Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2019 at 10:12am:


Like this one?

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?action=viewprofile;username=blue_angel

?

Time for a history lesson.

Since this thread has devolved into Light throwing out more claims that other posters here are paedophiles or at least support them and child sexual abuse it's time to put an end to this one and for all.

Light continually attempts to play the victim, claiming to be an innocent poster and once confronted with the reality that if he was so innocent he wouldn't continually troll people to the point of throwing out false accusation surrounding the sexual abuse of children, he demanded proof of this, he was given it, created this thread and started with the accusation all over again.

No

This whole mess started because of one of his looney threads where another poster replied to his ideas of "facts" surrounding alien contact with a gif from South Park.

That gif and the topic has been done to death. I know he'll post more question in reply to this and demand answers, but everything I have to say on the topic is below.

All he does now is use this faux concern to attack people on the forums and complain about a moderation decision he doesn't like, instead of actually doing something to report the content if he feels so strongly that it is child pornography.

In case he or anyone needs a refresher, here are the people he needs to contact (from 2018!) if he actually cares and isn't as usual simply exploiting the issue of child abuse for his own personal gratification as you can see with yet another accusation below:

(the 9th if you're keeping count, with the 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th here)

KangAnon wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2018 at 8:49am:


Or are you still claiming the freemasons will get you if you actually take action?

it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2018 at 12:15pm:


FD made it clear,

freediver wrote on Apr 23^rd, 2018 at 12:36pm:


I've worked for an ISP before where we have to block the ACMA blacklist and report to them content that should be on it.  It was very secretive even before Labor's silly internet filtering idea.  I've also been involved in having to report customers to the AFP for their actions online around child pornography in this role.

I've done my part.  I've not found anything to report since being a civilian again because I don't seek out that content, but I would report it in an instant to the authorities if ever there was a need.

Unlike Light, I don't make up a conspiracy about not reporting content because of "freemasons" so I can continue to exploit the topic of the sexual abuse of children for my own personal gratification, which is exactly what he is doing, this thread is a prime example.

Just another excuse to accuse more posters of being paedophiles, supporting paedophiles or accepting the sexual abuse of children.

Un-smacking-acceptable Light.

Light, why don't you report the content if you feel so strongly that it's child sexual abuse? 

Do you not think it's actually worth reporting? Are you really simply using it as a tool to attack others in the vilest of ways?

KangAnon wrote on Dec 30^th, 2019 at 8:57am:


you said you " would take steps " if you were moderator

you did not say you would bann this rubbish

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2019 at 8:53pm:


so go ahead and clarify what you would do sad one ..

1. will you bann this imagery ?

2. if not why not ?

i didnt know you were a Freemason sad?

the proof will be in the eating of the pudding, won't it?

Greg has denied absolutely that he has more than one ISP and challenged Freedriver to prove him wrong.  Confident.  But as people have said, multiple IDs is a different matter as we know

my opinion only, but due to the rancour and suspicions raised by this mod election, it might be best for it to be revealed who voted for whom.  I've revealed my vote as have others, but the argy bargy demands voter transparency to avoid ongoing feuding

further, I believe censorship is necessary in most instances, although Kangaroo has stated he holds an opposite opinion

removal of censorship gave us what we have now in this country, and it didn't happen by accident.  If memory serves correctly, removal of censorship occurred in the 1980s and the justification was, 'people should be able to make their own decisions about what to watch, read, etc.'

well no.  People are half wits/animals, many of them.  And it's the half witted animals who comprise what has become an epidemic of porn addicts -- bankers/masturbators, who are so bereft of personal pride and decency that they find nothing shameful about watching paid actors simulate sex for the watchers' masturbatory pleasure -- also child porn, which I would challenge anyone to deny has led to the constant attacks on children, kidnapping of children and trafficking of children for sex as if they were commodities

There is little actual difference between child porn being allowed in this forum and a animated cartoon version of the same thing, imo and the opinion of others.  Yet Kangaroo defended the animation on the grounds there would be no censorship were he to be made Mod of Fringe

birds of a feather and who could vote for someone who openly flies with the likes of greg and smith.  Not me, that's for sure