Bobby. wrote on Sep 24
th, 2021 at 7:02am:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/09/22/report-wuhan-lab-sought-funding-to...Report: Wuhan Lab Sought Funding to Create,
Release ‘Enhanced’ Coronaviruses into Bats
https://media.gab.com/system/preview_cards/images/016/955/146/original/afa3a5f7d...Researchers also wanted to create chimeric viruses that were “genetically enhanced to infect humans more easily, and requested $14 million from the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to fund the work,” the Telegraph reports. The papers show the researchers were hoping to introduce “human-specific cleavage sites” to bat coronaviruses, which would make it easier for the virus to enter human cells.
As the Telegraph noted, “When Covid-19 was first genetically sequenced, scientists were puzzled about how the virus had evolved such a human-specific adaptation at the cleavage site on the spike protein, which is the reason it is so infectious.”
“The scary part is they were making infectious chimeric Mers viruses,” the researcher said.
“These viruses have a fatality rate over 30 per cent, which is at least an order of magnitude more deadly than Sars-CoV-2. If one of their receptor replacements made Mers spread similarly, while maintaining its lethality,
this pandemic would be nearly apocalyptic.” Ecohealth allaince run by Peter Daszak tried to get DARPA to fund this new virus.
Peter Daszak was also behind the letter written claiming it couldn't have come from a lab also on team investigating in Wuhan. He never mentioned these conflicts of interest.
From the source in your link
Quote:16. THE PROPOSAL INCLUDES THE INTRODUCTION OF “HUMAN-SPECIFIC CLEAVAGE
SITES”
We will analyze all SARSr-CoV S gene sequences for appropriately conserved proteolytic
cleavage sites in S2 and for the presence of potential Furin cleavage sites74,75”
.
SARSr-CoV S with mismatches in proteolytic cleavage sites can be activated by exogenous Trypsin or Cathepsin L.
Where clear mismatches occur, we will introduce appropriate human-specific cleavage sites
and evaluate growth potential in Vero cells and HAE cultures.”https://drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/defuse-project-drastic-analy... The people from DRASTIC also wrote this which is beyond Monkey man and SK comprehansion levels take note of novel furin cleavage site mentioned above.
Quote:Conclusion
More than a year after the initial documented cases in Wuhan, the source of SARS-CoV-2 has yet to be identified, and the search for a direct or intermediate host in nature has been so far unsuccessful. The low binding affinity of SARS-CoV-2 to bat ACE2 studied to date does not support Chiroptera as a direct zoonotic agent. Furthermore, the reliance on pangolin coronavirus receptor binding domain (RBD) similarity to SARS-CoV-2 as evidence for natural zoonotic spillover is flawed, as pangolins are unlikely to play a role in SARS-CoV-2′s origin and recombination is not supported by recent analysis.
At the same time, genomic analyses pointed out that SARS-CoV-2 exhibits multiple peculiar characteristics not found in other Sarbecoviruses. A novel multibasic furin cleavage site (FCS) confers numerous pathogenetically advantageous capabilities, the existence of which is difficult to explain though natural evolution; SARS-CoV-2 to human ACE2 binding is far stronger than SARS-CoV, yet there is no indication of amount of evolutionary adaptation that SARS-CoV or MERS-CoV underwent. More here unlike monks bullshit this link has relevant cites-
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10311-021-01211-0
Forum
Pages: 
China's covert biological weapons program (Read 137051 times)
