Page 101 - and I provide more evidence:



https://www.civilianintelligencenetwork.ca/2021/07/26/sars-cov-2-is-hiv-and-dr-a...




Shawn Paul Melvilleby Shawn Paul Melville

2021-07-26

I am roughing out a new series entitled “Project Sanguine” aka “Follow the Science: Fauci’s Nazi Transhumanist Scientists at Fort Detrick”. These articles have been on my mind a lot while writing “GQD Particle: The Transhumanist Agenda”, because this research takes us back to when these programs originated.

The Fauci Emails reveal that Dr Anthony Fauci was the one who threatened the Indian scientists and forced them to withdraw their study. We also know the article was pulled back after members of the medical community launched a campaign to withdraw that study, which no doubt included Dr. Fauci himself!

The article was suggesting that COVID-19 was created by inserting the particular Glycoprotein 120 (GP120) from the HIV-1 disease that involve patents held by or applied for by Fauci. What was even more upsetting was the suggestion that , and that the creator of the virus used GP120 to do so; a glycoprotein from the HIV-1 1990s era that tied back to Fauci. This statement is the most damning:

“We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 GP120 or HIV-1 Gag.”

The GP120 is the “Spike Protein” and the viral mRNA sequence inside the vaccines therefore codes for Glycoprotein 120. Simply put, when HIV triggers infection and inflammation in the body, Glycoprotein 120 (gp120) found on its outer membrane has to bind to proteins on human cells (Alpha4 Beta7 integrin proteins) which results in the immune system attacking healthy cells. The mRNA vaccines themselves carry the HIV-1 genes!

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v1





Prashant Pradhan, Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, Akhilesh Mishra, Parul Gupta, Praveen Kumar Tripathi, Manoj Balakrishnan Menon, James Gomes, Perumal Vivekanandan, Bishwajit Kundu

Abstract

We are currently witnessing a major epidemic caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). The evolution of 2019-nCoV remains elusive. We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag. Interestingly, despite the inserts being discontinuous on the primary amino acid sequence, 3D-modelling of the 2019-nCoV suggests that they converge to constitute the receptor binding site. The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature. This work provides yet unknown insights on 2019-nCoV and sheds light on the evolution and pathogenicity of this virus with important implications for diagnosis of this virus.

https://www.theburningplatform.com/2020/02/01/coronavirus-contains-hiv-insertion...


In addition, other recent studies have linked the 2019-nCoV to SARS CoV.

We therefore compared the spike glycoprotein sequences of the 2019-nCoV to that of the SARS CoV (NCBI Accession number: AY390556.1). On careful examination of the sequence alignment we found that the 2019- nCoV spike glycoprotein contains 4 insertions [Fig.2]. To further investigate if these inserts are present in any other corona virus, we performed a multiple sequence alignment of the spike glycoprotein amino acid sequences of all available coronaviruses (n=55) [refer Table S.File1] in NCBI refseq (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) this includes one sequence of 2019-nCoV[Fig.S1]. We found that these 4 insertions [inserts 1, 2, 3 and 4] are unique to 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses analyzed. Another group from China had documented three insertions comparing fewer spike glycoprotein sequences of coronaviruses . Another group from China had documented three insertions comparing fewer spike glycoprotein sequences of coronaviruses (Zhou et al., 2020).

We then translated the aligned genome and found that these inserts are present in all Wuhan 2019-nCoV viruses except the 2019-nCoV virus of Bat as a host [Fig.S4]. Intrigued by the 4 highly conserved inserts unique to 2019-nCoV we wanted to understand their origin. For this purpose, we used the 2019-nCoV local alignment with each insert as query against all virus genomes and considered hits with 100% sequence coverage.







Because when looking at the above insertions which are not present in any of the closest coronavirus families, “it is quite unlikely for a virus to have acquired such unique insertions naturally in a short duration of time.” Instead, they can be found in cell identification and membrane binding proteins located in the HIV genome.

YOU owe me SEVERAL apologies but aren’t man enough to apologise.

None of the crap you have posted has any relevance.

Cheap shot and wrong—you need to insult because you do not have the ability to think clearly and critically.

Tell me, idiot, where was the covid virus created? Evidence for that?

Answer my question please.

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12^th, 2024 at 7:42am:


At Wuhan and also possibly in Ukraine.

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12^th, 2024 at 7:45am:



I served the evidence to you on a plate.