Australian Politics Forum - Potential Freemasonic Takeover of Fringe

Black Orchid

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 5813
Gender: female

Re: Potential Freemasonic Takeover of Fringe
Reply #30 - Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:20pm

Setanta wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 8:26pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 8:17pm:

Setanta wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 7:52pm:

For me, my vote came down to the censorship argument and how each of them dealt with it. I guess from my views on censorship my vote has been exposed.

IITL is fringe but it's not just about that. How can someone that is fringe complain that the fringe shyte is censored, be a censor? Surely they would want more open discussion.

He would only have stopped posts of a depraved sexual nature.

Only depraved people see depraved sexual acts in comedy. Comedy is mean to challenge one, not to be taken literally. Someone that appears to believe the information he is in possession of is being censored by "x" is not one that should promote censorship. We have govt bodies for that purpose and all their posturing won't change that. It could well show what kind of mod they would be.

I agree that comedy should be viewed as such but didn't they both want to ban such posts/images?

The problem here is that too many of the MRBs are too strictly 'moderated' based on their own personal bias and spite towards other posters. I don't like you so you are banned wah wah wah.

I personally thought Light deserved the post of Mod because he contributes so much to Fringe topics. If he chooses to not do that anymore Fringe, and the forum as a whole, will obviously suffer. *shrug

Looks to me like it became a battle of wills with someone working behind the scenes.

Back to top

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16644
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: Potential Freemasonic Takeover of Fringe
Reply #31 - Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:25pm

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:20pm:

Setanta wrote Today at 9:26pm:
Bobby. wrote Today at 9:17pm:
Setanta wrote Today at 8:52pm:
For me, my vote came down to the censorship argument and how each of them dealt with it. I guess from my views on censorship my vote has been exposed.

IITL is fringe but it's not just about that. How can someone that is fringe complain that the fringe shyte is censored, be a censor? Surely they would want more open discussion.

He would only have stopped posts of a depraved sexual nature.

Only depraved people see depraved sexual acts in comedy. Comedy is mean to challenge one, not to be taken literally. Someone that appears to believe the information he is in possession of is being censored by "x" is not one that should promote censorship. We have govt bodies for that purpose and all their posturing won't change that. It could well show what kind of mod they would be.

I agree that comedy should be viewed as such but didn't they both want to ban such posts/images?

The problem here is that too many of the MRBs are too strictly 'moderated' based on their own personal bias and spite towards other posters. I don't like you so you are banned wah wah wah.

I personally thought Light deserved the post of Mod because he contributes so much to Fringe topics. If he chooses to not do that anymore Fringe, and the forum as a whole, will obviously suffer. *shrug

Looks to me like it became a battle of wills with someone working behind the scenes.

I was since this came up going as an issue, Fringe mod, going to vote for light but when the censorship/cartoon stuff happened, I couldn't in good conscience vote for it. I'm not a fan of censorship and I didn't like IITL's excuse or his bullying the other candidate to come around to his way of thinking or be branded.

Much like I think Monk may have more climate knowledge and a far better argument than Bobby, his other, let's call them attributes let him down. Much the same in this case.

I hope IITL keeps posting and Kangy can let him without too much friction. It's title is "Fringe" after all.

Back to top

IP Logged

random

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2637
Gender: male

Re: Potential Freemasonic Takeover of Fringe
Reply #32 - Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:29pm

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:20pm:

Setanta wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 8:26pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 8:17pm:

Setanta wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 7:52pm:

For me, my vote came down to the censorship argument and how each of them dealt with it. I guess from my views on censorship my vote has been exposed.

IITL is fringe but it's not just about that. How can someone that is fringe complain that the fringe shyte is censored, be a censor? Surely they would want more open discussion.

He would only have stopped posts of a depraved sexual nature.

Only depraved people see depraved sexual acts in comedy. Comedy is mean to challenge one, not to be taken literally. Someone that appears to believe the information he is in possession of is being censored by "x" is not one that should promote censorship. We have govt bodies for that purpose and all their posturing won't change that. It could well show what kind of mod they would be.

I agree that comedy should be viewed as such but didn't they both want to ban such posts/images?

The problem here is that too many of the MRBs are too strictly 'moderated' based on their own personal bias and spite towards other posters. I don't like you so you are banned wah wah wah.

