Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
Your Favourite Conspiracy Theory (Read 5956 times)
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Your Favourite Conspiracy Theory
Reply #60 - Sep 2nd, 2019 at 3:31pm
 
A google search instead found this


International Committee of the Red Cross
Holocaust deniers misrepresent and omit information contained in ICRC reports that contradict their claims.[80] Critics argue that Richard Harwood in his "Did Six Million Really Die?" pamphlet could only claim that the ICRC had found no evidence of a policy to exterminate Jews by ignoring key sections of the 1948 report, where the ICRC explicitly states that the systematic extermination of Jews was Nazi policy.[81]

Harwood disputed the notion that homicidal gas chambers were disguised as shower facilities by citing references in the report where ICRC officials inspected bathing facilities. He used their responses to argue that showers functioned as showers and were not part of a killing installation. However this is considered misrepresentation by critics, as the passage Harwood cited is in reference to Allied camps for civilians in Egypt and thus had nothing to do with Nazi concentration camps.[82]


A letter from the Sonderstandesamt (special registry office) at Bad Arolsen regarding only deaths at Nazi concentration camps that were registered by this institution (not to be confused with the numbers of deaths officially registered in the camps themselves). This and similar correspondence is frequently misrepresented as the absolute death toll of the Holocaust by deniers. Note that the English translations are not a part of the original document and are incorrect: the document does not come from the Red Cross. "Anzahl" means "count", "number" and not "Total Deaths".
Harwood also claimed that Die Tat, a Swiss tabloid newspaper, published statistics that concluded the number of people who died in Nazi prisons and camps from 1939 to 1945 based on ICRC statistics was "300,000, not all of whom were Jews".[83] The January 19, 1955 edition of Die Tat did indeed give a 300,000 figure, but this was only in reference to "Germans and German Jews" and not nationals of other countries.[84] In the 1978 official bulletin, entitled "False Propaganda", the ICRC denounced Holocaust denial and confirmed that the agency "Never published—or even compiled—statistics of this kind which are being falsely attributed to it" and stated that its mission was "to help war victims, not to count them",[85][86][87] and questioned how they would have even been able to obtain such statistics had they wanted to, given that they were "only able to enter only a few concentration camps...in the final days of the war".[85][87] The agency states that the figures used are "the number of deaths recorded by the International Tracing Service on the basis of documents found when the camps were closed",[85][87] and accordingly bear no relation to the total death tolls, since the Nazis destroyed much documentation, and that many deaths occurred in camps where prisoners were generally not registered.[85][87] The ICRC considers this misrepresentation as "propaganda",[85][87] and because these claims regarding the ICRC were used for the defense of Ernst Zündel at his trial in 1985, critics state that despite the agency's attempts to demonstrate the truth, Holocaust deniers have continued to rely on ICRC based disinformation.[84] Archives of the International Tracing Service (located in Bad Arolsen) responding to such misrepresentation can be found here.[88] In 1979, the ICRC stated a second time that they have "never tried to compile statistics on the victims of the war",[89] nor "certified the accuracy of the statistics produced by a third party",[89] and state that the authors of such material have "falsified" both claims that the document originates from the ICRC and refers exclusively to Jews.[89]

As well as in personal correspondence, the ICRC has also addressed this misrepresentation by several other means. In 1975, the ICRC wrote to the Board of Deputies of British Jews in London regarding Harwood's citations, stating:

The figures cited by the author of the booklet are based upon statistics falsely attributed to us, evidently for the purpose of giving them credibility, despite the fact that we never publish information of this kind.[90]

— Françoise Perret, Comité International de la Croix-Rouge, to Jacob Gewirtz, August 22, 1975.



SO I guess that ends, unless you want to continue this charade
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Your Favourite Conspiracy Theory
Reply #61 - Sep 2nd, 2019 at 4:18pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Sep 1st, 2019 at 8:55pm:
My favorite conspiracy involves tens of thousands of scientists not ONE of whom has broken the silence.

Yes, silly conspiracy theory believed in by sad little brainless deniers, like Booby here, who believe it is all a conspiracy. How whacked out can you get?



