Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 
Send Topic Print
A.G.Barr and Durham, " THE STORM IS HERE " (Read 21642 times)
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: A.G.Barr and Durham, " THE STORM IS HERE "
Reply #285 - Dec 10th, 2019 at 8:27pm
 


Geraldo: IG FISA report findings are a cause for concern
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: A.G.Barr and Durham, " THE STORM IS HERE "
Reply #286 - Dec 13th, 2019 at 2:23am
 


Carter Page: We’re taking this case to the Supreme Court
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: A.G.Barr and Durham, " THE STORM IS HERE "
Reply #287 - Dec 13th, 2019 at 9:38am
 


OAN EXCLUSIVE: Yuriy Lutsenko says Yovanovitch perjured herself before Congress


Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58103
Here
Gender: male
Re: A.G.Barr and Durham, " THE STORM IS HERE "
Reply #288 - Dec 13th, 2019 at 7:12pm
 
Looks like a rigged investigation.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: A.G.Barr and Durham, " THE STORM IS HERE "
Reply #289 - Dec 13th, 2019 at 9:50pm
 


Barr Provides Treasure Trove of Info About SpyGate
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58103
Here
Gender: male
Re: A.G.Barr and Durham, " THE STORM IS HERE "
Reply #290 - Dec 13th, 2019 at 10:58pm
 
it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 13th, 2019 at 9:50pm:


Barr Provides Treasure Trove of Info About SpyGate



IG report

Investigation fully justified.
No Spying.
No Bias.

What have you noticed about Barr Recently – He has acted more improperly even than usual ?


Some Of the Claims here:


1)The FBI did spy on the Trump campaign: No they didn't properly justified monitoring by a legal authority is not spying.

2) All the evidence collected was exculpatory - Well three of the four are in Prison today and 2 of the 4 were already under investigation when this investigation started and from before they worked on the campaign.

3) its a big deal to use US law enforcement and intelligence resources to investigate the opposing political party: This never happened - the FBI is not an opposing political party dopey - thought you could sneak that lie in?

4) Papadopoulos expressed that he may have had pre knowledge of Russian Hacking. No that isn't what he said - he said that the Russians had offered the information to the Trump campaign. There were follow up meetings in Trump Tower with the Top of the Trump team. 

5) If people involved give reasonable explanations and he finds no evidence that contradicts this he accepts it. As obviously would any law enforcement group .

6) Horowitz didn’t rule out improper motive it was just that there was no evidence of it. Maybe a blonde thing ? there is no evidence he must be guilty - idiot ?

7) They talked to 4 people involved in the campaign. Yes the 4 people they were investigating - 3 of which are in prison today ?

8) The whole Russia collusion hoax was proven entirely false in the end. Untrue, the Muller finding was that the very substantial proof of interaction between Russia and the Trump team fell short of the bar in terms of provable collusion. Note a number of the Trump witnesses are today in prison for lying to the FBI and obstructing the investigation and that in the report many others are recorded as being untruthful contradicting themselves and that a substantial additional amount of evidence has emerged since the investigation etc.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: A.G.Barr and Durham, " THE STORM IS HERE "
Reply #291 - Dec 14th, 2019 at 8:29pm
 
...

https://www.theepochtimes.com/william-barr-has-suddenly-become-chatty-and-hes-pr...

...
U.S. Attorney General William Barr speaks about the Justice Department's Russia investigation into the 2016 presidential campaign, during the Wall Street Journal's annual CEO Council meeting, at the Four Seasons Hotel on December 10, 2019 in Washington, DC. Mark Wilson/Getty Images

William Barr Has Suddenly Become Chatty—and He’s Provided Quite an Information Dump



Sharyl Attkisson
CONTRIBUTO


December 11, 2019 Updated: December 13, 2019

In each of two video appearances, on NBC News and at Wall Street Journal’s “CEO Council,” Attorney General William Barr provided the same basic information and views about the U.S. intelligence community’s actions against the Trump campaign in 2016 and 2017. A criminal investigation is underway and being led by U.S. Attorney John Durham.