I personally thought Light deserved the post of Mod because he contributes so much to Fringe topics. If he chooses to not do that anymore Fringe, and the forum as a whole, will obviously suffer. *shrug

Looks to me like it became a battle of wills with someone working behind the scenes.

YHTBFKM

Light is a loose cannon. Not mod material in so many ways.

But some people don't care about the greater good, just as long as the guy who agrees with them gets the gig.

Back to top

So many farkwits, so little time.

IP Logged

Black Orchid

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 5813
Gender: female

Re: Potential Freemasonic Takeover of Fringe
Reply #33 - Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:31pm

I didn't read the fighting. It's old and tired and rampant here which is why I rarely bother.

You really don't think SK will not over moderate Lights opinions/videos and such?

The little I did read indicated that he would and considering Light is the major contributor to Fringe it will suffer if that happens.

Back to top

IP Logged

Black Orchid

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 5813
Gender: female

Re: Potential Freemasonic Takeover of Fringe
Reply #34 - Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:33pm

random wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:29pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:20pm:

Setanta wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 8:26pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 8:17pm:

Setanta wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 7:52pm:

For me, my vote came down to the censorship argument and how each of them dealt with it. I guess from my views on censorship my vote has been exposed.

IITL is fringe but it's not just about that. How can someone that is fringe complain that the fringe shyte is censored, be a censor? Surely they would want more open discussion.

He would only have stopped posts of a depraved sexual nature.

Only depraved people see depraved sexual acts in comedy. Comedy is mean to challenge one, not to be taken literally. Someone that appears to believe the information he is in possession of is being censored by "x" is not one that should promote censorship. We have govt bodies for that purpose and all their posturing won't change that. It could well show what kind of mod they would be.

I agree that comedy should be viewed as such but didn't they both want to ban such posts/images?

The problem here is that too many of the MRBs are too strictly 'moderated' based on their own personal bias and spite towards other posters. I don't like you so you are banned wah wah wah.

I personally thought Light deserved the post of Mod because he contributes so much to Fringe topics. If he chooses to not do that anymore Fringe, and the forum as a whole, will obviously suffer. *shrug

Looks to me like it became a battle of wills with someone working behind the scenes.

YHTBFKM

Light is a loose cannon. Not mod material in so many ways.

But some people don't care about the greater good, just as long as the guy who agrees with them gets the gig.

Well to be perfectly honest, the little I have read of yourself you seem like a loose canon yourself.. Just saying.

Back to top

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16644
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: Potential Freemasonic Takeover of Fringe
Reply #35 - Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:34pm

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:31pm:

I didn't read the fighting. It's old and tired and rampant here which is why I rarely bother.

You really don't think SK will not over moderate Lights opinions/videos and such?

The little I did read indicated that he would and considering Light is the major contributor to Fringe it will suffer if that happens.

I hope not but I can't control that and it's not for me to control.

On the other hand, do you think IITL wouldn't do the same and only have his version visible? I have engaged IITL many times.

Back to top

IP Logged

random

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2637
Gender: male

Re: Potential Freemasonic Takeover of Fringe
Reply #36 - Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:35pm

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:31pm:

I didn't read the fighting. It's old and tired and rampant here which is why I rarely bother.

You really don't think SK will not over moderate Lights opinions/videos and such?

The little I did read indicated that he would and considering Light is the major contributor to Fringe it will suffer if that happens.

I don't care, I don't go to fringe although I might have a look now.

But Light needs moderating, he's a fukking fruitcake.

Back to top

So many farkwits, so little time.

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16644
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: Potential Freemasonic Takeover of Fringe
Reply #37 - Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:38pm

random wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:35pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:31pm:

I didn't read the fighting. It's old and tired and rampant here which is why I rarely bother.

You really don't think SK will not over moderate Lights opinions/videos and such?

The little I did read indicated that he would and considering Light is the major contributor to Fringe it will suffer if that happens.

I don't care, I don't go to fringe although I might have a look now.

But Light needs moderating, he's a fukking fruitcake.

Perhaps there is more than one nut in the fruitcake?

