mothra wrote on Jun 17
th, 2019 at 12:53pm:
What procedure, Gordy?
Who are you speaking for?
gandalf has acknowledge two
procedures..one we all know about.. [horrific]..but the second???????
Quote:As I suspected - they are lumping in the least intrusive procedure, whats known as "symbolic nicking", in which little or no actual flesh is removed, with full-blown butchering off the entire clitoris and/or inner labia.
The latter is completely barbaric, while the first is basically harmless.
sorry to pick on the words you use gandy but we all get picked on for words now and then..
I think any normal thinking person agrees with you regarding female mutilation...
however I am scratching my head on your remarks regarding the first
symbolic nicking.. procedure..
what the hell is symbolic about feeling inside a females genitalia???......and just taking a NICK.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e80c/3e80c8b11c578affbc3dabf3662ff12afb8094ca" alt="Angry Angry"
would you mind if someone was commissioned to put a symbolic instrument up your penis and take a symbolic NICK?..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39cad/39cade3d2eb3870ad7225052dc8f3e40f6d33996" alt="Roll Eyes Roll Eyes"
this is more than child abuse....its filthy and barbaric,...
someone is traumatised for life
for what bloody benefit no one will ever know...
and you call it
BASICALLY HARMLESS... anyone doing anything with anyones private parts without their permission is a child abuser....
there are no excuses absolutely NONE..
its shocked me to be honest that gandy actually goes along with a medievil procedure...of no value whatever...
it is all FGM.. get your hands off these babies.
Calling it symbolic nicking is really just trying to sugar coat FGM.
A "ritual nick" too far
In October 1992 a program went to air on ABC TV called Where Angels Fear to Tread on female genital mutilation. I was involved through a program the ABC offered to aspiring writers called Writer-in-Observation.
The storyline was of a young schoolgirl of Muslim background who was brought to the surgery by her mother to have a procedure performed that involved female genital mutilation. This placed the doctors in a dilemma. It was a procedure that although not banned at the time was strongly advised against by the Australian Medical Association, leaving individual doctors to make their own ethical decisions.The arguments made were that if Australian doctors did not perform this procedure, it would, much like the abortion debate, lead to back-alley bungling or the girl being taken overseas to have the procedure.In 1994, two years after the screening of this episode, the AMA banned all forms of female genital mutilation Australia-wide. But, now here in Australia, it has been suggested that a "ritual nick" could be performed to appease cultural sensibilities in some Muslim communities. http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-national/doctors-dont-support-ritual-nicking-20100528-wi3t.html
Doctors in London 30 years ago were forced to perform hysterectomies to save the lives of Middle Eastern women who had given birth after enduring female genital mutilation.In Muslim countries where these customs are still being observed, there are woman taking great risks, sometimes life threatening, to protect their young girls from these practices. They themselves want it to cease once and for all. If we in Australia legitimise these practices, however ritualistically, it will totally negate their work, their beliefs and their futures. Now is not the time to succumb to this tradition.
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/a-ritual-nick-too-far-20100625-z8x2.html