Australian Politics Forum - mindless hysterics from climate skeptics

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49476
At my desk.

Re: mindless hysterics from climate skeptics
Reply #195 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 8:34am

Gnads wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 8:26am:

cods wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 8:16am:

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2019 at 8:27pm:

I cannot quote you because you - or any of the other hysterics - have never separated the extent of
1. CO2 versus all other factors impacting the climate
2. Human CO2 compared to all other CO2 within the above consideration.

I cannot quote you about a point which all you hysterics studiously avoid addressing:

What percentage of climate change is cause by natural variability, FD? If you could tell us that you would also be able to tell us to what extent human CO2 is responsible for the climate.

But you can't so you put it ALL on human CO2 and call the question itself a delusion. This is lazy, unscientific and dishonest.

I have never seen you or any other climate bed-wetter identify the limit of man-made CO2 versus natural CO2. If you/scientists have made such a separation, remind me/us.

shouldnt you be asking Greta isnt she the current expert on everything CLIMATE?...

Well she is at least an expert on CO2 .... because she is the only person on the planet that can actually "see" it.

She should be able to answer all FD questions about what is natural CO2 & what is man made CO2 .....

you know anything man made is synthetic & never looks like the natural product. Roll Eyes

My only questions have been about just how deluded and hysterical you lot are.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 30110
Gender: male

Re: mindless hysterics from climate skeptics
Reply #196 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 8:39am

freediver wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 8:34am:

Gnads wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 8:26am:

cods wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 8:16am:

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2019 at 8:27pm:

I cannot quote you because you - or any of the other hysterics - have never separated the extent of
1. CO2 versus all other factors impacting the climate
2. Human CO2 compared to all other CO2 within the above consideration.

I cannot quote you about a point which all you hysterics studiously avoid addressing:

What percentage of climate change is cause by natural variability, FD? If you could tell us that you would also be able to tell us to what extent human CO2 is responsible for the climate.

But you can't so you put it ALL on human CO2 and call the question itself a delusion. This is lazy, unscientific and dishonest.

I have never seen you or any other climate bed-wetter identify the limit of man-made CO2 versus natural CO2. If you/scientists have made such a separation, remind me/us.

shouldnt you be asking Greta isnt she the current expert on everything CLIMATE?...

Well she is at least an expert on CO2 .... because she is the only person on the planet that can actually "see" it.

She should be able to answer all FD questions about what is natural CO2 & what is man made CO2 .....

you know anything man made is synthetic & never looks like the natural product. Roll Eyes

My only questions have been about just how deluded and hysterical you lot are.

Spec Savers? So you can have a good look at yourself in the mirror...no?

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: mindless hysterics from climate skeptics
Reply #197 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 9:20am

freediver wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 8:34am:

Gnads wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 8:26am:

cods wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 8:16am:

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2019 at 8:27pm:

I cannot quote you because you - or any of the other hysterics - have never separated the extent of
1. CO2 versus all other factors impacting the climate
2. Human CO2 compared to all other CO2 within the above consideration.

I cannot quote you about a point which all you hysterics studiously avoid addressing:

What percentage of climate change is cause by natural variability, FD? If you could tell us that you would also be able to tell us to what extent human CO2 is responsible for the climate.

But you can't so you put it ALL on human CO2 and call the question itself a delusion. This is lazy, unscientific and dishonest.

I have never seen you or any other climate bed-wetter identify the limit of man-made CO2 versus natural CO2. If you/scientists have made such a separation, remind me/us.

shouldnt you be asking Greta isnt she the current expert on everything CLIMATE?...

Well she is at least an expert on CO2 .... because she is the only person on the planet that can actually "see" it.

She should be able to answer all FD questions about what is natural CO2 & what is man made CO2 .....

you know anything man made is synthetic & never looks like the natural product. Roll Eyes

My only questions have been about just how deluded and hysterical you lot are.

YOU LOT..... is that another terrorist group?...

or do you just believe those who disagree with YOU are just Mindless?....sounds like a brian complex to me..

I am always right... if you dont agree with me I will INSULT YOU..so there!

Back to top

IP Logged

The_Barnacle

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: mindless hysterics from climate skeptics
Reply #198 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 9:35am

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2019 at 8:27pm:

I cannot quote you because you - or any of the other hysterics - have never separated the extent of
1. CO2 versus all other factors impacting the climate
2. Human CO2 compared to all other CO2 within the above consideration.