Back to top

IP Logged

Black Orchid

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 5813
Gender: female

Re: Potential Freemasonic Takeover of Fringe
Reply #38 - Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:39pm

Setanta wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:34pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:31pm:

I didn't read the fighting. It's old and tired and rampant here which is why I rarely bother.

You really don't think SK will not over moderate Lights opinions/videos and such?

The little I did read indicated that he would and considering Light is the major contributor to Fringe it will suffer if that happens.

I hope not but I can't control that and it's not for me to control.

On the other hand, do you think IITL wouldn't do the same and only have his version visible? I have engaged IITL many times.

I really don't know. Like I said, I think they would both act against each other on a personal scale and there is too much of that here already. So I doubt one would be any better in that regard than the other. *shrug

My opinion was based on contributions to the Fringe forum and Light, by far, exceeds anyone else. One only has to look at the threads started. Light IS fringe!

Back to top

IP Logged

Black Orchid

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 5813
Gender: female

Re: Potential Freemasonic Takeover of Fringe
Reply #39 - Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:40pm

random wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:35pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:31pm:

I didn't read the fighting. It's old and tired and rampant here which is why I rarely bother.

You really don't think SK will not over moderate Lights opinions/videos and such?

The little I did read indicated that he would and considering Light is the major contributor to Fringe it will suffer if that happens.

I don't care, I don't go to fringe although I might have a look now.

But Light needs moderating, he's a fukking fruitcake.

There are many fruitcakes here and some of them are mods too.

Back to top

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16644
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: Potential Freemasonic Takeover of Fringe
Reply #40 - Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:43pm

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:40pm:

random wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:35pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:31pm:

I didn't read the fighting. It's old and tired and rampant here which is why I rarely bother.

You really don't think SK will not over moderate Lights opinions/videos and such?

The little I did read indicated that he would and considering Light is the major contributor to Fringe it will suffer if that happens.

I don't care, I don't go to fringe although I might have a look now.

But Light needs moderating, he's a fukking fruitcake.

There are many fruitcakes here and some of them are mods too.

Ooops.

Back to top

IP Logged

Black Orchid Gold Member Offline Posts: 5813 Gender:	Re: Potential Freemasonic Takeover of Fringe Reply #41 - Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:48pm Setanta wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:43pm: Ooops. I didn't mean you but if you think the cap fits by all means try it on.
Back to top	IP Logged

random

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2637
Gender: male

Re: Potential Freemasonic Takeover of Fringe
Reply #42 - Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:51pm

Setanta wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:38pm:

random wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:35pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:31pm:

I didn't read the fighting. It's old and tired and rampant here which is why I rarely bother.

You really don't think SK will not over moderate Lights opinions/videos and such?

The little I did read indicated that he would and considering Light is the major contributor to Fringe it will suffer if that happens.

I don't care, I don't go to fringe although I might have a look now.

But Light needs moderating, he's a fukking fruitcake.

Perhaps there is more than one nut in the fruitcake?

So you are a nut too?

Back to top

So many farkwits, so little time.

IP Logged

AiA Gold Member Offline Posts: 18405 Gender:	Re: Potential Freemasonic Takeover of Fringe Reply #43 - Dec 31^st, 2019 at 11:19pm Accusations of paedophilia would have had a home here in Fringe had Light won the election.
Back to top	“Jerry, just remember: It’s not a lie … if you believe it.” George Costanza IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16644
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: Potential Freemasonic Takeover of Fringe
Reply #44 - Dec 31^st, 2019 at 11:26pm

random wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:51pm:

Setanta wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:38pm:

random wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:35pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 31^st, 2019 at 10:31pm:

I didn't read the fighting. It's old and tired and rampant here which is why I rarely bother.

You really don't think SK will not over moderate Lights opinions/videos and such?

The little I did read indicated that he would and considering Light is the major contributor to Fringe it will suffer if that happens.

I don't care, I don't go to fringe although I might have a look now.

But Light needs moderating, he's a fukking fruitcake.

Perhaps there is more than one nut in the fruitcake?

So you are a nut too?

Perhaps I'm fruit... Today.

Back to top

IP Logged

Poll
Question: Did Monk change the outcome?
* This poll has now closed *
Yes 8 (66.7%) No 4 (33.3%) Total votes: 12 « Created by: Bobby. on: Jan 1^st, 2020 at 8:07am »