Frank wrote on Jun 25
th, 2019 at 6:39pm:
John Smith wrote on Jun 25
th, 2019 at 6:35pm:
Frank wrote on Jun 25
th, 2019 at 6:34pm:
Isn't this really about Falau versus Pooftahs who believe in Hell?
no, it's about Falau breaching his employment contract
Is a contract demanding that you do not profess your own views in your own private capacity, in your own private life lawful? Instinctively NO - and we will see it legally clarified at the end of the law case for which he is receiving financial support.
Raven would argue that a business or organisation has a right to expect it's employees do not bring the business into disrepute. Almost every company has policies it expects it's employees to abide by. A lot of them around social media.
Had Falau expressed his views in a more private fashion we would not have this conversation. This is not the first time he has made comments that concerned Rugby Australia. They asked him not to do it again and when he did they took action.
This is not about freedom of speech or freedom of religion.
He was perfectly free to say whatever he liked — but not be free from consequences.
The fact of the matter is Folau signed a contract with his employer, for which he was paid handsomely, and made a series of commitments to not bring the sport into disrepute, not to distract from his on-field activities, and not to target specific groups in a hateful or offensive way.
He breached the terms of that contract and Rugby Australia responded.