Barr was motivated to make the public statements, he said, by the misreporting and confusion surrounding Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report issued on Dec. 9. It found serious government surveillance abuses but no evidence of political bias on the part of the offending FBI officials and agents.

Below are 24 points Barr felt the need to make after the release of the Horowitz report. (All of the information is attributed to Barr.)

1. Don’t expect Durham’s findings to be announced before late spring or summer 2020.

2. The FBI did spy on the Trump campaign. That’s what electronic surveillance is.

3. Regarding the FBI’s actions in surveilling Trump campaign associates, it was a “travesty” and there were “many abuses.”

4. From “day one,” the FBI investigation generated exculpatory information (tending to point to the targets’ innocence) and nothing that corroborated Russia collusion.

5. It’s a “big deal” to use U.S. law enforcement and intelligence resources to investigate the opposing political party, and I cannot think of another recent instance in which this happened.

6. Evidence to start the FBI’s investigation into Trump associates was “flimsy” from the start and based on the idea that Trump aide George Papadopoulos expressed he may have had pre-knowledge of a Democrat National Committee computer hack. However, it was actually just an offhand barroom comment by a young campaign aide described merely as a “suggestion of a suggestion, a vague allusion” to the fact that the Russians may have something they can dump. But by that time, May 2016, there was already rampant speculation online and in political circles that the Russians had hacked Hillary Clinton’s emails in 2014 and that they might surface. So the idea that Papadopoulos’s comment showed pre-knowledge of the Democratic National Committee hack and dump “is a big stretch.”

7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.

8. The normal thing to do would be to tell the campaign that there could be attempted foreign interference. There is no legitimate explanation as to why the FBI didn’t do this. The FBI’s explanation for this was that they only do “defensive briefings” if they’re certain there’s no chance they’re tipping someone off. But this simply isn’t true, isn’t plausible, and doesn’t hold water because our intelligence officials and President Barack Obama repeatedly contacted the Russians, the guilty party, to tell them to “cut it out.”

9. If the purpose were to protect the election, you would have given the Trump campaign a defensive briefing. You could have disrupted any foreign activity in time to protect the U.S. election.

10. As to the FBI’s motive, “that’s why we have Durham.” I’m not saying the motivations were improper, but it’s premature to say they weren’t.

11. The inspector general operates differently as an internal watchdog. Horowitz’s approach is to say that if people involved give reasonable explanations for what appears to be wrongdoing, and if he can’t find documentary or testimonial evidence to the contrary, he accepts it.


Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 14th, 2019 at 8:42pm by it_is_the_light »  

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: A.G.Barr and Durham, " THE STORM IS HERE "
Reply #292 - Dec 14th, 2019 at 8:29pm
 
12. Contrary to much reporting, Horowitz didn’t rule out improper motive; he didn’t find documentary or testimonial evidence of improper motive. Those are two different things.

13. Instead of talking to the Trump campaign, the FBI secretly “wired up” sources and had them talk to four people affiliated with the Trump campaign, in August, September, and October 2016.

14. All of the information from this surveillance came back exculpatory regarding any supposed relationship to Russia and specific facts. But the FBI didn’t inform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court, which approved wiretaps against former Trump campaign volunteer Carter Page four times.

15. At one point early on, the FBI didn’t have enough probable cause for a wiretap warrant, so it took the “Steele dossier” information against Trump, “which they’d done nothing to verify,” and used that to get the wiretaps.

16. The wiretaps allowed the FBI to go back and capture Page’s communications, emails, and other material from weeks, months, and even years ago.

17. Should the four FBI applications to wiretap Trump campaign aide Carter Page have ever been made, considering there were 17 critical omissions or errors by the FBI making it appear they had better evidence than they had? This is the meat of the issue, and “if you spend time to look at what happened, you’d be appalled.”

18. The FBI withheld from the court all of the exculpatory information and the lack of reliability of the main FBI source, Christopher Steele, who was being paid by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign to find evidence connecting Trump to Russia.

19. The major takeaway is that after the election in January, the FBI finally talked to one of Steele’s important sources to try to verify some of the “dossier” information and sourcing, as they’re required to do. This Steele source told the FBI he didn’t know what Steele was talking about in the dossier, and that he’d told Steele that the information he’d provided was “supposition” and “theory.” At that point, “it was clear the dossier was a sham.” Yet the FBI didn’t tell the court, and continued to get wiretaps based on the dossier.

