Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9
Send Topic Print
If Trump is sacked, Civil War? (Read 4001 times)
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: If Trump is sacked, Civil War?
Reply #45 - Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:02pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 12:56pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 12:49pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 11:34am:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 11:22am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 11:16am:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 11:12am:
It's funny how it's already Trump supporters fault if the US goes off if they asshole Trump.


It's the Trump supporters who are threatening violence.

Did you miss that bit?


And your side hasn't been violent thus far? Actions have consequences. If Trump gets assholed all these rabid cretins who will go back to being little angels. But it won't be forgotten. They haven't realised yet that it would be better to let the democratic process run it's course. These actions are causing more problems . Problems will arise way worse than has been seen so far. You don't farc with the American peoples vote. That's a no no. That's war.


Trump supporters are by far the most violent group in the US at the moment.

And, regarding the democratic process and the peoples vote, most people voted for Clinton in 2016.

Trump was runner up to Hillary - she received 3,000,000 more votes.

The American people clearly demonstrated that they wanted Clinton as their President, not the alleged child rapist.

Tell me, Jocko: is democracy working when the person with the most votes doesn't win?

Who was it who said "You don't farc with the American peoples vote"?

I'm curious.


Didn't seem to matter when Bill got in without the popular vote. It does now for some silly reason.


These people lost the popular vote, yet became President:

     1824: John Quincy Adams
     1876: Rutherford B. Hayes
     1888: Benjamin Harrison
     2000: George W. Bush
     2016: Donald Trump

Not sure what "Bill" you're talking about.

Anyway, do you think democracy is working well when the person with the most votes loses the election?

Who was it who said "You don't farc with the American peoples vote"?

Bill Clinton won the most popular votes in each of his elections, but he didn't win an outright majority in either. In 1992 he got 43% of the vote. In 1996 he got 49% of the vote
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 136378
Gender: male
Re: If Trump is sacked, Civil War?
Reply #46 - Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:20pm
 
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:02pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 12:56pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 12:49pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 11:34am:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 11:22am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 11:16am:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 11:12am:
It's funny how it's already Trump supporters fault if the US goes off if they asshole Trump.


It's the Trump supporters who are threatening violence.

Did you miss that bit?


And your side hasn't been violent thus far? Actions have consequences. If Trump gets assholed all these rabid cretins who will go back to being little angels. But it won't be forgotten. They haven't realised yet that it would be better to let the democratic process run it's course. These actions are causing more problems . Problems will arise way worse than has been seen so far. You don't farc with the American peoples vote. That's a no no. That's war.


Trump supporters are by far the most violent group in the US at the moment.

And, regarding the democratic process and the peoples vote, most people voted for Clinton in 2016.

Trump was runner up to Hillary - she received 3,000,000 more votes.

The American people clearly demonstrated that they wanted Clinton as their President, not the alleged child rapist.

Tell me, Jocko: is democracy working when the person with the most votes doesn't win?

Who was it who said "You don't farc with the American peoples vote"?

I'm curious.


Didn't seem to matter when Bill got in without the popular vote. It does now for some silly reason.


These people lost the popular vote, yet became President:

     1824: John Quincy Adams
     1876: Rutherford B. Hayes
     1888: Benjamin Harrison
     2000: George W. Bush
     2016: Donald Trump

Not sure what "Bill" you're talking about.

Anyway, do you think democracy is working well when the person with the most votes loses the election?

Who was it who said "You don't farc with the American peoples vote"?

Bill Clinton won the most popular votes in each of his elections, but he didn't win an outright majority in either. In 1992 he got 43% of the vote. In 1996 he got 49% of the vote


Ah.

So you've changed the subject now.

Why?  Nobody mentioned outright majority.

And, why won't you answer my questions:

- Do you think democracy is working well when the person with the most votes loses the election?

- Who was it who said "You don't farc with the American peoples vote"?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: If Trump is sacked, Civil War?
Reply #47 - Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:27pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:20pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:02pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 12:56pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 12:49pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 11:34am:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 11:22am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 11:16am:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 11:12am:
It's funny how it's already Trump supporters fault if the US goes off if they asshole Trump.


It's the Trump supporters who are threatening violence.

Did you miss that bit?


And your side hasn't been violent thus far? Actions have consequences. If Trump gets assholed all these rabid cretins who will go back to being little angels. But it won't be forgotten. They haven't realised yet that it would be better to let the democratic process run it's course. These actions are causing more problems . Problems will arise way worse than has been seen so far. You don't farc with the American peoples vote. That's a no no. That's war.


