Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 43
Send Topic Print
Has there been a more outrageous porky here? (Read 56075 times)
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 46154
Gender: male
Re: Has there been a more outrageous porky here?
Reply #135 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 7:04pm
 
Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 4:55pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 4:38pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 1:00am:
Frank wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 7:01pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 6:00pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 5:26pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 4:17pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 3:14pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 3:13pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 1:42pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 1:36pm:
freediver wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 8:28am:
Brian do you have the right or ability to criticise Muslims, Islam or Muslim countries?


When you answer my questions, I might answer yours, FD.   Roll Eyes

Have you ever criticised Islam on here Brian?


Yes.  However, I don't bang on about it continuously unlike Islamophobes like you do, Hammer.    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

However you do bang on about Christianity like a Christianophobe.


No. I bang on about Christianity like someone who dislikes the hypocrisy of the Christians when they condemn the Muslims.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes

I bang on about Islam and I'm an atheist. Don't jump to conclusions Bwian.


You don't attack the Christians at all, Hammer.  You have defended them.  You are a Christophile it seems.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes


Who are the Christians killing in the name of Christianity, Bwian, who should therefore be attacked by Hammer or me or anyone else??
What is the Christian equivalent of Islamic jihadi ethnic cleansing of Christians in our time?



You? You're one of those Brethren types Homo wants to send BACK TO WHERE THEY CAME FROM.

Nothing personal, you understand, we just find you people inherently repugnant.

I mean this in the nicest possible way.

I feel the same way about you people. We're even.


Australians?

Yes, I suppose you do. You want to send us BACK TO WHERE WE CAME FROM, no?

Here I am, Homo. I'm back!



You are a Paki, Abu Karnal, everyone knows that.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Has there been a more outrageous porky here?
Reply #136 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 7:28pm
 
freediver wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 6:38pm:
The thing about the Taliban treating women no worse than the Saudis, is that just you presenting the facts?


I certainly did present some facts - the guardian system, the near-complete isolation of women from the outside world, the fact that the vast majority are unemployed because of the restrictions applied to them. I also mentioned the women being tortured for speaking out against human rights abuses. And I may also have mentioned their genocide in Yemen.

None of these you dispute of course, because it is common knowledge. Nothing I said about Saudi Arabia is transparent bullshit like your claim about little pre-schoolers being shot in the back of the head for reading the wrong stuff.

But please FD, please keep lecturing me about "presenting the facts" - you have so much credibility on the subject now.

Quote:
Why are you so eager to talk up the Taliban and talk down the Saudi administration? Is it because the Saudis decline to kill Americans at every opportunity?


Its not about talking one up, its about putting them both in their rightful place at the very bottom of the moral ladder. The taliban are scum, as are the Saudi regime. Personally I think they are as bad as each other, and its spineless apologism to say one is better than the other - in terms of their treatment of women. Not to mention a massive insult to Saudi women.

Also, Saudis don't kill Americans at every opportunity because the Americans are bending over to them and not invading their country - selling them genocide weapons and fueling their warplanes en-route to bomb schools and hospitals. Interestingly enough, the taliban weren't "killing Americans at every opportunity" before they were invaded either. On the contrary, they were sending emisaries to them to beg them to build gas pipelines in their country and wanting trade deals and diplomatic recognition.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49004
At my desk.
Re: Has there been a more outrageous porky here?
Reply #137 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 7:32pm
 
Quote:
None of these you dispute of course, because it is common knowledge. Nothing I said about Saudi Arabia is transparent bullshit like your claim about little pre-schoolers being shot in the back of the head for reading the wrong stuff.


The bit about them treating women no better than the Taliban was transparent BS.

You often go after the Saudis. I have never seen you make any effort to defend them. Yet here you are defending the Taliban, and prior to ISIS no-one would have raised an eyebrow if you called them the worst Islamofascist regime in the world. Except you and Abu perhaps. He also liked to defend the Taliban for some reason. He went to great lengths to explain that they really did want to educate girls, they just didn't have the money.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Has there been a more outrageous porky here?
Reply #138 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 8:31pm
 
freediver wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 7:32pm:
The bit about them treating women no better than the Taliban was transparent BS.


Sure, based on your BS fairy tales about pre-schoolers getting shot in the back of the head for reading the wrong stuff - in a "widespread" and "activey enforced policy" no less. Do you have any actual facts you can present to demonstrate that the Saudis treat women better than the taliban did?

freediver wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 7:32pm:
Yet here you are defending the Taliban


I have done nothing of the sort. I call out blatant transparent lies when I see them. Even when its levelled against a mob who are already terrible. And what you said FD, was a blatant, transparent lie - done in the name of cheerleading for warmongering. Warmongering that hurts your beloved Afghani women more than anyone else.

freediver wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 7:32pm:
You often go after the Saudis. I have never seen you make any effort to defend them.


