PZ547 wrote on Dec 30
th, 2019 at 3:25pm:
the proof will be in the eating of the pudding, won't it?
Greg has denied absolutely that he has more than one ISP and challenged Freedriver to prove him wrong. Confident. But as people have said, multiple IDs is a different matter as we know
my opinion only, but due to the rancour and suspicions raised by this mod election, it might be best for it to be revealed who voted for whom. I've revealed my vote as have others, but the argy bargy demands voter transparency to avoid ongoing feuding
further, I believe censorship is necessary in most instances, although Kangaroo has stated he holds an opposite opinion
removal of censorship gave us what we have now in this country, and it didn't happen by accident. If memory serves correctly, removal of censorship occurred in the 1980s and the justification was, 'people should be able to make their own decisions about what to watch, read, etc.'
well no. People are half wits/animals, many of them. And it's the half witted animals who comprise what has become an epidemic of porn addicts -- bankers/masturbators, who are so bereft of personal pride and decency that they find nothing shameful about watching paid actors simulate sex for the watchers' masturbatory pleasure -- also child porn, which I would challenge anyone to deny has led to the constant attacks on children, kidnapping of children and trafficking of children for sex as if they were commodities
There is little actual difference between child porn being allowed in this forum and a animated cartoon version of the same thing, imo and the opinion of others. Yet Kangaroo defended the animation on the grounds there would be no censorship were he to be made Mod of Fringe
birds of a feather and who could vote for someone who openly flies with the likes of greg and smith. Not me, that's for sure
Being against censorship of legal content as a principle does not mean a lack of moderation.
The images are being posted as a form of trolling. They would be removed as excessive trolling or off-topic.
But the reality is, they're not child porn. I know for personal reasons many want it to be considered that so they're justified in accusing others of being paedophiles, but to borrow a phrase, the facts don't care about their feelings.
I'd be happy to host a poll to see if people would like that content to be removed and banned from the Fringe, but are we going to have to start holding polls around other objectionable content too?
Maybe all the satanic stuff posted should be removed, pro or against?
Or pseudoscience since people die by shunning accepted medical advice for a miracle cure they read about online? Imagine dying of a curable disease because some crackpot tried to sell you a copper pyramid with the promises of it curing your illness?
the Fringe Forum is delegated for the study of Satanic Cult Activity ..
are you saying you want to suppress the topic so you can hide the Satanic agenda ?