Not only that, but apparently they are willing to put their reputation and careers on the line by deliberately falsifying data. This includes the Bureau of Meteorology, the Met Office and NASA.

Luckily a bunch of plucky keyboard warriors with Google and youtube are able to put the scientists in their place.  Grin
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 47373
Gender: male
Re: Your Favourite Conspiracy Theory
Reply #62 - Sep 2nd, 2019 at 7:55pm
 
Jewish Holocaust?


Well Jesus did say his little Bro' Hitler would get revenge, to them long ago.  Grin Cheesy
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: Your Favourite Conspiracy Theory
Reply #63 - Sep 2nd, 2019 at 8:50pm
 
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 3:31pm:
A google search instead found this


International Committee of the Red Cross
Holocaust deniers misrepresent and omit information contained in ICRC reports that contradict their claims.[80] Critics argue that Richard Harwood in his "Did Six Million Really Die?" pamphlet could only claim that the ICRC had found no evidence of a policy to exterminate Jews by ignoring key sections of the 1948 report, where the ICRC explicitly states that the systematic extermination of Jews was Nazi policy.[81]

Harwood disputed the notion that homicidal gas chambers were disguised as shower facilities by citing references in the report where ICRC officials inspected bathing facilities. He used their responses to argue that showers functioned as showers and were not part of a killing installation. However this is considered misrepresentation by critics, as the passage Harwood cited is in reference to Allied camps for civilians in Egypt and thus had nothing to do with Nazi concentration camps.[82]


A letter from the Sonderstandesamt (special registry office) at Bad Arolsen regarding only deaths at Nazi concentration camps that were registered by this institution (not to be confused with the numbers of deaths officially registered in the camps themselves). This and similar correspondence is frequently misrepresented as the absolute death toll of the Holocaust by deniers. Note that the English translations are not a part of the original document and are incorrect: the document does not come from the Red Cross. "Anzahl" means "count", "number" and not "Total Deaths".
Harwood also claimed that Die Tat, a Swiss tabloid newspaper, published statistics that concluded the number of people who died in Nazi prisons and camps from 1939 to 1945 based on ICRC statistics was "300,000, not all of whom were Jews".[83] The January 19, 1955 edition of Die Tat did indeed give a 300,000 figure, but this was only in reference to "Germans and German Jews" and not nationals of other countries.[84] In the 1978 official bulletin, entitled "False Propaganda", the ICRC denounced Holocaust denial and confirmed that the agency "Never published—or even compiled—statistics of this kind which are being falsely attributed to it" and stated that its mission was "to help war victims, not to count them",[85][86][87] and questioned how they would have even been able to obtain such statistics had they wanted to, given that they were "only able to enter only a few concentration camps...in the final days of the war".[85][87] The agency states that the figures used are "the number of deaths recorded by the International Tracing Service on the basis of documents found when the camps were closed",[85][87] and accordingly bear no relation to the total death tolls, since the Nazis destroyed much documentation, and that many deaths occurred in camps where prisoners were generally not registered.[85][87] The ICRC considers this misrepresentation as "propaganda",[85][87] and because these claims regarding the ICRC were used for the defense of Ernst Zündel at his trial in 1985, critics state that despite the agency's attempts to demonstrate the truth, Holocaust deniers have continued to rely on ICRC based disinformation.[84] Archives of the International Tracing Service (located in Bad Arolsen) responding to such misrepresentation can be found here.[88] In 1979, the ICRC stated a second time that they have "never tried to compile statistics on the victims of the war",[89] nor "certified the accuracy of the statistics produced by a third party",[89] and state that the authors of such material have "falsified" both claims that the document originates from the ICRC and refers exclusively to Jews.[89]

As well as in personal correspondence, the ICRC has also addressed this misrepresentation by several other means. In 1975, the ICRC wrote to the Board of Deputies of British Jews in London regarding Harwood's citations, stating:

The figures cited by the author of the booklet are based upon statistics falsely attributed to us, evidently for the purpose of giving them credibility, despite the fact that we never publish information of this kind.[90]

— Françoise Perret, Comité International de la Croix-Rouge, to Jacob Gewirtz, August 22, 1975.



