Bobby. wrote on Feb 1
st, 2020 at 4:39pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Feb 1
st, 2020 at 4:34pm:
Not even close.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EPo3PoeX4AEHpQO.jpgBut you've already chosen to believe that this is a man made weapon and I suppose nothing will change your mind, but I could suggest you take your "bat-poo" conspiracy to the Fringe where it belongs.
Why should the scientists at the:
Kusuma School of biological sciences, Indian institute of technology, New Delhi-110016, India. 2Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, New Delhi-110019, India
lie to us?
The Paper has undergone no peer review, it's not even been published. Biorxiv.org is a "preprint repository", which means nothing posted there has undergone peer review.
As stated in the post I highlighted, the authors (Prashant Pradhan, Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, Akhilesh Mishra, Parul Gupta, Praveen Kumar Tripathi, Manoj Balakrishnan Menon, James Gomes, Perumal Vivekanandan & Bishwajit Kundu) took the sequencing data from the amino acids of the Virus and searched through the NCBIs BLASTp database and found the scariest partial match they could find, which happened to be an HIV variant.
There are other viruses that have better matches than this variant of HIV but they're not "sexy".
You'll see this be thoroughly debunked the moment it's peer-reviewed if they ever submit it for peer review. They don't even have any proof it's been manufactured. They've taken an incorrect link between the two viruses and concluded that it's man-made.
There is no evidence to support that conclusion or that it even matched HIV.
But again, you've made your mind up so once the rigours of the scientific process debunk this, you'll treat it like Andrew Wakefield discredited paper on vaccinations and lean into the conspiracy that it's a cover-up or big pharma lying etc...