Robot wrote on Dec 7
th, 2019 at 3:02pm:
"I don't trust science, but I want you to use science to change my mind."
A bet each way........how convenient....!
OK lets reiterate some of the signature blue prints of Anthropogenic Global Warming,
In 1990 IPCC says climate computer models predict
1. A hot spot in the tropopuase (approximately 15 kilometres above and around the equator.
2. Radio sonde equipment and satellites fail to find this hot spot.
3. Alarmists say the heat went into the oceans.
4. The Argo a system of buoys measuring the ocean s temperature fail to find this missing heat, they would've detected it passing into the deep ocean.
5. Just recently the hockey stick was proven to be false in USA courts and Mann ordered to pay costs, therefore the medieval warm period and little ice did exist.
6. If the climate models were correct in 1990, then by now after 29 years we should be a certain plateau to reaching the 2.7°C warming by the end of this century.
We have failed to reach this plateau therefore the science of Anthropogenic Global Warming is faulty, and if your observations in nature don't match your theory then,
I guess that's why the debate is done and dusted now because if there was ever a debate the alarmist camp would be exposed for what it really is.