Australian Politics Forum - freedom from religion

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38864
Gender: male

Re: freedom from religion
Reply #30 - Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:09pm

Quote:

Losing your job is not the same as being banned from an internet forum. One is demonstrable harm, the other is being a whiny little bitch.

That's merely a question of arguable degree (which I am happy to debate with you,) and fails to address the actual point. If you agree to a set of Rules and breach them, there are consequences.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49476
At my desk.

Re: freedom from religion
Reply #31 - Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:34pm

Aussie wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:09pm:

Quote:

Losing your job is not the same as being banned from an internet forum. One is demonstrable harm, the other is being a whiny little bitch.

That's merely a question of arguable degree (which I am happy to debate with you,) and fails to address the actual point. If you agree to a set of Rules and breach them, there are consequences.

Yes, supporters of homofascism keep flip flopping between redefining freedom of speech to mean freedom from free speech, and turning Folau's sacking into a technicality.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38864
Gender: male

Re: freedom from religion
Reply #32 - Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:42pm

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:34pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:09pm:

Quote:

Losing your job is not the same as being banned from an internet forum. One is demonstrable harm, the other is being a whiny little bitch.

That's merely a question of arguable degree (which I am happy to debate with you,) and fails to address the actual point. If you agree to a set of Rules and breach them, there are consequences.

Yes, supporters of homofascism keep flip flopping between redefining freedom of speech to mean freedom from free speech, and

turning Folau's sacking into a technicality.

Of course, it is a technicality but no more or less than any other breach of contract is a technicality which gives rise to rights and consequences. Why are you bending the Rules on this occasion? Roolz is Roolz yes?

Back to top

IP Logged

Grappler Deep State Feller Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 85432 Always was always will be HOME Gender:	Re: freedom from religion Reply #33 - Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:43pm John Smith wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 11:43am: freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 11:39am: It's irrelevant. rubbish. You're sacked for publishing that comment in public ....
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49476
At my desk.

Re: freedom from religion
Reply #34 - Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:46pm

Aussie wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:42pm:

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:34pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:09pm:

Quote:

Losing your job is not the same as being banned from an internet forum. One is demonstrable harm, the other is being a whiny little bitch.

That's merely a question of arguable degree (which I am happy to debate with you,) and fails to address the actual point. If you agree to a set of Rules and breach them, there are consequences.

Yes, supporters of homofascism keep flip flopping between redefining freedom of speech to mean freedom from free speech, and

turning Folau's sacking into a technicality.

Of course, it is a technicality but no more or less than any other breach of contract is a technicality which gives rise to rights and consequences. Why are you bending the Rules on this occasion? Roolz is Roolz yes?

It is also an attack on freedom of speech.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38864
Gender: male

Re: freedom from religion
Reply #35 - Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:55pm

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:46pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:42pm:

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:34pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:09pm:

Quote:

Losing your job is not the same as being banned from an internet forum. One is demonstrable harm, the other is being a whiny little bitch.

That's merely a question of arguable degree (which I am happy to debate with you,) and fails to address the actual point. If you agree to a set of Rules and breach them, there are consequences.

Yes, supporters of homofascism keep flip flopping between redefining freedom of speech to mean freedom from free speech, and

turning Folau's sacking into a technicality.

Of course, it is a technicality but no more or less than any other breach of contract is a technicality which gives rise to rights and consequences. Why are you bending the Rules on this occasion? Roolz is Roolz yes?

It is also an attack on freedom of speech.

What is?

Maybe the reality is this. Someone signs a Contract...then breaches its terms and he does not like the outcome of his own breach. So he becomes a 'whiny little bitch.'

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 75246 Gender:	Re: freedom from religion Reply #36 - Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:56pm Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:43pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 11:43am: freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 11:39am: It's irrelevant. rubbish. You're sacked for publishing that comment in public .... good luck with that
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75246
Gender: male

Re: freedom from religion
Reply #37 - Jun 30^th, 2019 at 3:01pm

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 12:00pm:

Losing your job is not the same as being banned from an internet forum. One is demonstrable harm, the other is being a whiny little bitch.

Maybe if you pay me $4m per annum to post here, that'll help clarify things for you? Cheesy

Both are breaching the rules they agreed to. The bigger the reward, the bigger the consequences.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49476
At my desk.

Re: freedom from religion
Reply #38 - Jun 30^th, 2019 at 3:01pm

Aussie wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:55pm:

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:46pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:42pm:

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:34pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:09pm:

Quote:

Losing your job is not the same as being banned from an internet forum. One is demonstrable harm, the other is being a whiny little bitch.

That's merely a question of arguable degree (which I am happy to debate with you,) and fails to address the actual point. If you agree to a set of Rules and breach them, there are consequences.

Yes, supporters of homofascism keep flip flopping between redefining freedom of speech to mean freedom from free speech, and

turning Folau's sacking into a technicality.

Of course, it is a technicality but no more or less than any other breach of contract is a technicality which gives rise to rights and consequences. Why are you bending the Rules on this occasion? Roolz is Roolz yes?

It is also an attack on freedom of speech.

What is?

Maybe the reality is this. Someone signs a Contract...then breaches its terms and he does not like the outcome of his own breach. So he becomes a 'whiny little bitch.'

