Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll closed Poll
Question: Should Bobby receive an Ozpolitic journalist award for excellence?
*** This poll has now closed ***


Yes    
  3 (75.0%)
No    
  1 (25.0%)




Total votes: 4
« Created by: Bobby. on: Dec 28th, 2024 at 11:29am »

Pages: 1 ... 93 94 95 96 97 ... 112
Send Topic Print
China's covert biological weapons program (Read 131587 times)
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 105089
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: China's covert biological weapons program
Reply #1410 - Sep 2nd, 2024 at 9:28pm
 
But there's more:


https://x.com/Ultrafrog17/status/1830008709474300225


Robert Kennedy Junior says that Fauci and Gates were involved in terrible, immoral, homicidal criminal behavior during Covid and that by depriving people of Ivermectin millions of people died. He says there needs to be a reckoning after they pretended like there was no cure for Covid so they could push the vaccine for profit.
This is the man who is now allied closely with Trump and may be able to take on big pharma like no one has.
Things are looking up. 🔥

"I don't look into Anthony Fauci's head. I don't look into Bill Gates's head. I don't say he did this because he was greedy or because he was manipulative I just lay out what they did and the story speaks for itself. And you know it's a story of really of people involved in really terrible terrible, immoral, homicidal, criminal behavior. A position of government that he had for fifty years without any election, to clamp down these totalitarian controls that were not science based and that everybody now admits There was no science In fact yesterday…
the chief…
attorney for FDA admitted that there was no reason to discourage people from taking Ivermectin. Ivermectin was a was a very very devastating cure for COVID it literally obliterated COVID. And you know by depriving people of Ivermectin many people millions of people around the globe died. And they didn't need to. There were cures for COVID from day one and very effective cures. And but they didn't want that. They wanted the vaccine only. And it was a rule there's a rule a you know a little known federal rule, that they were they were all aware of, which said that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization for vaccine if there is an existing remedy that has already been approved for any use.
The whole vaccine project would have fallen apart. They couldn't have done it. And so they decided that they were going to pretend that there was no cure except for the vaccine.

And they gave people a product that was not properly tested. And then now, we have a whole generation of kids that has myocarditis these terrible heart problems in young athletic boys, you're seeing so many kids now drop dead on playing fields. Right and that we never saw anything like this before. On average it was I think twenty nine a month globally athletes who died on the field. And we were getting down to hundreds a month now. There still has to be a reckoning. The mainstream media hasn't caught up with this science.
But the science is out there now and it's devastating."
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 105089
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: China's covert biological weapons program
Reply #1411 - Sep 8th, 2024 at 4:29pm
 
Mod Note: Post Removed - No Death Threats here Bobby. 1st warning.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 8th, 2024 at 5:27pm by SadKangaroo »  
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 105089
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: China's covert biological weapons program
Reply #1412 - Sep 9th, 2024 at 2:08pm
 
Mod Note: Post Removed - Excessive Spam.  Posting the image once is enough, but 8 times in the same thread is excessive


1,2,3,4,5,6,7

Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 9th, 2024 at 11:15pm by SadKangaroo »  
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 105089
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: China's covert biological weapons program
Reply #1413 - Sep 9th, 2024 at 2:17pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2024 at 4:29pm:
Mod Note: Post Removed - No Death Threats here Bobby. 1st warning.



It was a meme posted by Anthony Bouchard - a politician.
I am only a humble messenger who posts what's in the news.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Bouchard

Anthony Bouchard is an American politician serving as a member of
the Wyoming Senate from the 6th district since 2017, as a member of the Republican Party.

background:
https://wyofile.com/bouchard-calls-for-fauci-to-be-tried-then-executed/
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Moderator
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17271
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: China's covert biological weapons program
Reply #1414 - Sep 9th, 2024 at 11:14pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 9th, 2024 at 2:17pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2024 at 4:29pm:
Mod Note: Post Removed - No Death Threats here Bobby. 1st warning.



It was a meme posted by Anthony Bouchard - a politician.
I am only a humble messenger who posts what's in the news.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Bouchard

Anthony Bouchard is an American politician serving as a member of
the Wyoming Senate from the 6th district since 2017, as a member of the Republican Party.

background:
https://wyofile.com/bouchard-calls-for-fauci-to-be-tried-then-executed/


I don't care who said it, you posted it.  I don't care who the target is, a poster or public figure, no death threats.

If you can't accept that, perhaps The Fringe isn't for you.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 105089
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: China's covert biological weapons program
Reply #1415 - Sep 9th, 2024 at 11:38pm
 
SadKangaroo wrote on Sep 9th, 2024 at 11:14pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 9th, 2024 at 2:17pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2024 at 4:29pm:
Mod Note: Post Removed - No Death Threats here Bobby. 1st warning.



It was a meme posted by Anthony Bouchard - a politician.
I am only a humble messenger who posts what's in the news.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Bouchard

Anthony Bouchard is an American politician serving as a member of
the Wyoming Senate from the 6th district since 2017, as a member of the Republican Party.

background:
https://wyofile.com/bouchard-calls-for-fauci-to-be-tried-then-executed/


I don't care who said it, you posted it.  I don't care who the target is, a poster or public figure, no death threats.

