Quote:


If FD was not lying, he would not still be flailing around not producing any shred of evidence for his BS claim. He tries to convince us of his claim by citing stuff that happened over a decade after the fact, and reference to the most vague statement that girls "risked execution" for attending school.

There are in fact several layers to his lie - not just the original BS claim, but his attempts to fob us off with patently absurd 'evidence' that it happened.

Do you know of this "widespread" and "actively enforced policy" of lining up little school girls and toddlers and shooting them in the back of the head for attending school/reading non-Quranic material?

Bias_2012 wrote on Sep 10^th, 2019 at 1:34pm:


I agree. There is more than enough truth to condemn the taliban with. And yet FD evidently doesn't believe the truth is enough and he feels the need to invent porkies about them. Why do you think he does that?

polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 10^th, 2019 at 9:19am:

As every Islamist knows, whether jihadist with warfare or jihadist with law-fare or jihadist on social media, you don't have to 'shoot all of them in the head' to to teach all of them a lesson.

Are girls fearful of going to school where the Taliban operates? yes.
Islamist policy objective greatly advanced.

Are people afraid to satirise Mohammed and Islam? Yes.
Ditto.

Constant threats of lawsuits for 'Islamophobia' resulting in self-censorship? Yes.
Ditto.

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 9^th, 2019 at 9:17pm:

Submission to Allah and Mohammed are irreconcilable with Western secular liberalism, freedom of conscience and speech, freedom of association, including freedom from religion.  The endless idiotic chanting about islamophobia is but one obvious evidence  of the incompatibility of open criticism and free speech with Islam.

Secular liberal Muslims supporting the West are NOT pro-Islam and are really correctly called lapsed Muslims (what Muslims call apostates but we don't want them to be killed or maimed by their more orthodox co-religionists).

Frank wrote on Sep 10^th, 2019 at 6:51pm:


I see. So the Taliban didn't actually shoot any 8 year old girls in the back of the head. They just scared them a bit.

Good show, old boy. There's that intelligence and integrity again.

The FD/old boy axis. Shameless propaganda, innit.

Frank wrote on Sep 10^th, 2019 at 11:07pm:


Oh, old boy, you've just outed yourself as one of the biggest fakes here. Not only are you soaking in propaganda, you make it up yourself.

Your always absolutely never ever ruse has been exposed. You don't discriminate between murderers or 8 year olds, executions or random shootings, Muslims or the tinted races, but one thing we now know.

You absolutely always never ever discriminate between the Taliban and the Saudis. How's that for propaganda?

Gobsmacking? Oh, G...

polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 11^th, 2019 at 9:05am:


I was not lying and claimed what you are now trying to twist, knowingly.  My post had pictures from the Wikipedia article on women's treatment by the Taliban in Afghanistan. I also posted an article from Time.
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1567134066/246#246

Malala Yousufzai WAS shot in the head by the Taliban FOR going to school. We have pictures only of the result, not the act. But I did ask, re 'you idiotic ddissembling about policy, whether the shooter was ever repri,anded by the Taliban by going rougue, as you idiotically try to insinuate. The answer is no. he was carrying out Talioban policy. See also https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/21/world/asia/taliban-girls-schools.html

The Taliban DO mistreat women, they DO attack schools, the DO kill schoolgirls. And not only in Afghanistan but in Paki's homeland (Peshawar massacre) as well. And the Talibs are not alone. Chechen jihadis have proven themselves to be as bloodthirsty and evil in Veslan and elsewhere.


And you have the hide and the cheek (hide 'n cheek  ) to act miffed, as if the gruesome jihadis have been miswepwesented and their good name besmirched.i