Quote:


Boom!

How anyone can believe the rubbish that we have been feed on AGW after all that has been revealed is astonishing.

a. climategate

b. the hot spot

c. Correlation

d. disasters, sea levels rising and many more

Its very simple really you do not have to be a professor of physics all you have to do is look into our history to see where CO2 and the average mean global temperature have correlated.

Good hunting.

Wake up people or we will all be taxed for the free air we breathe.

The entire southern hemisphere has only had 10 thermometer stations continuously measuring temperatures from 1880 to now. It is physically impossible to accurately measure the temperature of 98,468,497 sq mi with 10 thermometers.

Graphic showing thermometer stations in southern hemisphere 1880-2019


Phil Jones: “For much of the SH between 40 and 60S the normals are mostly made up as there is very little ship data there”

"Tom,
        The issue Ray alludes to is that in addition to the issue
      of many more drifters providing measurements over the last
      5-10 years, the measurements are coming in from places where
      we didn't have much ship data in the past. For much of the SH
      between 40 and 60S the normals are mostly made up as there is
      very little ship data there.
        Whatever causes the divergence in your plot it is down to
      the ocean.
        You could try doing an additional plot. Download from
      the CRU web site the series for SH land. It doesn't matter if
      is from CRUTEM3 or CRUTEM3v (the former would be better). If that
      still has the divergence, then it is the oceans causing the
      problem. What you're seeing is too rapid to be real.
      Cheers
      Phil"

part of email 2729

http://di2.nu/foia/foia2011/mail/2729.txt

I blame Joe Hockey Stick - you?

For those that are saying these graphs aren’t measuring the same thing, I ask why……?

Mann and associates initially studied tree rings from the northern hemisphere and later extended their research with other proxies most still from the northern hemisphere.

So even though they are reluctant to hand over their work (one paper based on northern hemisphere proxies) to other scientist for scrutiny most of their work is based on proxies from the northern hemisphere.

Mann and associates conveniently got rid of the medieval warm period and the little ice age.

And the IPCC have taken this one paper and made it their own in their weak attempt to prove that AGW is the reason we have heated up all due to man’s burning of fossil fuels.

Funny thing is they (Mann & associates) will not hand over their work to other scientists for scrutiny, you would think that if they wanted to prove their case they would be shoving it under people’s noses, knowing that they are right.

Maybe it’s a case of secret scientist business.....?

There are hundreds of other papers by other scientist that have done their own research with proxies that show the medieval warm period was warmer than today and that we had a mini ice age too, infact many of these papers have proven that the medieval warm period and the little ice age where global and not confined to the northern hemisphere.

That’s hundreds of papers from other prominent scientists.

Yet the IPCC for some strange reason ignores them.

These other scientists that have proven the medieval warm period and the little ice age existed  have put their work out there for all to see, that’s how science works right, you think you have proven something well here it is boys and girls go for it prove me wrong.

So then you have to ask yourself why do you believe in one paper which hasn’t been distributed to the scientific community for observations over hundreds that say the opposite and are out there for all to see as easy as picking fruit of a tree.

Ladies and gentlemen what you are witnessing here is the dishonesty of the alarmists, you have to ask yourself,

WHY WONT THEY HAND OVER THEIR WORK….!

Another question you people should be asking is why has one paper which the computations of have not been freely distributed to the scientific community has been adopted by the IPCC over the hundreds of contradictory papers that are out there, free for all to see.

The IPCC uses one paper which is in dispute with the many hundreds out there as the graphs below show.

They (the IPCC) did show the medieval warm period and the little ice age in there papers up to the year 2001 and then replcade the many with the one.......!?!?

Ask yourselves why is this SO..........!!

Where is the consensus on this issue..........!!!!

Johnnie wrote on Aug 28^th, 2019 at 7:41pm:



You mean the one with the 500 year resolution?

You are trying to infer a CO2 level that is far less than the resolution petal.

Then of course CO2 LAGS temperature by 800 years if you believe the ice cores.

Johnnie wrote on Aug 28^th, 2019 at 9:08pm:


You mean the one whereby Michael E Mann was supposed to show his workings to the court when he sought an adjournment of the defamation trial? The court granted that adjournment on that basis. Michael E Mann subsequently didn't do what he was supposed to do and so the case was lost by him.

Next on the list the court case of Mann V Steyn, where Steyn has countersued Mann. Mann has gone "vewwy,vewwy quiet" (hat tip to Bugs Bunny.)

Of course it could always be a trend caused by a rogue slug crawling across the page.

lee wrote on Aug 28^th, 2019 at 9:19pm:

Even you are starting to question yourself, the evidence is insurmountable.