tickleandrose wrote on Jan 2
nd, 2020 at 11:03am:
- The greens party never actually have any policy against back burning. In fact, it is a recognized method of fire prevention.
- The greens are never in the position of power in local rural government / councils. In fact, most of those fire affected areas are either national, coalition, or independents with strong conservative links.
- They are the ones setting up residential zoning permits, permits for back burning - when where and how much to spend.
- They had been caught snoozing behind their self entitled / well paid job, and now looking for 'inner city' greenies to blame for their short coming. Laughable at best.
- But realistically, if you look at the current fire maps, we have burnt through more than 1 million hectares in NSW, and so far, 550 000 hectares in Vic, just look at the area east of Lakes Entrance. So we are talking vast, vast areas, of mixed bushlands, forest, and grass lands. Are we seriously going to back burn all these areas yearly? What kind of man power is required to do such a feat?
Back burning is a strategy used in controlling fires that have already started & have to be contained or put out ......
Controlled slow burningis what is used to manage undergrowth fuel build up.
Greens don't want burning off either way .... policy or not.
Besides the idiots can't make up their minds on most issues.