While searching for the latest info about the Skaf brothers to find out how long they have to go before their non-parole terms expire, I discovered this article about the youngest brother, Hadi Skaf, who was only an infant at the time of his elder brothers' many rape offences. Hadi Skaf is into cocaine while driving and caught speeding

Then further into the article it says: "In 2002, Mrs Skaf was banned from visiting her son (Bilal) in prison after she was caught trying to smuggle two letters written by Bilal to his then girlfriend, with two prison maps he had drawn."

"Security cameras in Goulburn’s Supermax caught Mrs Skaf concealing letters in her sock."

Younger brother of gang rapists on cocaine charge

As the family of the Skaf gang rape brothers prepares for one member to return after 20 years in prison, a younger brother has been charged with a drug offence.

https://www.news.com.au/national/courts-law/younger-brother-of-gang-rapists-on-c...


Back to the non-parole terms of Bilal Skaf and Mohammed Skaf.

Bilal Skaf's term is 2033 and Mohammed Skaf's term is 2024(after four attempts of trying for early release, but I still can't determine if his fourth attempt was successful or not. Does anyone know? There's nothing on the internet that I could find, and the Parole hearing was a closed session ... Also, his parents were building a granny flat for him at home)

What's interesting about Mohammed Skaf's first three attempts for early release, and what we should be concerned about, is that he was knocked back each time because he gave the same reasons why he should not be in jail:

"

I am not to blame, the girls are to blame

" .. and yet he is clearly seen in photos tugging on a girls arm on Bondi Beach.

"A pre-release report compiled by Corrective Services in 2018 said Skaf 'has demonstrated no change in his attitude toward his offences since the beginning of his sentence' and 'continues to blame the victims'."

One young woman was raped 40 times by the Skaf brothers and friends ... the blame could hardly be that of the traumatized female victims

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8887427/Skaf-gang-rape-Youngest-Skaf-br...


When we ponder about this muslim family, we really should consider if they could ever straighten themselves out. The Skaf brothers and their friends can't seem to repent and they might always consider Aussies as "Aussie pigs"

"Along with other young Middle Eastern Australians, the Skaf brothers raped and degraded women they called “Aussie pigs”

They are surely not part of the success story of Malcolm Turnbull's "We have the most successful multiculturalism" ... muslims have a different philosophy on life about that, especially this notorious Skaf family

Why do you assume that what the Skaf's did is typical of what all Muslims do?  Surely even you can see that they were abhorrent in their behavior?  Why do you not condemn them and them alone for what they did?   

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 24^th, 2021 at 1:15pm:



Specifically, because Mohammed did     it,     rape of non-moslem women and [little] girls is lawful to every moslem man.

100% true !!

ISLAMIC law

"it" = = The Hadith records that Mohammed took Christian and Jewish, and Pagan women captive, in raids specifically to achieve that end.

And then Mohammed and "his companions"    used    the women how they wanted.

Some of the women were kept as sex slaves, to their captors.

Other women were redeemed by their menfolk, for a ransom price.



WWW search....

So, no non-Muslim has every committed the crime of rape, Yadda?  None at all?   

Quote:


The real reasons muzzos rape Christian women are.

They actually look like women, no hair on their faces or chest and you don't need a lawnmower to get at their ,..........

They don't smell like the other muzzo sex object...goats.

They have no idea of how to pleasure a woman, so they rape them.
It's terrifying for the woman, sometimes they don't even know they have been raped because it was less than 10 seconds.

A muzzos only method of foreplay is to punch the woman in the face, that's why they wear the Burma's, to hide the bruises and split lips.

And finally
Muzzos secretly wish they were Christians, because they are terrified they will be the next to be beheaded.

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 24^th, 2021 at 5:38pm:



No, of course not silly [i.e. yes! non-moslem men rape women - and in doing so, they are BREAKING THE LAW OF THE LAND].






Yadda wrote on Jan 24^th, 2021 at 1:55pm:



i.e.

because ISLAMIC law, makes it     LAWFUL     for a moslem man to commit the act of rape, whenever the victim of the rape is a non-moslem woman or girl.

But you already know that, don't you !    Tsk, tsk.


And, ISLAMIC law, also makes it      LAWFUL     for a moslem to murder, steal, and commit robbery against a person, if that person is a non-moslem.

But you already know that, don't you !    ....because you have a Doctorate of Divinity, and you would have learned these facts about ISLAMIC law, in your divinity studies into the religion of ISLAM.    Tsk, tsk.

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 24^th, 2021 at 11:04pm:


It doesn't allow rape, but apparently rape is ok in marriage

Muslim women are covered from head to toe, whereas Aussie women are less covered, even less so when sun bathing at the beach

Therein lies the problem, Aussie women are less covered and are non-muslim, fair game for some muslim men, if they could be called men

Sheik Hilali said: "Aussie women without headscarf are uncovered cat meat",

and this ....

Sheik Hilali alluded in his sermon to the gang rapes in Sydney, suggesting

the attackers were not entirely to blame.

Muslims have a problem laying blame where it rightfully belongs, with the perpetrators, and they insist that the female victims are also to blame somehow. For not wearing head scarfs?

The Skaf brothers and friends apparently committed many more rapes than they were charged with, the true extent of their rape spree may never be known, and they don't blame themselves for any of the rapes

Sheik Hilali announced to his muslim flock: "Fellow muslims, if you break Australia's (Western) law, you will just have to submit yourselves to Australia's (Western) punishment

Sheik Hilali is a thinker, sometimes he gets it right

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 24^th, 2021 at 1:15pm:



brian,

QUESTION;
Why are you so certain, that we can      safely assume      that any typical moslem [ !! a follower of ISLAM !! ] is a morally sound person ?

-------- >

-------- >

.


IMAGE.....





.


Quote:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/01/pakistan-cops-wont-investigate-muslim-45-who-...





.


brian,

      .....damning evidence [against ISLAM and moslems],    ALL I CAN ASSUME,    is that your own 'moral compass' is dangerously awry.