SO I guess that ends, unless you want to continue this charade


I've read the offic8al stuff, too.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Your Favourite Conspiracy Theory
Reply #64 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 7:35am
 
Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 8:50pm:
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 3:31pm:
A google search instead found this


International Committee of the Red Cross
Holocaust deniers misrepresent and omit information contained in ICRC reports that contradict their claims.[80] Critics argue that Richard Harwood in his "Did Six Million Really Die?" pamphlet could only claim that the ICRC had found no evidence of a policy to exterminate Jews by ignoring key sections of the 1948 report, where the ICRC explicitly states that the systematic extermination of Jews was Nazi policy.[81]

Harwood disputed the notion that homicidal gas chambers were disguised as shower facilities by citing references in the report where ICRC officials inspected bathing facilities. He used their responses to argue that showers functioned as showers and were not part of a killing installation. However this is considered misrepresentation by critics, as the passage Harwood cited is in reference to Allied camps for civilians in Egypt and thus had nothing to do with Nazi concentration camps.[82]


A letter from the Sonderstandesamt (special registry office) at Bad Arolsen regarding only deaths at Nazi concentration camps that were registered by this institution (not to be confused with the numbers of deaths officially registered in the camps themselves). This and similar correspondence is frequently misrepresented as the absolute death toll of the Holocaust by deniers. Note that the English translations are not a part of the original document and are incorrect: the document does not come from the Red Cross. "Anzahl" means "count", "number" and not "Total Deaths".
Harwood also claimed that Die Tat, a Swiss tabloid newspaper, published statistics that concluded the number of people who died in Nazi prisons and camps from 1939 to 1945 based on ICRC statistics was "300,000, not all of whom were Jews".[83] The January 19, 1955 edition of Die Tat did indeed give a 300,000 figure, but this was only in reference to "Germans and German Jews" and not nationals of other countries.[84] In the 1978 official bulletin, entitled "False Propaganda", the ICRC denounced Holocaust denial and confirmed that the agency "Never published—or even compiled—statistics of this kind which are being falsely attributed to it" and stated that its mission was "to help war victims, not to count them",[85][86][87] and questioned how they would have even been able to obtain such statistics had they wanted to, given that they were "only able to enter only a few concentration camps...in the final days of the war".[85][87] The agency states that the figures used are "the number of deaths recorded by the International Tracing Service on the basis of documents found when the camps were closed",[85][87] and accordingly bear no relation to the total death tolls, since the Nazis destroyed much documentation, and that many deaths occurred in camps where prisoners were generally not registered.[85][87] The ICRC considers this misrepresentation as "propaganda",[85][87] and because these claims regarding the ICRC were used for the defense of Ernst Zündel at his trial in 1985, critics state that despite the agency's attempts to demonstrate the truth, Holocaust deniers have continued to rely on ICRC based disinformation.[84] Archives of the International Tracing Service (located in Bad Arolsen) responding to such misrepresentation can be found here.[88] In 1979, the ICRC stated a second time that they have "never tried to compile statistics on the victims of the war",[89] nor "certified the accuracy of the statistics produced by a third party",[89] and state that the authors of such material have "falsified" both claims that the document originates from the ICRC and refers exclusively to Jews.[89]

As well as in personal correspondence, the ICRC has also addressed this misrepresentation by several other means. In 1975, the ICRC wrote to the Board of Deputies of British Jews in London regarding Harwood's citations, stating:

The figures cited by the author of the booklet are based upon statistics falsely attributed to us, evidently for the purpose of giving them credibility, despite the fact that we never publish information of this kind.[90]

— Françoise Perret, Comité International de la Croix-Rouge, to Jacob Gewirtz, August 22, 1975.



SO I guess that ends, unless you want to continue this charade


I've read the offic8al stuff, too.



So I take that as yes.
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: Your Favourite Conspiracy Theory
Reply #65 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 8:28am
 
Don't argue with fools; people won't know the difference.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Your Favourite Conspiracy Theory
Reply #66 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 9:01am
 
Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 8:28am:
Don't argue with fools; people won't know the difference.