Trump supporters are by far the most violent group in the US at the moment.

And, regarding the democratic process and the peoples vote, most people voted for Clinton in 2016.

Trump was runner up to Hillary - she received 3,000,000 more votes.

The American people clearly demonstrated that they wanted Clinton as their President, not the alleged child rapist.

Tell me, Jocko: is democracy working when the person with the most votes doesn't win?

Who was it who said "You don't farc with the American peoples vote"?

I'm curious.


Didn't seem to matter when Bill got in without the popular vote. It does now for some silly reason.


These people lost the popular vote, yet became President:

     1824: John Quincy Adams
     1876: Rutherford B. Hayes
     1888: Benjamin Harrison
     2000: George W. Bush
     2016: Donald Trump

Not sure what "Bill" you're talking about.

Anyway, do you think democracy is working well when the person with the most votes loses the election?

Who was it who said "You don't farc with the American peoples vote"?

Bill Clinton won the most popular votes in each of his elections, but he didn't win an outright majority in either. In 1992 he got 43% of the vote. In 1996 he got 49% of the vote


Ah.

So you've changed the subject now.

Why?  Nobody mentioned outright majority.

And, why won't you answer my questions:

- Do you think democracy is working well when the person with the most votes loses the election?

- Who was it who said "You don't farc with the American peoples vote"?

One part of me says no but another says yes. The US is a huge country with vastly different states and counties. At least this system takes this into account. Let me remind you of something. Pauline Hanson has been dudded because of this system. But you liked it then hey? a  reminder - Trump scored 46.1% in his win. That beats Bill's 43%. I doubt Hillary ever whinged about that.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26499
Australia
Re: If Trump is sacked, Civil War?
Reply #48 - Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:34pm
 
It wouldn't be a civil war. It would be the military slaughtering the rebels

Spot
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: If Trump is sacked, Civil War?
Reply #49 - Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:41pm
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:34pm:
It wouldn't be a civil war. It would be the military slaughtering the rebels

Spot

who's the rebels?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26499
Australia
Re: If Trump is sacked, Civil War?
Reply #50 - Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:50pm
 
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:41pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:34pm:
It wouldn't be a civil war. It would be the military slaughtering the rebels

Spot

who's the rebels?


Obviously the trump supporters that get violent because hes ousted

You cant get that from reading the thread?

Spot
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: If Trump is sacked, Civil War?
Reply #51 - Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:52pm
 
1998 federal election- Hanson won 36 percent of the primary vote,[26] slightly over 10% more than the second-place Labor candidate, Virginia Clarke. However, preferences were enough to elect the Liberal candidate, Cameron Thompson, who had been third in the primary vote. 

Going by you constant arguments about primary vote you must have been outraged Pecca??
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: If Trump is sacked, Civil War?
Reply #52 - Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:54pm
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:50pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:41pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:34pm:
It wouldn't be a civil war. It would be the military slaughtering the rebels

Spot

who's the rebels?


Obviously the trump supporters that get violent because hes ousted

You cant get that from reading the thread?

Spot

Most of the military won't fire on patriotic Americans. They'd sooner fire on the flag burning commies who infest the radical left.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26499
Australia
Re: If Trump is sacked, Civil War?
Reply #53 - Dec 17th, 2019 at 2:09pm
 
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:54pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:50pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:41pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:34pm:
It wouldn't be a civil war. It would be the military slaughtering the rebels

Spot

who's the rebels?


Obviously the trump supporters that get violent because hes ousted

You cant get that from reading the thread?

Spot

Most of the military won't fire on patriotic Americans. They'd sooner fire on the flag burning commies who infest the radical left.


They will if they are ordered to and the so called patriots are killing people

Spot
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: If Trump is sacked, Civil War?
Reply #54 - Dec 17th, 2019 at 2:18pm
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 2:09pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:54pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:50pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:41pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:34pm:
It wouldn't be a civil war. It would be the military slaughtering the rebels

Spot

who's the rebels?


Obviously the trump supporters that get violent because hes ousted

You cant get that from reading the thread?

Spot

Most of the military won't fire on patriotic Americans. They'd sooner fire on the flag burning commies who infest the radical left.