20. Further, the FBI falsely told the court that Steele’s source had been proven reliable and truthful. In fact, what the source had told the truth about was that “the dossier was garbage.” It’s hard to look at this “and not think it was gross abuse.”

21. Were the four Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act judges who approved the four wiretaps against Trump associate Carter Page badly misled by the FBI? Yes.

22. Are people going to be held accountable, including at the very top of our intelligence agencies and FBI? Well, they’re all gone.

23. The whole Russia collusion hype was a “bogus narrative hyped by an irresponsible press” that proved entirely false in the end.

Are former FBI Director James Comey and former FBI official Andy McCabe and others implicated in the Durham investigation? I think there was a failure of leadership in that group. Quoting the inspector general, the explanations he received “were not satisfactory. You can draw your own conclusions.”

24. Why haven’t we already thrown people in prison? “These things take time.” The government has to have proof beyond a reasonable doubt before we indict; it’s a substantial hurdle. Nobody is going to be indicted and go to jail unless that standard is met.

In his interviews this week, Barr provided a treasure trove of information about what stands to be one of the most important investigations into our U.S. intelligence community of our time. His signposts indicate that we can expect a shakeup of a system that may have been broken for decades.

watch video *


Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58103
Here
Gender: male
Re: A.G.Barr and Durham, " THE STORM IS HERE "
Reply #293 - Dec 14th, 2019 at 11:51pm
 
it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 14th, 2019 at 8:29pm:
William Barr Has Suddenly Become Chatty—and He’s Provided Quite an Information Dump



Sharyl Attkisson
CONTRIBUTO


Barr was motivated to make the public statements, he said, by the misreporting and confusion surrounding Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report issued on Dec. 9. It found serious government surveillance abuses but no evidence of political bias on the part of the offending FBI officials and agents.

Below are 24 points Barr felt the need to make after the release of the Horowitz report. (All of the information is attributed to Barr.)

1. Don’t expect Durham’s findings to be announced before late spring or summer 2020.
Waste of Time


2. The FBI did spy on the Trump campaign. That’s what electronic surveillance is.
(Wrong) Carter Page was the only one surveilled electronically and he isn't the Trump campaign.


3. Regarding the FBI’s actions in surveilling Trump campaign associates, it was a “travesty” and there were “many abuses.”

4. From “day one,” the FBI investigation generated exculpatory information (tending to point to the targets’ innocence) and nothing that corroborated Russia collusion.
3 of the 4 investigated went to prison ?


5. It’s a “big deal” to use U.S. law enforcement and intelligence resources to investigate the opposing political party, and I cannot think of another recent instance in which this happened.
How stupid is this - The FBI isn't an opposing political party.

6. Evidence to start the FBI’s investigation into Trump associates was “flimsy” from the start
(as  is normal as legislated by a republican administration)
and based on the idea that Trump aide George Papadopoulos expressed he may have had pre-knowledge of a Democrat National Committee computer hack.
No he said Russia wanted to assist the Trump campaign with hacked material ......rest of this section was all BS



7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.
The Trump campaign did participate in a plot with the Trump tower meetings to get dirt on Hillary based on this information.


8. The normal thing to do would be to tell the campaign that there could be attempted foreign interference. There is no legitimate explanation as to why the FBI didn’t do this. The FBI’s explanation for this was that they only do “defensive briefings” if they’re certain there’s no chance they’re tipping someone off.
With at least 4 members of the Trump team involved with the Russians the risk of alerting them to the investigation was real and reasonable.

9. If the purpose were to protect the election, you would have given the Trump campaign a defensive briefing. You could have disrupted any foreign activity in time to protect the U.S. election.
An opinion

10. As to the FBI’s motive, “that’s why we have Durham.” I’m not saying the motivations were improper, but it’s premature to say they weren’t.
You Have Duram because you want a different result and Durham is there to get the result you want. The comprehensive independent IG report is saying that there was no bias. It has more credibility than the Durham report will.

