on GetUp! have no problem with the influences that support their side or their stances. They don't like GetUp! because for too long the lies told that bolster support for their ideology went unopposed.
You have to fight money with money, and that's what GetUp! is.
And unless those attacking GetUp! will advocate for real reform in that area, they just want their side funded and not the other.
To those people, go eat a dick. You're part of the problem, almost more so than the parties involved. It's their support and hypocrisy towards their side that had created the void that GetUp! tried to fill.
All they want is a safe space so the lies they like to hear, that supports the world view their insecurities need to sleep at night can be spread unopposed as if they're true.