The Saudis push school girls back into burning buildings because they are dressed immodestly. They behead maids who defend themselves against abusive masters. They export terrorists into Syria to slaughter christians and any other minority you can think of, and then send them money and weapons. But even worse than this, they wage actual genocide in Yemen, and routinely bomb schools and hospitals. 10s of thousands of Yemenis are now on the brink of starvation thanks to the Saudi led blockade. There is probably not a greater humanitarian disaster in the world today. The Saudis are an economic superpower in the region, and they, along with their rich Gulf puppets, are using their enormous wealth to fund terrorism and wage proxy wars against Iran - all over the region. They are a huge destabilising force in an already volatile region. They are, in short, an incredibly dangerous regime not just to their own people, but the entire region. There is no country in the world who needs to be called out for and criticised more than the Saudis - imo - literally for the sake of world peace.

But apparently you think we should just apologise for them.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Bias_2012
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10766
Gender: male
Re: Has there been a more outrageous porky here?
Reply #139 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 8:46pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 2:07pm:
Bias_2012 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 12:54pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 12:30pm:
Secret Wars wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 9:44am:
In another few more years of concerted efforts by the apologists and cultists ISIS will be elevated to a faith based alternative housing and aid project.   Grin Grin

Setting fire to people and slitting throats will be censored out of existence and if mentioned the first thing the apologist will ask for is ref? smug in the knowledge that like Greggs post it has already been removed, and the second thing they will do is deny the reference.

What’s worse though the apologist will know that evidence of ISIS and Islamic atrocities once existed,but apologism and megaphone sized virtue announcing is much, much important to an apologist than any attempt at honest discourse.


Why does your Islamophobia prevent you from understanding that there are many different types of Muslims?  There are the nasty ones - the Islamists.  There are the moderate ones - the overwhelming majority of Muslims.  There are Sunni, there are Sh'ite, there are Wahabbis, there are Alawites, there are Sufis, etc., etc.  To you, they appear from your language that you consider them all one and the same.  Why?   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

.


And the nasty ones are killing, slashing and raping Aussies, but you couldn't give a shyt could you? And where did those nasty ones emerge from? From the Sunni, Sh'ite, Wahabbis, Alawites, Sufis moderate muslim mainstream of course


And does that make the non-nasty ones who make the majority of the Sunni, Sh'ite, Wahabbis, Alawites, Sufis moderate muslim mainstream, guilty of anything other than sharing a religious name with the nasty ones?  Really?  If so, perhaps we should examine all the nasty Christians versus the non-nasty Christians (and yes, there have been in the last ~2019 years quite a shedload of nasty Christians out there)?  Perhaps we need to examine the murderers, the rapists, the paedophiles, the kidnappers, etc.?   Or are you just going to try and justify the persecution of an religious group just 'cause they are Muslim, hey?   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


You can't get it through your head - Christian atrocities are no excuse for muslims to keep committing atrocities.
Two wrongs don't make a right
Back to top
 

Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 137411
Gender: male
Re: Has there been a more outrageous porky here?
Reply #140 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 8:50pm
 
Bias_2012 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 8:46pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 2:07pm:
Bias_2012 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 12:54pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 12:30pm:
[quote author=Secret_Wars link=1567134066/118#118 date=1567467851]In another few more years of concerted efforts by the apologists and cultists ISIS will be elevated to a faith based alternative housing and aid project.   Grin Grin

Setting fire to people and slitting throats will be censored out of existence and if mentioned the first thing the apologist will ask for is ref? smug in the knowledge that like Greggs post it has already been removed, and the second thing they will do is deny the reference.

What’s worse though the apologist will know that evidence of ISIS and Islamic atrocities once existed,but apologism and megaphone sized virtue announcing is much, much important to an apologist than any attempt at honest discourse.


Why does your Islamophobia prevent you from understanding that there are many different types of Muslims?  There are the nasty ones - the Islamists.  There are the moderate ones - the overwhelming majority of Muslims.  There are Sunni, there are Sh'ite, there are Wahabbis, there are Alawites, there are Sufis, etc., etc.  To you, they appear from your language that you consider them all one and the same.  Why?   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

.


