Well if she was only 8, the muzzies would have followed muhammads example:

altamatu’a bil almufakhaza (pleasure from sexual contact with her thighs),

altamatu’a bil almuka’aba (pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts),

altamatu’a bil alsagirah (pleasure from sexual contact with a baby girl),

altamatu’a bil alradi’ah, (pleasure from sexual contact with a suckling female infant),

“Mufakhazat Alzigaar,”  all different styles practiced on the female child by placing the male erected penis in different parts of the child’s body for getting sexual pleasure.

No wonder the loony leftards love islam so much.

Karnal wrote on Sep 6^th, 2019 at 10:20pm:


I'm not sure what is more shocking - Frank's blatant porky, or FD thinking there's nothing wrong with it and whose only response is to attack someone else.

polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 9^th, 2019 at 2:40pm:


Do you think Wikipedia is being misleading by saying they risked execution if it never happened at all?

freediver wrote on Sep 9^th, 2019 at 6:41pm:


I think it is, FD. Wikipedia has clearly censored the bit about the actively-enforced Taliban policy of shooting 8 year old girls in the back of the head for being in a classroom.

Wikipedia must be pro-Taliban too eh?

The Abu-karnal-gandalf-Bwian axis is forever kvetching about procedural minutiae - was she 8 or 12, was she 6 pr 9, was she violated, shot in the head, from the back or the front, can people make laws or has Allah prescribed all laws already for eternity, etc, etc.  They argue, in short, aabout all the contingencies of islam and endlessly string out meaningless arguments about detail IN ORDER to avoid the substance of Islam IsIalm.

The rest of us are point out, repeatedly, that the IDEOLOGY  (substance) of Islam is anti-Western in all its aspects, and devotees of Islam cannot be devotees of what the West stands for.

We see this every day but the axis denies it on the grounds of irrelevant technical details and furphies ('vast majority, tiny minority' etc.


Islam is NOT for the betterment of Western civilisation - the fruit of a long unfolding - but for its replacements with Islam - a totally anti-Western and therefore anti-freedom and inhumane submissive, oppressive ideology.

Still no mention or denunciation of the evil in the Bible which causes and motivates Christians to kill little girls in the name of Yahweh.

Only gnashing of teeth and wailing rivers of crocodile tears, because some one denied the atrocities committed by the Christians.

Self righteous hypocrisy at its worst.   

freediver wrote on Sep 9^th, 2019 at 6:41pm:


not really. Though what I think I can say for certain is that the person who made that claim didn't have a "widespread" and "actively enforced policy" of executing little girls in mind. The point was a general one about the taliban's hostility to girl's schooling, as well as there propensity to violence - and the obvious risk this posed to girls who. No one is disputing that, and no one is apologising for that.

What abolutely *IS* misleading though is to somehow use that general point as proof that they had a "widespread" and "actively enforced policy" of shooting little girls in the head for going to school or reading.

What you would expect if such a policy existed was for your "evidence" to actually say so. Accounts of it happening, anecdote of even a single execution... alas nothing. Literally the only account of anything happening to anyone in either of your articles was the statement that teachers (not even students) were known to be gaoled and/or tortured for teaching girls.