I cannot quote you about a point which all you hysterics studiously avoid addressing:

What percentage of climate change is cause by natural variability, FD? If you could tell us that you would also be able to tell us to what extent human CO2 is responsible for the climate.

But you can't so you put it ALL on human CO2 and call the question itself a delusion. This is lazy, unscientific and dishonest.

I have never seen you or any other climate bed-wetter identify the limit of man-made CO2 versus natural CO2. If you/scientists have made such a separation, remind me/us.

Frank, like most denialists you seem to have no understanding of the carbon cycle.
natural emissions of CO₂ v natural absorption of CO₂ gives us a planet that is comfortably warm enough to live on.
The human emissions are ADDITIONAL. These accumulate as evidenced by the rising CO₂ levels detacted in our atmosphere.

A lot of you talk about "natural variability" as some sort of explanation, but it isn't. Climate doesn't change for no reason. CO₂ is a well understood greenhouse gas and the levels are rising due to human emissions.

(now I just have to wait for some stupid response from lee)

Back to top

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 30110
Gender: male

Re: mindless hysterics from climate skeptics
Reply #199 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 9:39am

The_Barnacle wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 9:35am:

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2019 at 8:27pm:

I cannot quote you because you - or any of the other hysterics - have never separated the extent of
1. CO2 versus all other factors impacting the climate
2. Human CO2 compared to all other CO2 within the above consideration.

I cannot quote you about a point which all you hysterics studiously avoid addressing:

What percentage of climate change is cause by natural variability, FD? If you could tell us that you would also be able to tell us to what extent human CO2 is responsible for the climate.

But you can't so you put it ALL on human CO2 and call the question itself a delusion. This is lazy, unscientific and dishonest.

I have never seen you or any other climate bed-wetter identify the limit of man-made CO2 versus natural CO2. If you/scientists have made such a separation, remind me/us.

Frank, like most denialists you seem to have no understanding of the carbon cycle.
natural emissions of CO₂ v natural absorption of CO₂ gives us a planet that is comfortably warm enough to live on.
The human emissions are ADDITIONAL. These accumulate as evidenced by the rising CO₂ levels detacted in our atmosphere.

A lot of you talk about "natural variability" as some sort of explanation, but it isn't. Climate doesn't change for no reason. CO₂ is a well understood greenhouse gas and the levels are rising due to human emissions.

(now I just have to wait for some stupid response from lee)

Stupid? You whistle I'll point. Roll Eyes

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49476
At my desk.

Re: mindless hysterics from climate skeptics
Reply #200 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 10:01am

Gnads wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 8:39am:

freediver wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 8:34am:

Gnads wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 8:26am:

cods wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 8:16am:

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2019 at 8:27pm:

I cannot quote you because you - or any of the other hysterics - have never separated the extent of
1. CO2 versus all other factors impacting the climate
2. Human CO2 compared to all other CO2 within the above consideration.

I cannot quote you about a point which all you hysterics studiously avoid addressing:

What percentage of climate change is cause by natural variability, FD? If you could tell us that you would also be able to tell us to what extent human CO2 is responsible for the climate.

But you can't so you put it ALL on human CO2 and call the question itself a delusion. This is lazy, unscientific and dishonest.

I have never seen you or any other climate bed-wetter identify the limit of man-made CO2 versus natural CO2. If you/scientists have made such a separation, remind me/us.

shouldnt you be asking Greta isnt she the current expert on everything CLIMATE?...

Well she is at least an expert on CO2 .... because she is the only person on the planet that can actually "see" it.

She should be able to answer all FD questions about what is natural CO2 & what is man made CO2 .....

you know anything man made is synthetic & never looks like the natural product. Roll Eyes

My only questions have been about just how deluded and hysterical you lot are.

Spec Savers? So you can have a good look at yourself in the mirror...no?

I can quote Frank saying that C02 emissions have no effect on climate at all. I can quote assorted idiotic mindless hysterics from you and just about every other skeptic on here.

Feel free to hold that mirror up to me.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 18051
Gender: male

Re: mindless hysterics from climate skeptics
Reply #201 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 10:52am

The_Barnacle wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 9:35am:

Climate doesn't change for no reason. CO2 is a well understood greenhouse gas and the levels are rising due to human emissions.