I always ignore that rule with people on here.
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 47373
Gender: male
Re: Your Favourite Conspiracy Theory
Reply #67 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 7:21pm
 
*Blow dart's Bojack Horseman in the neck with a nice dose of Vampyro Teuthis Infernalis mucus.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Your Favourite Conspiracy Theory
Reply #68 - Sep 4th, 2019 at 7:31am
 
Jasin wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 7:21pm:
*Blow dart's Bojack Horseman in the neck with a nice dose of Vampyro Teuthis Infernalis mucus.




Cool, bioluminescence
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
Marla
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Weed is my Jesus

Posts: 13494
Colorado
Gender: female
Re: Your Favourite Conspiracy Theory
Reply #69 - Sep 4th, 2019 at 7:35am
 
There is no one better than Captain Mark Richards of the "Secret Space Command"

For over 30 years, Captain Mark Richards has been and still is, a prisoner of the war between on and off planet races that have dominated Earth for centuries.  He is an honorable officer of the Navy, who because of his rebellion against the Draco and Reptoids (Luciferian alliance) is considered a threat to their operations.

He was framed for a murder he is accused of having masterminded while he was on a mission off-planet in service to humanity.  He was Captain of a starship enterprise type vessel, fighting the war against aliens bent on the takeover of Planet Earth.

I am the only journalist who has interviewed him in person while he is in prison.–Kerry Lynn Cassidy, Project Camelot"


http://projectcamelotportal.com/2019/03/01/mark-richards-captain-secret-space-pr...
Back to top
 

I know progress has no patience but something's got to give
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 102994
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Your Favourite Conspiracy Theory
Reply #70 - Sep 9th, 2019 at 11:47am
 
Charles Manson did 9/11 using demonic, telepathic powers.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 47373
Gender: male
Re: Your Favourite Conspiracy Theory
Reply #71 - Sep 9th, 2019 at 7:39pm
 
When White Men thought they were superior in their little Europe (because they believed the Middle-Eastern Religious lies) when they discovered the entire rest of the planet was covered in Darkies.

Only when the White Man realises that he is the 'inferior' - that he will receive 'half the world'.

It pays not to be a Jealous God.
  Wink
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Super Nova
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3065
Everywhere
Gender: male
Re: Your Favourite Conspiracy Theory
Reply #72 - Sep 25th, 2019 at 4:21pm
 
Jasin wrote on Sep 9th, 2019 at 7:39pm:
When White Men thought they were superior in their little Europe (because they believed the Middle-Eastern Religious lies) when they discovered the entire rest of the planet was covered in Darkies.

Only when the White Man realises that he is the 'inferior' - that he will receive 'half the world'.

It pays not to be a Jealous God.
  Wink


Love it.

Then they realized they were descendants of darkies out of Africa and all is lost.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 47373
Gender: male
Re: Your Favourite Conspiracy Theory
Reply #73 - Sep 25th, 2019 at 11:18pm
 
Super Nova wrote on Sep 25th, 2019 at 4:21pm:
Jasin wrote on Sep 9th, 2019 at 7:39pm:
When White Men thought they were superior in their little Europe (because they believed the Middle-Eastern Religious lies) when they discovered the entire rest of the planet was covered in Darkies.

Only when the White Man realises that he is the 'inferior' - that he will receive 'half the world'.

It pays not to be a Jealous God.
  Wink


Love it.

Then they realized they were descendants of darkies out of Africa and all is lost.


Genetically we are like children to the ancient San Bushmen. You could say they have 42 differentials of DNA, where us Negroids, Caucasoids, Mongoloids and even Australoids of 150,000 years ago have just 16 to 25 different DNA strains of connection. Besides the fact that all Vaccines should be based on the San Bushman's genetic make-up and not on some 'base' of just 18 in variation.

And yet many 'nationalised' races of today exhibit mass breeding without any internal penetration from other races. These are the 'Male' Races where their genetic evolutionaring is moving backwards - towards the 'One' true Gene only.  Roll Eyes

The World is a funny place sometimes.  Sad
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print