And the nasty ones are killing, slashing and raping Aussies, but you couldn't give a shyt could you? And where did those nasty ones emerge from? From the Sunni, Sh'ite, Wahabbis, Alawites, Sufis moderate muslim mainstream of course


And does that make the non-nasty ones who make the majority of the Sunni, Sh'ite, Wahabbis, Alawites, Sufis moderate muslim mainstream, guilty of anything other than sharing a religious name with the nasty ones?  Really?  If so, perhaps we should examine all the nasty Christians versus the non-nasty Christians (and yes, there have been in the last ~2019 years quite a shedload of nasty Christians out there)?  Perhaps we need to examine the murderers, the rapists, the paedophiles, the kidnappers, etc.?   Or are you just going to try and justify the persecution of an religious group just 'cause they are Muslim, hey?   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



You can't get it through your head - ISIS atrocities are no excuse for Christians to keep committing atrocities.
Two wrongs don't make a right.

To be fair though, two Wrights made an airplane.

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 41825
Re: Has there been a more outrageous porky here?
Reply #141 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 9:05pm
 
Bias_2012 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 8:46pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 2:07pm:
Bias_2012 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 12:54pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 12:30pm:
Secret Wars wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 9:44am:
In another few more years of concerted efforts by the apologists and cultists ISIS will be elevated to a faith based alternative housing and aid project.   Grin Grin

Setting fire to people and slitting throats will be censored out of existence and if mentioned the first thing the apologist will ask for is ref? smug in the knowledge that like Greggs post it has already been removed, and the second thing they will do is deny the reference.

What’s worse though the apologist will know that evidence of ISIS and Islamic atrocities once existed,but apologism and megaphone sized virtue announcing is much, much important to an apologist than any attempt at honest discourse.


Why does your Islamophobia prevent you from understanding that there are many different types of Muslims?  There are the nasty ones - the Islamists.  There are the moderate ones - the overwhelming majority of Muslims.  There are Sunni, there are Sh'ite, there are Wahabbis, there are Alawites, there are Sufis, etc., etc.  To you, they appear from your language that you consider them all one and the same.  Why?   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

.


And the nasty ones are killing, slashing and raping Aussies, but you couldn't give a shyt could you? And where did those nasty ones emerge from? From the Sunni, Sh'ite, Wahabbis, Alawites, Sufis moderate muslim mainstream of course


And does that make the non-nasty ones who make the majority of the Sunni, Sh'ite, Wahabbis, Alawites, Sufis moderate muslim mainstream, guilty of anything other than sharing a religious name with the nasty ones?  Really?  If so, perhaps we should examine all the nasty Christians versus the non-nasty Christians (and yes, there have been in the last ~2019 years quite a shedload of nasty Christians out there)?  Perhaps we need to examine the murderers, the rapists, the paedophiles, the kidnappers, etc.?   Or are you just going to try and justify the persecution of an religious group just 'cause they are Muslim, hey?   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


You can't get it through your head - Christian atrocities are no excuse for muslims to keep committing atrocities.
Two wrongs don't make a right


Who ever claimed the opposite?  What is required is for Christians to admit the errors of their ways and admit that their religion has as bloody a history as Islam does.  Simples really and something you seem to keep avoiding for some reason, tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bias_2012
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10766
Gender: male
Re: Has there been a more outrageous porky here?
Reply #142 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 9:26pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 9:05pm:
Who ever claimed the opposite?  What is required is for Christians to admit the errors of their ways and admit that their religion has as bloody a history as Islam does.  Simples really and something you seem to keep avoiding for some reason


Not avoiding it at all. I'm saying Christian atrocities are no excuse for muslims to keep committing atrocities

Just because Christians commit atrocities, doesn't mean muslims should commit atrocities


Back to top
 

Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 41825
Re: Has there been a more outrageous porky here?
Reply #143 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 9:42pm
 
Bias_2012 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 9:26pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 9:05pm:
Who ever claimed the opposite?  What is required is for Christians to admit the errors of their ways and admit that their religion has as bloody a history as Islam does.  Simples really and something you seem to keep avoiding for some reason


Not avoiding it at all. I'm saying Christian atrocities are no excuse for muslims to keep committing atrocities

Just because Christians commit atrocities, doesn't mean muslims should commit atrocities


And as I keep pointing out, no one has claimed it does, except you.  Funny that - you erecting continually a strawman argument.   You going to admit that Christianity has a long, bloody, brutal history leading right up to today?   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49004
At my desk.
Re: Has there been a more outrageous porky here?
Reply #144 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 9:48pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 8:31pm:
freediver wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 7:32pm:
The bit about them treating women no better than the Taliban was transparent BS.


