Bobby. wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2021 at 12:54pm:


Anyone who says that really doesn't really know what the hell they're talking about.

You're regurgitating the latest buzzword from the butthurt extremists on the far right doing what they've said invalidates arguments used against them for decades, that being the comparison to Nazis.

Without googling it, I'd guess you couldn't even articulate what those trials were about and who was targeted.

But that's only for you to know since none of us can trust you didn't just google it before replying.

Either way, pushing all of that aside, a trial requires evidence and motive, something we don't yet have to lend any legitimacy to the claim.

But it's especially funny hearing the fake tradies and the bunnings Karen talk about taking Dictator Dan to Nuremberg 2.0.

Anyone who makes those claims is basically identifying themselves as a gullible sheep doing the bidding of those pulling their strings, of course, while calling everyone else sheep.

They have literally zero self-awareness or even understanding about what they're talking about, but all the confidence in the world yet despite being bathed in such ignorance, they're still 100% correct.

You've posted 39 pages of crap you've been fed online.

I've read the entire thread, none of it is in any way compelling evidence to anyone who doesn't already believe it's a covert bio weapon from China before even seeing any evidence.

And that's the problem, you already made you mind up then went looking for "evidence" after the fact.

SadKangaroo wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2021 at 4:55pm:


‘Afer the fact’ ? What fact ?
The problem is few who haunt the internet in order to support their presuppositions know what the term ‘proof’ means. There’s also little point in attempting to convince the deluded the web isn’t a reliable source of scientific evidence for anything.

Did the coronavirus jump from animals to people twice?
A preliminary analysis of viral genomes suggests the COVID-19 pandemic might have multiple animal origins — but the findings still have to be peer reviewed.

[Raccoon dogs are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 and were sold at multiple markets in Wuhan.]

SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, could have spilled from animals to people multiple times, according to a preliminary analysis of viral genomes sampled from people infected in China and elsewhere early in the pandemic.

If confirmed by further analyses, the findings would add weight to the hypothesis that the pandemic originated in multiple markets in Wuhan, and make the hypothesis that SARS-COV-2 escaped from a laboratory less likely, say some researchers. But the data need to be verified, and the analysis has not yet been peer reviewed.

WHO report into COVID pandemic origins zeroes in on animal markets, not la
The earliest viral sequences, taken from people infected in late 2019 and early 2020, are split into two broad lineages, known as A and B, which have key genetic differences.

Lineage B has become the dominant lineage globally and includes samples taken from people who visited the Huanan seafood market in Wuhan, which also sold wild animals. Lineage A spread within China, and includes samples from people linked to other markets in Wuhan.

A crucial question is how the two viral lineages are related. If viruses in lineage A evolved from those in lineage B, or vice versa, that would suggest that the progenitor of the virus jumped just once from animals to people. But if the two lineages have separate origins, then there might have been multiple spillover events.