11. The inspector general operates differently as an internal watchdog. Horowitz’s approach is to say that if people involved give reasonable explanations for what appears to be wrongdoing, and if he can’t find documentary or testimonial evidence to the contrary, he accepts it. Yes how unreasonable -
The reason given is reasonable and there is no evidence of wrong doing that is how investigations work stupid ???




Yes there are good reasons that Barr has no credibility.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 15th, 2019 at 12:01am by Dnarever »  
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: A.G.Barr and Durham, " THE STORM IS HERE "
Reply #294 - Dec 15th, 2019 at 8:32am
 


TOM FITTON : House Oversight Testimony on The Clinton Foundation Fraud = #TRPB1YRDLTA
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Online


#FightStupid

Posts: 16879
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: A.G.Barr and Durham, " THE STORM IS HERE "
Reply #295 - Dec 16th, 2019 at 7:38am
 
Dnarever wrote on Dec 14th, 2019 at 11:51pm:
it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 14th, 2019 at 8:29pm:
William Barr Has Suddenly Become Chatty—and He’s Provided Quite an Information Dump



Sharyl Attkisson
CONTRIBUTO


Barr was motivated to make the public statements, he said, by the misreporting and confusion surrounding Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report issued on Dec. 9. It found serious government surveillance abuses but no evidence of political bias on the part of the offending FBI officials and agents.

Below are 24 points Barr felt the need to make after the release of the Horowitz report. (All of the information is attributed to Barr.)

1. Don’t expect Durham’s findings to be announced before late spring or summer 2020.
Waste of Time


2. The FBI did spy on the Trump campaign. That’s what electronic surveillance is.
(Wrong) Carter Page was the only one surveilled electronically and he isn't the Trump campaign.


3. Regarding the FBI’s actions in surveilling Trump campaign associates, it was a “travesty” and there were “many abuses.”

4. From “day one,” the FBI investigation generated exculpatory information (tending to point to the targets’ innocence) and nothing that corroborated Russia collusion.
3 of the 4 investigated went to prison ?


5. It’s a “big deal” to use U.S. law enforcement and intelligence resources to investigate the opposing political party, and I cannot think of another recent instance in which this happened.
How stupid is this - The FBI isn't an opposing political party.

6. Evidence to start the FBI’s investigation into Trump associates was “flimsy” from the start
(as  is normal as legislated by a republican administration)
and based on the idea that Trump aide George Papadopoulos expressed he may have had pre-knowledge of a Democrat National Committee computer hack.
No he said Russia wanted to assist the Trump campaign with hacked material ......rest of this section was all BS



7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.
The Trump campaign did participate in a plot with the Trump tower meetings to get dirt on Hillary based on this information.


8. The normal thing to do would be to tell the campaign that there could be attempted foreign interference. There is no legitimate explanation as to why the FBI didn’t do this. The FBI’s explanation for this was that they only do “defensive briefings” if they’re certain there’s no chance they’re tipping someone off.
With at least 4 members of the Trump team involved with the Russians the risk of alerting them to the investigation was real and reasonable.

9. If the purpose were to protect the election, you would have given the Trump campaign a defensive briefing. You could have disrupted any foreign activity in time to protect the U.S. election.
An opinion

10. As to the FBI’s motive, “that’s why we have Durham.” I’m not saying the motivations were improper, but it’s premature to say they weren’t.
You Have Duram because you want a different result and Durham is there to get the result you want. The comprehensive independent IG report is saying that there was no bias. It has more credibility than the Durham report will.

11. The inspector general operates differently as an internal watchdog. Horowitz’s approach is to say that if people involved give reasonable explanations for what appears to be wrongdoing, and if he can’t find documentary or testimonial evidence to the contrary, he accepts it. Yes how unreasonable -
The reason given is reasonable and there is no evidence of wrong doing that is how investigations work stupid ???




Yes there are good reasons that Barr has no credibility.


Yep.  To be unjustifiably "fair" to him, he has misrepresented the Mueller report and the IG report but wouldn't do the same for the Ukraine call because he's implicated in that mess, all in an effort to distract Trump's base from the truth and since it was exactly what they wanted to hear, they didn't question it and took his summaries over the findings of the report.

