philperth2010 wrote on Sep 5^th, 2019 at 9:19pm:
So she didnt "show threats" at all as i said. She alleged threats were made, 2 different things. Like I said, you really need to stop focusing on the emotion and read the actual factual information supplied.

Karnal wrote on Sep 5^th, 2019 at 10:42pm:


**coughs** the government wasn't dragged into the family home - it leapt into the fray with both feet... it's a policy with an agenda....

The agenda is 'there is no power outside of government'... and (you have none).... and 'all right to violence resides with the government'.....  **coughs**  **coughs**

freediver wrote on Sep 5^th, 2019 at 11:02pm:


Indeed. An exclusionary AVO would of course have that effect. Usually, the cops start with the standard one not to "threaten, intimidate or harass". It would apply to his partner, as cops don't muck around with any alleged abuse of kids.

A stepdad alleged to have sexually abused his kids would be given an automatic exclusionary AVO.

I know of a father who had an exclusionary AVO slapped on him by his daughter. She told her teacher that she feared going home after she lost some keys and upset her dad.

What would he do?

She didn't know, she just didn't "feel safe". She came from a strict Hindu family.

Has he hit you before?

No, but he was so angry he might.

The school called the cops. 

Dad couldn't go within a hundred meters of his daughter until it made court, a few weeks later. By then, the cops had calmed down. But by then, the daughter was refusing to go home. She'd moved in with her boyfriend and his family. Worse, she'd gotten pregnant. She was 14.

Dad wanted his daughter home, but he wasn't allowed to know anything due to "confidentiality".

Then the girl told all these porkies about her older brother getting her up the duff, even though he was in India at the time. She pretended she didnt know how you get pregnant.

Dad wasn't told any of this. He got a lawyer writing letters to everybody. Nothing happened. His daughter refused to return home. Child Protection got involved. It was a right old mess.

But this is the world of modern policing. The state does indeed get involved in micromanaging its citizens' lives, and these stories are becoming more and more common.

Karnal wrote on Sep 6^th, 2019 at 1:09am:
You need to stay off the booze and stop posting bullsh!te.

But that's just me.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 6^th, 2019 at 12:54am:


I don't think so. The government were dragged into dealing with domestic violence. Child Protection is another thing the government became unwillingly responsible for - this was previously managed by the Christian charities.

Politicians like wearing hard hats and turning over the first shovelful of soil on a road project.  Nothing turns voters off more than hearing about a whole lot of complicated social issues the government are getting stuck into. Keep it simple. Nice. Breezy.

Domestic violence and child protection are never good news. All governments can do here is  try to hose down horror stories in the media.

No one cares about white papers or implementing the findings of royal commissions. Then, if you finally do lower crime and DV and child abuse, no one ever notices. There will always be another child death on the front page of the Tele. There will always be another underage Muslim marriage scandal.

Politicians aren't too different to everybody else, dear. Plenty of them just want to blame Islam and call it quits too.

rhino wrote on Sep 6^th, 2019 at 12:00am:


So you believe this bloke never made any threats and the woman was lying about him (really)....You need to accept the fact the death of this child is a result of his father's actions not those of the mother....Why did Government authorities apologise to the woman if her story was fake....Nobody has challenged her story apart from a few woman haters like you???

Quote:




https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-09-04/bradyn-dillons-mother-says-family-fell-th...