mothra wrote on Sep 6
th, 2019 at 9:36am:
freediver wrote on Sep 6
th, 2019 at 9:33am:
My bad. He could have also gotten struck by lightning. But it was her best chance, and removing it neutered any other complaint she might have made.
Are you seriously arguing that the police will only attend if there is an existent AVO?
That intervention can only take place if there is an AVO?
Are you really that ignorant or are you just unwilling to admit you're wrong?
I didn't think he said that at all... just that retaining it was her best chance.. of what I'm not sure, since the 'father' had custody - you seriously need to ask why that would be given the obvious deficiencies of both 'parents'...
The best chance for the kid was to be removed from both... raising the spectre of another 'stolen generation'... governments are staffed by wimps these days and are so afraid of any bad press that they'll bend over backwards to avoid any appearance of overbearing behaviour in any way.
Such is the impasse to which 'social science' has brought us all.... damned if you do and damned if you don't .... but don't take away any personal sovereignty from abusers, female and male...
Again - you have to ask seriously why the kid was not in the custody of his 'mother' - the ovum donor - in the current climate of absolute power to the ovum donor...
Sounds pretty bad to me....