This is how easy it is to dupe the tards, and now he's set to do it again...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: A.G.Barr and Durham, " THE STORM IS HERE "
Reply #296 - Dec 20th, 2019 at 9:03pm
 


Attorney General William P. Barr Announces Launch of Operation Relentless Pursuit


...

...
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 40691
Gender: male
Re: A.G.Barr and Durham, " THE STORM IS HERE "
Reply #297 - Dec 20th, 2019 at 9:47pm
 
it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 15th, 2019 at 8:32am:


TOM FITTON : House Oversight Testimony on The Clinton Foundation Fraud = #TRPB1YRDLTA



oooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
According to that, the Saudis gave Bill Clinton between $18 and $50 M for 'speaking', while Hilliary was high up in the govt.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: A.G.Barr and Durham, " THE STORM IS HERE "
Reply #298 - Dec 20th, 2019 at 10:39pm
 
Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 20th, 2019 at 9:47pm:
it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 15th, 2019 at 8:32am:


TOM FITTON : House Oversight Testimony on The Clinton Foundation Fraud = #TRPB1YRDLTA



oooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
According to that, the Saudis gave Bill Clinton between $18 and $50 M for 'speaking', while Hilliary was high up in the govt.


...

...
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: A.G.Barr and Durham, " THE STORM IS HERE "
Reply #299 - Dec 21st, 2019 at 9:02am
 
https://dailycaller.com/2019/12/19/john-durham-john-brennan-emails-steele-dossie...

Report: Durham Is Seeking John Brennan’s Emails And Call Logs


...

U.S Attorney John Durham is seeking the emails, call logs and other communications of former CIA Director John Brennan as part of a broad investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe, according to a report.

The New York Times, citing three sources familiar with the matter, reported that Durham, the U.S. attorney in Connecticut, is looking at the role that Brennan played in assessing that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 election specifically to help Donald Trump.

Durham also wants to know about Brennan’s views of the Steele dossier, the Democrat-funded opposition research that alleged a “well-developed conspiracy of co-operation” between the Trump campaign and Russian government.

Brennan has said that the CIA did not use the dossier, which was written by former British spy Christopher Steele, in its assessment regarding Russian interference in the election. (RELATED: Was John Brennan’s House Intel Testimony Also Based On ‘Bad Information’?)

FBI officials, including then-Director James Comey and then-Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, pushed to include the dossier in an Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on Russian election meddling that was published on Jan. 6, 2017. A summary of the dossier was ultimately put in an appendix to the ICA.

Attorney General William Barr tapped Durham in May to investigate various U.S. agencies’ investigation of the Trump campaign and related intelligence-gathering activities.

...

Barr has said that Durham is looking into whether the agencies scrutinized Trump associates before the FBI officially opened its counterintelligence investigation of the Trump campaign on July 31, 2016.

The Justice Department’s inspector general released a report on Dec. 9 that said that the FBI made “significant inaccuracies” in applications for surveillance warrants against former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

The dossier played a “central and essential” role in the FBI’s decision to seek the warrants, according to the IG. But the report also said that the FBI failed to disclose information that undercut Steele’s credibility and called the veracity of information in the dossier into question.

The IG report provides some insight into discussions between the CIA and FBI regarding whether to use Steele’s information in the ICA, which said that the Russian government meddled in the 2016 election in order to help Trump, rather than merely to sow discord in the U.S. political system.

One FBI official told investigators with the IG’s office that the CIA viewed the dossier as “Internet rumor.” But Brennan has said in interviews since leaving the CIA that Steele’s information was viewed as credible because it tracked with other intelligence that had been collected regarding Russia’s activities.

“There were things in that dossier made me wonder whether or not they were in fact accurate and true,” Brennan said in an interview on Feb. 4, 2018. “I do think it was up to the FBI to see whether or not they could verify any of it. Jim Comey has said it contained salacious and unverified information. Just because it wasn’t unverified doesn’t mean it wasn’t true.”

Brennan also said in the interview that he first heard about information now known to be in the dossier from reporters in late Summer 2016. He said he did not see the Steele information until December 2016.

...

...
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 
Send Topic Print