freediver wrote on Sep 5
th, 2019 at 10:30am:
Quote:A bullet to the back of the head cetainly would be worse than being an unemployed uni graduate. Whoever said it wasn't FD?
You did when you said the Saudis treat women just as bad as the Taliban.
Funny. That could only be true if the taliban really did shoot little girls in the back of the head for attending school. And we know by your inability to come up with a shred of evidence that they did - and even worse your shamelessly dishonest attempts to blatantly mislead with wholly irrelevant evidence - that it isn't true.
The irony here is that we only know of one factual, documented instance of either regime killing school girls - which was the Saudis when they pushed them back into their burning dormitory for being immodestly dressed.
The problem FD, is that as you always do time and time again, you overreached with what could have been a legitimate criticism, and found yourself neck deep in out and out blatant lies. If you had said the taliban treat girls like crap, made them fear for their lives, and committed the unforgivable sin of banning them going to school - it would have been 100% correct and 100% acceptable. But no, you couldn't do that. Clearly because you committed yourself to the challenge of rubbishing the idea that the Saudis and the taliban were as bad as each other when it came to treatment of women. God knows why. Since you obviously know that the Saudis also treat their women like crap, you had to go one better. Of course you could have said something legitimate like 'well at least the Saudis don't ban girls from going to school - the taliban do' - would have been a great argument. Alas though, you resort to porkies. And when you go for porkies, you sure do go big. So it wasn't just that the taliban were known to shoot little girls in the head for attending school (which they weren't) - no, it was "widespread" and an "actively enforced policy" no less.
Arguably your pathetic attempts to pass off insurgent bombs that happened a decade later, or the case of Malala in Pakistan as somehow good proof of your claim was worse than the porky itself. Naturally you respond in your usual fashion - hysterically lashing out at taliban apologists and the usual "typical muslim" ad-homs.
Isn't it funny how every single one of the discussions you are involved in seem to end up this exact same way?