Sure, based on your BS fairy tales about pre-schoolers getting shot in the back of the head for reading the wrong stuff - in a "widespread" and "activey enforced policy" no less. Do you have any actual facts you can present to demonstrate that the Saudis treat women better than the taliban did?


In 2015, 52 percent of all university graduates in Saudi Arabia were female.

Do you really think I am the only one who considers the Taliban to be particularly bad, even by Muslim standards? And what is it with Muslims like you and Abu feeling compelled to defend the Taliban and attack the Saudis?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95729
Gender: male
Re: Has there been a more outrageous porky here?
Reply #145 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 10:05pm
 
Frank wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 7:04pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 4:55pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 4:38pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 1:00am:
Frank wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 7:01pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 6:00pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 5:26pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 4:17pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 3:14pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 3:13pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 1:42pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 1:36pm:
freediver wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 8:28am:
Brian do you have the right or ability to criticise Muslims, Islam or Muslim countries?


When you answer my questions, I might answer yours, FD.   Roll Eyes

Have you ever criticised Islam on here Brian?


Yes.  However, I don't bang on about it continuously unlike Islamophobes like you do, Hammer.    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

However you do bang on about Christianity like a Christianophobe.


No. I bang on about Christianity like someone who dislikes the hypocrisy of the Christians when they condemn the Muslims.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes

I bang on about Islam and I'm an atheist. Don't jump to conclusions Bwian.


You don't attack the Christians at all, Hammer.  You have defended them.  You are a Christophile it seems.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes


Who are the Christians killing in the name of Christianity, Bwian, who should therefore be attacked by Hammer or me or anyone else??
What is the Christian equivalent of Islamic jihadi ethnic cleansing of Christians in our time?



You? You're one of those Brethren types Homo wants to send BACK TO WHERE THEY CAME FROM.

Nothing personal, you understand, we just find you people inherently repugnant.

I mean this in the nicest possible way.

I feel the same way about you people. We're even.


Australians?

Yes, I suppose you do. You want to send us BACK TO WHERE WE CAME FROM, no?

Here I am, Homo. I'm back!



You are a Paki, Abu Karnal, everyone knows that.



You're more Pakistani than silly old Karnal Abu, dear boy. We grew here, you flew here.

Sovereignty, innit.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95729
Gender: male
Re: Has there been a more outrageous porky here?
Reply #146 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 10:12pm
 
freediver wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 6:38pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 2:44pm:
Bias_2012 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 12:41pm:
Taliban treatment of women

In October 1996, a woman had the tip of her thumb cut off for wearing nail varnish.

In May 1997, five female CARE International employees with authorisation from the Ministry of the Interior to conduct research for an emergency feeding programme were forced from their vehicle by members of the religious police. The guards used a public address system to insult and harass the women before striking them with a metal and leather whip over 1.5 meters (almost 5 feet) in length.

When a Taliban raid discovered a woman running an informal school in her apartment, they beat the children and threw the woman down a flight of stairs (breaking her leg) and then imprisoned her. They threatened to stone her family publicly if she refused to sign a declaration of loyalty to the Taliban and their laws.

An Afghan girl named Bibi Aisha was promised to a new family through a tribal method of solving disputes known as baad. When she fled the violence girls often suffer under baad, her new family found her, and a Taliban commander ordered her punished as an example, "lest other girls in the village try to do the same thing".[31] Her ears and nose were cut off and she was left for dead in the mountains, but survived.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taliban_treatment_of_women


No porkies here



See that FD? This is how you do it. Bias presents the facts, nothing more, nothing less. He doesn't feel the need to embelish these facts with his own inventions.

And as we can see here, the facts are more than adequate to condemn the taliban.

What made you think that the taliban were not bad enough that it was necessary to invent lies about them?

Well done bias - a fact based critique of muslims. Curiously rare around here.


The thing about the Taliban treating women no worse than the Saudis, is that just you presenting the facts?

Why are you so eager to talk up the Taliban and talk down the Saudi administration? Is it because the Saudis decline to kill Americans at every opportunity?


Apart from September 11?

Good point, FD. So typical of that dastardly G.

Now which other devout Muselman here spinelesly apologised for Sept 11?

