So Trump has gotten himself in so much hot water that it could conceivably be removed from office in trying to get dirt on Biden. The massive irony is that now, the front runner is Elizabeth Warren and any dirt he would have gotten would be worthless.

A moderately smart person would have seen that coming or at least the possibility.  But Trump is not smart. He is not even regulation dumb, but EXTRA dumb.

So the next president will be Elizabeth Warren although it may be Mike Pence briefly:)

Depends on the party analysis, this could give Biden the inside running if he comes out smelling roses.

The accusations against him look to be fallacious.

SerialBrain9 wrote on Sep 29^th, 2019 at 8:17am:


No, let's say he has to enter a writing competition.

You can judge it, dear.

dear Longy,
Trump is your personal saviour.

Without Trump we would already have 4 new wars in the world.

Bow down to him and keep him in your prayers
that God may guide him to a 2020  2nd term.

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 29^th, 2019 at 2:50pm:



http://www.ozpolitic.com/articles/logical-fallacies.html#ad%20hominem




"You are an idiot, therefore you are wrong."

An ad hominem (short for argumentum ad hominem) is a personal attack. It is by far the most common logical fallacy encountered in online forums. It carries the assumption that by discrediting your opponent, you are also discrediting their argument. However, this would lead to the absurd situation that an argument is correct if one person uses it, and false if another uses it. Inexperienced debaters often fall for this and feel the need to defend their reputation against a troll, otherwise it will invalidate the point they are trying to make in the eyes of others.

An ad hominem is not always a logical fallacy. For example, if someone claims that their point of view on a technical issue carries more weight because they are a scientist then it would be reasonable to point out that they did not complete their PhD. It would not be reasonable to point out that they are divorced, or a socialist.

Merely insulting someone is not technically an ad hominem unless it is done in a way that discredits their argument – however, it is still inappropriate.

The opposite fallacy to ad hominem is ‘appeal to authority,’ claiming that the good qualities of a person making an argument support that argument.

No Longy,
you resort to ad hominem abuse because you can't debate anyone.
You're pathetic.

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 29^th, 2019 at 4:57pm:



Longy,
you overestimate your intelligence.
You're not that bright - I'd say you'd have an average IQ of about 100 -
that's little more than a girl in a sandwich shop.

So Weekend will not take up the challenge - it shows that he does not even really believe the bullshit that he writes about Pocahontas.

No one wants her and some DNC supporters have already threatened to vote for Trump if Pocahontas gets the nomination.