John Smith wrote on Jun 30
th, 2019 at 11:12pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 30
th, 2019 at 8:59pm:
I'm sure they'll summon up the courage to speak for themselves then.
you bought them up, not me.
freediver wrote on Jun 30
th, 2019 at 8:59pm:
Not by them.
doesn't make you any less wrong
freediver wrote on Jun 30
th, 2019 at 8:59pm:
No they weren't.
yes they were. Aussie answered your questions earlier. I know what you can do, keep asking. Maybe that'll work for you the next time around.
freediver wrote on Jun 30
th, 2019 at 8:59pm:
I'm sure they'll summon up the courage to speak for themselves then.
if they can be bothered.
You asked, I answered.
Have any of them asked you to speak on their behalf?
Aussie is not one of them.
John Smith wrote on Jun 30
th, 2019 at 8:35pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 30
th, 2019 at 8:25pm:
John Smith wrote on Jun 30
th, 2019 at 8:22pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 30
th, 2019 at 7:32pm:
That's all. Just wanted to establish that he was fired for his religious views.
which would be great if he wasn't in fact sacked for breaching his contract
By expressing his religious views.
Having a bit of paper to justify what you do does not mean you aren't actually doing it.
no, by 'harassing or bullying' someone because of their sexual preference. His religious views are not an escape clause in my view.
Who did Folau harass and bully? Does their butthurt mean Folau was not expressing his religious views when he expressed his religious views? Why does this double speak seem to come with the territory of homofascist apologetics?
freediver wrote on Jun 28
th, 2019 at 5:32pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 28
th, 2019 at 2:16am:
Raven wrote on Jun 27
th, 2019 at 10:11pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 27
th, 2019 at 9:28pm:
Raven wrote on Jun 27
th, 2019 at 9:25pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 27
th, 2019 at 9:06pm:
Quote:Should Folau's right to freedom of religion trump others right to freedom from religion?
Of course. What imbecile would suggest otherwise?
So you think a person who is religious should have more rights then a person who is not?
No. I assumed when you said freedom from religion you meant something idiotic like freedom from other people's opinions.
Well we all know what assumption is the mother of.
Falou has the right to his religious beliefs. By the same token other people have the right to not be subjected to those beliefs.
You seem to be agreeing and disagreeing at the same time. So which is it? Did you mean something idiotic like freedom from the terrible burden of other people expressing a different opinion to you?
Bump for Raven.
Raven?
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 1
st, 2019 at 4:14pm:
Raven wrote on Jul 1
st, 2019 at 4:07pm:
He was not fired because of his religious beliefs, he was fired because he continually breached the code of conduct he promised to abide by.
Exactly.
And now he's going to waste everyone's time & money in the Federal Court just to be told that.
What a boofhead.
Inventing a code of conduct that forbids expressing his religious beliefs does not mean he was not fired for expressing his religious beliefs, just that you are a spineless apologist for the homofascists.