Most employment contracts these days contain vague clauses like the one used to fire Folau.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75246
Gender: male

Re: freedom from religion
Reply #39 - Jun 30^th, 2019 at 3:02pm

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:46pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:42pm:

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:34pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:09pm:

Quote:

Losing your job is not the same as being banned from an internet forum. One is demonstrable harm, the other is being a whiny little bitch.

That's merely a question of arguable degree (which I am happy to debate with you,) and fails to address the actual point. If you agree to a set of Rules and breach them, there are consequences.

Yes, supporters of homofascism keep flip flopping between redefining freedom of speech to mean freedom from free speech, and

turning Folau's sacking into a technicality.

Of course, it is a technicality but no more or less than any other breach of contract is a technicality which gives rise to rights and consequences. Why are you bending the Rules on this occasion? Roolz is Roolz yes?

It is also an attack on freedom of speech.

as are your dumb rules. I don't see you starting countless threads on that.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49476
At my desk.

Re: freedom from religion
Reply #40 - Jun 30^th, 2019 at 3:02pm

John Smith wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 3:01pm:

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 12:00pm:

Losing your job is not the same as being banned from an internet forum. One is demonstrable harm, the other is being a whiny little bitch.

Maybe if you pay me $4m per annum to post here, that'll help clarify things for you? Cheesy

Both are breaching the rules they agreed to. The bigger the reward, the bigger the consequences.

One consequence is an attack on freedom of speech. One isn't. You do not have a fundamental human right to post on this website.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75246
Gender: male

Re: freedom from religion
Reply #41 - Jun 30^th, 2019 at 3:02pm

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 3:01pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:55pm:

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:46pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:42pm:

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:34pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:09pm:

Quote:

Losing your job is not the same as being banned from an internet forum. One is demonstrable harm, the other is being a whiny little bitch.

That's merely a question of arguable degree (which I am happy to debate with you,) and fails to address the actual point. If you agree to a set of Rules and breach them, there are consequences.

Yes, supporters of homofascism keep flip flopping between redefining freedom of speech to mean freedom from free speech, and

turning Folau's sacking into a technicality.

Of course, it is a technicality but no more or less than any other breach of contract is a technicality which gives rise to rights and consequences. Why are you bending the Rules on this occasion? Roolz is Roolz yes?

It is also an attack on freedom of speech.

What is?

Maybe the reality is this. Someone signs a Contract...then breaches its terms and he does not like the outcome of his own breach. So he becomes a 'whiny little bitch.'

Most employment contracts these days contain vague clauses like the one used to fire Folau.

Don't like it, don't sign it.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75246
Gender: male

Re: freedom from religion
Reply #42 - Jun 30^th, 2019 at 3:03pm

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 3:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 3:01pm:

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 12:00pm:

Losing your job is not the same as being banned from an internet forum. One is demonstrable harm, the other is being a whiny little bitch.

Maybe if you pay me $4m per annum to post here, that'll help clarify things for you? Cheesy

Both are breaching the rules they agreed to. The bigger the reward, the bigger the consequences.

One consequence is an attack on freedom of speech. One isn't. You do not have a fundamental human right to post on this website.

and Folau does not have a fundamental human right to play for Rugby Australia.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Fuzzball

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 6381
Australia
Gender: male

Re: freedom from religion
Reply #43 - Jun 30^th, 2019 at 3:04pm

Aussie wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:55pm:

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:46pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:42pm:

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:34pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 2:09pm:

Quote:

Losing your job is not the same as being banned from an internet forum. One is demonstrable harm, the other is being a whiny little bitch.

That's merely a question of arguable degree (which I am happy to debate with you,) and fails to address the actual point. If you agree to a set of Rules and breach them, there are consequences.

Yes, supporters of homofascism keep flip flopping between redefining freedom of speech to mean freedom from free speech, and

turning Folau's sacking into a technicality.

Of course, it is a technicality but no more or less than any other breach of contract is a technicality which gives rise to rights and consequences. Why are you bending the Rules on this occasion? Roolz is Roolz yes?

It is also an attack on freedom of speech.

What is?

Maybe the reality is this. Someone signs a Contract...then breaches its terms and he does not like the outcome of his own breach. So he becomes a 'whiny little bitch.'

They cannot IMPOSE restrictions on religion..........othwise there would be no muslims in Australia........and the only 'whiny little bitch' is you arsie.......

Back to top

Life's Journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting,
"Holy Sh!t ... What a Ride!"

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38864
Gender: male

Re: freedom from religion
Reply #44 - Jun 30^th, 2019 at 3:04pm

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 3:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 3:01pm:

freediver wrote on Jun 30^th, 2019 at 12:00pm:

Losing your job is not the same as being banned from an internet forum. One is demonstrable harm, the other is being a whiny little bitch.

Maybe if you pay me $4m per annum to post here, that'll help clarify things for you? Cheesy

Both are breaching the rules they agreed to. The bigger the reward, the bigger the consequences.

One consequence is an attack on freedom of speech. One isn't. You do not have a fundamental human right to post on this website.

Explain that. Dumb it down for me, Effendi.

Back to top

IP Logged