They will if they are ordered to and the so called patriots are killing people

Spot

Look at the LA riots. They didn't fire then , did they?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 136378
Gender: male
Re: If Trump is sacked, Civil War?
Reply #55 - Dec 17th, 2019 at 2:22pm
 
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:27pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:20pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:02pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 12:56pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 12:49pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 11:34am:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 11:22am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 11:16am:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 11:12am:
It's funny how it's already Trump supporters fault if the US goes off if they asshole Trump.


It's the Trump supporters who are threatening violence.

Did you miss that bit?


And your side hasn't been violent thus far? Actions have consequences. If Trump gets assholed all these rabid cretins who will go back to being little angels. But it won't be forgotten. They haven't realised yet that it would be better to let the democratic process run it's course. These actions are causing more problems . Problems will arise way worse than has been seen so far. You don't farc with the American peoples vote. That's a no no. That's war.


Trump supporters are by far the most violent group in the US at the moment.

And, regarding the democratic process and the peoples vote, most people voted for Clinton in 2016.

Trump was runner up to Hillary - she received 3,000,000 more votes.

The American people clearly demonstrated that they wanted Clinton as their President, not the alleged child rapist.

Tell me, Jocko: is democracy working when the person with the most votes doesn't win?

Who was it who said "You don't farc with the American peoples vote"?

I'm curious.


Didn't seem to matter when Bill got in without the popular vote. It does now for some silly reason.


These people lost the popular vote, yet became President:

     1824: John Quincy Adams
     1876: Rutherford B. Hayes
     1888: Benjamin Harrison
     2000: George W. Bush
     2016: Donald Trump

Not sure what "Bill" you're talking about.

Anyway, do you think democracy is working well when the person with the most votes loses the election?

Who was it who said "You don't farc with the American peoples vote"?

Bill Clinton won the most popular votes in each of his elections, but he didn't win an outright majority in either. In 1992 he got 43% of the vote. In 1996 he got 49% of the vote


Ah.

So you've changed the subject now.

Why?  Nobody mentioned outright majority.

And, why won't you answer my questions:

- Do you think democracy is working well when the person with the most votes loses the election?

- Who was it who said "You don't farc with the American peoples vote"?

One part of me says no but another says yes. The US is a huge country with vastly different states and counties. At least this system takes this into account. Let me remind you of something. Pauline Hanson has been dudded because of this system. But you liked it then hey? a  reminder - Trump scored 46.1% in his win. That beats Bill's 43%. I doubt Hillary ever whinged about that.


You said "You don't farc with the American peoples vote".

The American voters chose Clinton in 2016.

It wasn't even close - she received 3,000,000 more votes than Trump.

America clearly did not get the President they wanted.

The electoral College, as you say, "farcked with the American peoples vote".

But all of a sudden, that doesn't matter to you any more.

Your double standards and hypocrisy are worse than cods', and that's saying something.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26499
Australia
Re: If Trump is sacked, Civil War?
Reply #56 - Dec 17th, 2019 at 2:23pm
 
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 2:18pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 2:09pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:54pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:50pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:41pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:34pm:
It wouldn't be a civil war. It would be the military slaughtering the rebels

Spot

who's the rebels?


Obviously the trump supporters that get violent because hes ousted

You cant get that from reading the thread?

Spot

Most of the military won't fire on patriotic Americans. They'd sooner fire on the flag burning commies who infest the radical left.


They will if they are ordered to and the so called patriots are killing people

Spot

Look at the LA riots. They didn't fire then , did they?


We're they ordered to?

Spot
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26499
Australia
Re: If Trump is sacked, Civil War?
Reply #57 - Dec 17th, 2019 at 2:23pm
 
Spot
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26499
Australia
Re: If Trump is sacked, Civil War?
Reply #58 - Dec 17th, 2019 at 2:24pm
 
Oops wrong thread

Spot
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: If Trump is sacked, Civil War?
Reply #59 - Dec 17th, 2019 at 2:26pm
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 2:23pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 2:18pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 2:09pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:54pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:50pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:41pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 17th, 2019 at 1:34pm:
It wouldn't be a civil war. It would be the military slaughtering the rebels

Spot

who's the rebels?


Obviously the trump supporters that get violent because hes ousted

You cant get that from reading the thread?

Spot

Most of the military won't fire on patriotic Americans. They'd sooner fire on the flag burning commies who infest the radical left.


They will if they are ordered to and the so called patriots are killing people

Spot

Look at the LA riots. They didn't fire then , did they?


We're they ordered to?

Spot

Nope.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9
Send Topic Print