Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
With Trans Rights, and Same Sex Marriage paradigm (Read 292 times)
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21580
A cat with a view
With Trans Rights, and Same Sex Marriage paradigm
Aug 27th, 2019 at 4:18pm
 

....up a    sh it    creek without a paddle.



IMAGE.....
...


"Governor vows to block order to pay for $20,000–$30,000 surgery for inmate convicted of sexually abusing 15-year-old boy."





WWW search....
Court Orders Idaho To Pay For Sex Offender’s Trans Surgery; Governor Refuses




With Trans Rights, and the Same Sex Marriage paradigm now widely accepted in society, this where the enlightened Western nations are headed, 'culturally'.

i.e.
We're headed up a    sh it    creek without a paddle.

And all other world cultures must be looking at us, and sniggering at the decadent West, behind their raised hands.


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
SerialBrain9
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2071
Re: With Trans Rights, and Same Sex Marriage paradigm
Reply #1 - Aug 27th, 2019 at 4:39pm
 
Quote:
THE LEFT IS INSANE… NBC NEWS Report: “Heterosexuality Is Just Not Working”

A new report on NBC News by radical feminist Marcie Bianco argues that “heterosexuality is just not working

And NBC News is promoting this like it is some thoughtful revelation.

Women are increasingly opting out of heterosexuality because it is “the bedrock of their global oppression,” NBC News asserted in a bizarre opinion piece this week.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

“Men need heterosexuality to maintain their societal dominance over women,” writes Marcie Bianco for the NBC News website. “Women, on the other hand, are increasingly realizing not only that they don’t need heterosexuality, but that it also is often the bedrock of their global oppression.”  Cheesy

Ms. Bianco lumps together a series of recent news stories, “from Jeffrey Epstein to the Dayton and El Paso mass shooters, to Miley Cyrus’s separation and Julianne Hough’s declaration that she’s ‘not straight,’” which, she says, “together have laid bare the strictures of an American patriarchy on the edge of a nervous breakdown.”

This isn’t thoughtful discourse.
This is insanity and NBC News is promoting it like it is something brilliant and deep which it is not.

Here’s more from lunatic Marcie Bianco and NBC News:

Framed differently, the picture is this: Men need heterosexuality to maintain their societal dominance over women. Women, on the other hand, are increasingly realizing not only that they don’t need heterosexuality, but that it also is often the bedrock of their global oppression.

Patriarchy is at its most potent when oppression doesn’t feel like oppression, or when it is packaged in terms of biology, religion or basic social needs like security comfort, acceptance and success. Heterosexuality offers women all these things as selling points to their consensual subjection.  Cheesy

Historically, women have been conditioned to believe that heterosexuality is natural or innate, just as they have been conditioned to believe that their main purpose is to make babies — and if they fail to do so, they are condemned as not “real,” or as bad, women.  Cheesy

Celebrities are not always at the vanguard of feminist thought, but both Julianne Hough and Miley Cyrus have recently spoken out about sexuality in ways that puts the power — and responsibility — back into their own hands.

Democrats always pretend to be pro-science when their views are the opposite of natural order.


https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/miley-cyrus-split-liam-hemsworth-isn-t-jus...
Back to top
 

Beware the Fury of a Patient Man.
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Online


#FightStupid

Posts: 16871
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: With Trans Rights, and Same Sex Marriage paradigm
Reply #2 - Aug 28th, 2019 at 6:44am
 
I thought you conservatards were all about the rule of law?

If this was court-ordered, should you not be in support of following the law?

Challenge the ruling using the legal pathways sure, but vowing without question to refuse the court order, that's the sort of thing you'd get a rage boner over Obama or Clinton doing.

Judge not?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print