Perhaps you can tell us the CO2 emissions for the Minoan, Roman, Mediaeval Warm periods and of course the LIA. Or the reasons behind those warm periods if it wasn't CO2. Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 18051 Gender:	Re: mindless hysterics from climate skeptics Reply #202 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 10:53am freediver wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 10:01am: I can quote assorted idiotic mindless hysterics from you and just about every other skeptic on here. The only thing hysterical is the laughter at you.
Back to top	IP Logged

The_Barnacle

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: mindless hysterics from climate skeptics
Reply #203 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 11:22am

lee wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 10:52am:

The_Barnacle wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 9:35am:

Climate doesn't change for no reason. CO2 is a well understood greenhouse gas and the levels are rising due to human emissions.

Perhaps you can tell us the CO2 emissions for the Minoan, Roman, Mediaeval Warm periods and of course the LIA. Or the reasons behind those warm periods if it wasn't CO2. Wink

Are you saying that climate can change for no reason?

Back to top

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 18051 Gender:	Re: mindless hysterics from climate skeptics Reply #204 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 11:45am The_Barnacle wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 11:22am: Are you saying that climate can change for no reason? No. You? But answer the question - "what caused the previous warm periods"? Why do you never answer that?
Back to top	IP Logged

The_Barnacle

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: mindless hysterics from climate skeptics
Reply #205 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 11:53am

lee wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 11:45am:

The_Barnacle wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 11:22am:

Are you saying that climate can change for no reason?

No. You?

But answer the question - "what caused the previous warm periods"?

Why do you never answer that?

Because I'm not your tutor.
If you want to know, why don't you look it up yourself and let us know.
Google it instead of demanding other people answer your questions

Back to top

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 18051
Gender: male

Re: mindless hysterics from climate skeptics
Reply #206 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 11:58am

The_Barnacle wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 11:53am:

Because I'm not your tutor.
If you want to know, why don't you look it up yourself and let us know.
Google it instead of demanding other people answer your questions

You should just have said "I don't know". Grin

Because no-one "knows". All they can do is speculate. Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

The_Barnacle

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: mindless hysterics from climate skeptics
Reply #207 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 12:07pm

lee wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 11:58am:

The_Barnacle wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 11:53am:

Because I'm not your tutor.
If you want to know, why don't you look it up yourself and let us know.
Google it instead of demanding other people answer your questions

You should just have said "I don't know". Grin

Because no-one "knows". All they can do is speculate. Wink

It happened 1000 years ago. It's even quite likely that it was a European event and not global.

Quote:

The Medieval Warm Period (MWP) also known as the Medieval Climate Optimum, or Medieval Climatic Anomaly was a time of warm climate in the North Atlantic region lasting from c. 950 to c. 1250.[1] It was likely[2] related to warming elsewhere[3][4][5] while some other regions were colder, such as the tropical Pacific. Average global mean temperatures have been calculated to be similar to early-mid-20th-century warming. Possible causes of the Medieval Warm Period include increased solar activity, decreased volcanic activity, and changes to ocean circulation.[6]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_Warm_Period

Now if the current warming isn't being caused by CO₂, please tell us what is causing the warming?

Back to top

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 48261 Gender:	Re: mindless hysterics from climate skeptics Reply #208 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 12:12pm freediver wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 10:01am: I can quote Frank saying that C02 emissions have no effect on climate at all. Go on, then, quote me.
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Valkie

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16142
Central Coast
Gender: male

Re: mindless hysterics from climate skeptics
Reply #209 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 12:23pm

One simple way to annoy the hell out of a climate alarmist.

Guaranteed to get you insulted and screamed at.

Simply because they know that they have no answer and all their theories and pretty graphs mean nothing.

The question?

The earth has been through many heating and cooling cycles since it has been.
Extreme events where the world has been virtually frozen and others where the world has been virtually cooked.

What caused these events?
Easy enough question for the climate alarmists to answer if the have all these pretty graps and computer models.
But they cannot, because they just don't know.

Now, if they cannot tell us why the earth heated and cooled so many times before.
What makes this time any different from all those events in the past.

We are due for an event, it's coming, and no amount of climate alarmism will stop it.
But a great deal of scamming scientists, and those that benifit from the doom and gloom forecast is happening all the time.

Tell me why our planet has heated and cooled in the past.
Then prove this event is not simply one of them
And I will advocate for anything you so desire.

Back to top

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU

IP Logged