Will you say?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 46154
Gender: male
Re: Has there been a more outrageous porky here?
Reply #147 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 10:18pm
 
Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 10:05pm:
Frank wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 7:04pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 4:55pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 4:38pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 1:00am:
Frank wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 7:01pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 6:00pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 5:26pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 4:17pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 3:14pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 3:13pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 1:42pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 1:36pm:
freediver wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 8:28am:
Brian do you have the right or ability to criticise Muslims, Islam or Muslim countries?


When you answer my questions, I might answer yours, FD.   Roll Eyes

Have you ever criticised Islam on here Brian?


Yes.  However, I don't bang on about it continuously unlike Islamophobes like you do, Hammer.    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

However you do bang on about Christianity like a Christianophobe.


No. I bang on about Christianity like someone who dislikes the hypocrisy of the Christians when they condemn the Muslims.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes

I bang on about Islam and I'm an atheist. Don't jump to conclusions Bwian.


You don't attack the Christians at all, Hammer.  You have defended them.  You are a Christophile it seems.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes


Who are the Christians killing in the name of Christianity, Bwian, who should therefore be attacked by Hammer or me or anyone else??
What is the Christian equivalent of Islamic jihadi ethnic cleansing of Christians in our time?



You? You're one of those Brethren types Homo wants to send BACK TO WHERE THEY CAME FROM.

Nothing personal, you understand, we just find you people inherently repugnant.

I mean this in the nicest possible way.

I feel the same way about you people. We're even.


Australians?

Yes, I suppose you do. You want to send us BACK TO WHERE WE CAME FROM, no?

Here I am, Homo. I'm back!



You are a Paki, Abu Karnal, everyone knows that.



You're more Pakistani than silly old Karnal Abu, dear boy. We grew here, you flew here.

Sovereignty, innit.

Abu = Paki.

You Abu, you Paki.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95729
Gender: male
Re: Has there been a more outrageous porky here?
Reply #148 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 10:29pm
 
freediver wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 9:48pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 8:31pm:
freediver wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 7:32pm:
The bit about them treating women no better than the Taliban was transparent BS.


Sure, based on your BS fairy tales about pre-schoolers getting shot in the back of the head for reading the wrong stuff - in a "widespread" and "activey enforced policy" no less. Do you have any actual facts you can present to demonstrate that the Saudis treat women better than the taliban did?


In 2015, 52 percent of all university graduates in Saudi Arabia were female.


G, I really think you need a Wiki to keep track of all this spineless snivelling.

These quotes are gold.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95729
Gender: male
Re: Has there been a more outrageous porky here?
Reply #149 - Sep 3rd, 2019 at 10:44pm
 
Frank wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 10:18pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 10:05pm:
Frank wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 7:04pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 4:55pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 4:38pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2019 at 1:00am:
Frank wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 7:01pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 6:00pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 5:26pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 4:17pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 3:14pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 3:13pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 1:42pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 1:36pm:
freediver wrote on Sep 2nd, 2019 at 8:28am:
Brian do you have the right or ability to criticise Muslims, Islam or Muslim countries?


When you answer my questions, I might answer yours, FD.   Roll Eyes

Have you ever criticised Islam on here Brian?


Yes.  However, I don't bang on about it continuously unlike Islamophobes like you do, Hammer.    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

However you do bang on about Christianity like a Christianophobe.


No. I bang on about Christianity like someone who dislikes the hypocrisy of the Christians when they condemn the Muslims.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes

I bang on about Islam and I'm an atheist. Don't jump to conclusions Bwian.


You don't attack the Christians at all, Hammer.  You have defended them.  You are a Christophile it seems.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes


Who are the Christians killing in the name of Christianity, Bwian, who should therefore be attacked by Hammer or me or anyone else??
What is the Christian equivalent of Islamic jihadi ethnic cleansing of Christians in our time?



You? You're one of those Brethren types Homo wants to send BACK TO WHERE THEY CAME FROM.

Nothing personal, you understand, we just find you people inherently repugnant.

I mean this in the nicest possible way.

I feel the same way about you people. We're even.


Australians?

Yes, I suppose you do. You want to send us BACK TO WHERE WE CAME FROM, no?

Here I am, Homo. I'm back!



You are a Paki, Abu Karnal, everyone knows that.



You're more Pakistani than silly old Karnal Abu, dear boy. We grew here, you flew here.

Sovereignty, innit.

Abu = Paki.

You Abu, you Paki.



A sentence requires a verb in our language, dear boy, but I've picked up a bit of your Pidgeon English myself over the years.

You unassimilated country-shopper, stealie our jobs and tittie birds. Me cunning Aussie, stay to defend culture from brown-lips sht-eater.

Yum yum.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 43
Send Topic Print