If you can't accept that, perhaps The Fringe isn't for you.



Dear Mr Sad,
many blessings.
I thought the idea of Fringe was to discuss topics that would not normally be discussed
as they were considered to be possibly conspiracy theories with no basis in truth
and even the statements from politicians referring to that?
I will try to be good in future and obey your new rules.

namaste
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Moderator
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17271
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: China's covert biological weapons program
Reply #1416 - Sep 10th, 2024 at 6:25am
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 9th, 2024 at 11:38pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Sep 9th, 2024 at 11:14pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 9th, 2024 at 2:17pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2024 at 4:29pm:
Mod Note: Post Removed - No Death Threats here Bobby. 1st warning.



It was a meme posted by Anthony Bouchard - a politician.
I am only a humble messenger who posts what's in the news.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Bouchard

Anthony Bouchard is an American politician serving as a member of
the Wyoming Senate from the 6th district since 2017, as a member of the Republican Party.

background:
https://wyofile.com/bouchard-calls-for-fauci-to-be-tried-then-executed/


I don't care who said it, you posted it.  I don't care who the target is, a poster or public figure, no death threats.

If you can't accept that, perhaps The Fringe isn't for you.



Dear Mr Sad,
many blessings.
I thought the idea of Fringe was to discuss topics that would not normally be discussed
as they were considered to be possibly conspiracy theories with no basis in truth
and even the statements from politicians referring to that?
I will try to be good in future and obey your new rules.

namaste


You're free to discuss and explore conspiracy theories, and even present your ideas as facts. As much as it pains me, you can even make claims unsupported by evidence or those that fail to withstand basic scrutiny.  They may not resonate with others so don't expect the echo chamber treatment you're used.

That said, there are certain boundaries we must maintain. Any content, be it quotes, images, or posts advocating violence, such as threats to harm individuals (e.g., calls for the hanging of Dr. Fauci), will be removed. This also applies to material that breaches other forum rules, including racist content..

If the need arises to resort to threats or racial bigotry to make a point, it tends to undermine the strength of the argument itself anyway.

A respectful, evidence-based discourse will always be more effective in achieving constructive dialogue.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 47066
Gender: male
Re: China's covert biological weapons program
Reply #1417 - Sep 13th, 2024 at 8:07pm
 
This

Quote:
evidence-based discourse


is pretty hard to find on OzPol!
Back to top
 

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 105089
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: China's covert biological weapons program
Reply #1418 - Oct 24th, 2024 at 7:05am
 

The great coverup -



https://x.com/garyruskin/status/1847334684977746413



Gary Ruskin

@garyruskin
In a court hearing today before NC Judge Alyson Grine,
the University of North Carolina argued against disclosing to the public about 50,000 pages of documents,
mostly of Prof. Ralph Baric, possibly holding clues about the origins of Covid-19.

In her decision today, Judge Grine largely sided with UNC and against public disclosure.
However, Judge Grine did order UNC to make 251 documents public, including:
— 120 documents about research grant administration
— 20 documents that are manuscripts and presentations
— 23 materials transfer agreements
— 88 documents related to research project collaborations

We are disappointed in the outcome, and are evaluating our legal options, including appealing today’s ruling.


more here:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/taxpayers-paid-262-million-virologis...

A judge in North Carolina has rejected a Freedom of Information (FOIA) claim for documents that almost certainly contain crucial evidence about the origin of COVID-19.

The case was brought by the transparency group U.S. Right to Know. The target of the request was the world’s most renowned expert on coronaviruses and godfather of gain-of-function experiments, Ralph Baric, Ph.D., who runs the Baric Lab at the University of North Carolina (UNC).

Baric is the brains behind the 2018 DEFUSE blueprint for making COVID-19-like viruses in the lab. The blueprint was designed in collaboration with Shi Zhengli, the Director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, at whose lab some of the work was to have been done.

DEFUSE was not the first project on which Shi and Baric worked together. In 2015, they created SARS viruses in a lab that could infect humans. At the time, Rutgers biologist Richard Ebright warned that the Shi-Baric experiments would cause a worldwide pandemic. He was sadly proven right.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Moderator
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17271
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: China's covert biological weapons program
Reply #1419 - Oct 24th, 2024 at 7:27am
 
Bobby. wrote on Oct 24th, 2024 at 7:05am:
The great coverup -


Some background for your source,

Quote:
Children's Health Defense (CHD) is an American 501(c)(3) nonprofit activist group mainly known for anti-vaccine disinformation, and which has been called one of the main sources of misinformation on vaccines.

Founded under the name World Mercury Project in 2007, it is chaired by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

The group has been campaigning against various public health programs, such as vaccination and fluoridation of drinking water.

The group has been contributing to vaccine hesitancy in the United States, encouraging citizens and legislators to support anti-vaccine regulations and legislation.

Arguments against vaccination are contradicted by overwhelming scientific consensus about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines.

Its $15-million budget is funded through donations from individuals (both directly and anonymized through foundations) and affiliate marketing revenues.

More Info here


Even if you push that clear bias aside, the article makes strong claims regarding Ralph Baric, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and the COVID-19 pandemic, but it does not provide concrete proof to substantiate its assertions.

Instead, it relies heavily on inferences and suppositions.

The article makes several claims but lacks concrete evidence to back them up:

FOIA Rejection and Data Concealment: It alleges that Ralph Baric is hiding critical data related to the origins of COVID-19, but provides no proof that the concealed data contains such evidence.

Collaboration with Shi Zhengli: While Baric worked with the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s Shi Zhengli, the article offers no evidence that this collaboration is linked to the pandemic's origins.

Fauci’s Role: The article suggests Fauci lied about knowing Baric and implies a cover-up, but lacks proof of any improper connection between Fauci and Baric’s work.

Intellectual Property Rights: It criticises Baric’s claim of intellectual property over his data but doesn't provide legal reasoning or evidence of wrongdoing.

Judge Alyson Grine’s Decision: The article questions the judge's ruling in Baric’s favour, insinuating bias based on her background, but provides no proof of improper legal conduct.

The article relies heavily on speculation, insinuation, and rhetorical devices rather than presenting hard evidence to substantiate its claims about Baric or what is being hidden from the public.

There is not enough evidence to reach the conclusion that you have Bobbi, that it's been a great cover-up.

But when has that ever stopped you?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 105089
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: China's covert biological weapons program
Reply #1420 - Oct 24th, 2024 at 7:31am
 
Quote:
There is not enough evidence to reach the conclusion that you have Bobbi, that it's been a great cover-up.

But when has that ever stopped you?



Tax payers money was used for that research.
The public has a right to know what was going on.
To cover it up means that there is something to hide - what is it?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Moderator
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17271
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: China's covert biological weapons program
Reply #1421 - Oct 24th, 2024 at 7:50am
 
Bobby. wrote on Oct 24th, 2024 at 7:31am:
Quote:
There is not enough evidence to reach the conclusion that you have Bobbi, that it's been a great cover-up.

But when has that ever stopped you?



Tax payers money was used for that research.
The public has a right to know what was going on.
To cover it up means that there is something to hide - what is it?



It's ok if you don't understand what "evidence" means.

We can do a quick masterclass if you need to.

Just let me know.

A taste of that masterclass would be analysing what you've just done here.

You've not provided any evidence but asked leading questions to help the ready imply and reach the conclusion you want.

Asking questions that imply answers, also known as leading questions or loaded questions, is not a form of evidence.

This rhetorical technique can guide the reader toward a particular conclusion, but it does not present factual support or proof for a claim. Instead, it often relies on assumptions or emotional appeals to influence the reader's thinking.

While it may be a persuasive tool, using implied answers in the form of questions lacks the objective rigor required for evidence. Genuine evidence is based on verifiable facts, data, or logical reasoning, whereas implied questions merely nudge the reader toward a predetermined conclusion without substantiating it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 105089
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: China's covert biological weapons program
Reply #1422 - Oct 24th, 2024 at 8:02am
 
SadKangaroo wrote on Oct 24th, 2024 at 7:50am:
Bobby. wrote on Oct 24th, 2024 at 7:31am:
Quote:
There is not enough evidence to reach the conclusion that you have Bobbi, that it's been a great cover-up.

But when has that ever stopped you?



Tax payers money was used for that research.
The public has a right to know what was going on.
To cover it up means that there is something to hide - what is it?



It's ok if you don't understand what "evidence" means.

We can do a quick masterclass if you need to.

Just let me know.

A taste of that masterclass would be analysing what you've just done here.

You've not provided any evidence but asked leading questions to help the ready imply and reach the conclusion you want.

Asking questions that imply answers, also known as leading questions or loaded questions, is not a form of evidence.

This rhetorical technique can guide the reader toward a particular conclusion, but it does not present factual support or proof for a claim. Instead, it often relies on assumptions or emotional appeals to influence the reader's thinking.

While it may be a persuasive tool, using implied answers in the form of questions lacks the objective rigor required for evidence. Genuine evidence is based on verifiable facts, data, or logical reasoning, whereas implied questions merely nudge the reader toward a predetermined conclusion without substantiating it.



To cover it up means that there is something to hide - what is it?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Moderator
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17271
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: China's covert biological weapons program
Reply #1423 - Oct 24th, 2024 at 9:27am
 
Start with the ruling from the judge as to why the FOIA request was not granted.

Do you know the details about the ruling?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 105089
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: China's covert biological weapons program
Reply #1424 - Oct 24th, 2024 at 12:28pm
 
SadKangaroo wrote on Oct 24th, 2024 at 9:27am:
Start with the ruling from the judge as to why the FOIA request was not granted.

Do you know the details about the ruling?



No -
all we know is

"In her decision today, Judge Grine largely sided with UNC and against public disclosure."
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 93 94 95 96 97 ... 112
Send Topic Print