Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 8
Send Topic Print
Psychological Analysis of Trump's Support (Read 6367 times)
AiA
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 18405
Gender: male
Re: Psychological Analysis of Trump's Support
Reply #15 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 7:29am
 
aquascoot wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 6:33am:
The whole pretext of this article is back-to-front
you don't need a psychological analysis of Trump supporters
you need a psychological analysis of trump's powers of persuasion
And those are at the Pinnacle
Those Powers are off the Richter scale
They are superhuman
Definitely worth studying for 5 years
Maybe mayor Bloomberg could do that


Bloomberg net worth: US$62.8bn

Combined net worth of all US presidents ever: US$5bn

Who has superpowers?
Back to top
 

“Jerry, just remember: It’s not a lie … if you believe it.” George Costanza
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20471
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Psychological Analysis of Trump's Support
Reply #16 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 7:49am
 
mothra wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:13am:
Gordon wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 7:44am:
I think they're approaching it from the wrong side.

People voted for Trump because the alternative was so unpalatable.  Hillary and Trump are both liars but when Trump lies, he winks while Hillary thinks she's fooling people.

Hillary and Trump are both arseholes but Trump owns it while Hillary tries to sell her self as being a moral person.


Hilary received over 3,000,000 more votes than Trump, so there goes that theory.


Why do you support someone like this, Moths?

About six months after her initial interviews in 1999, Broaddrick told the Drudge Report that mere weeks after the alleged assault, Hillary Clinton had tried to thank her for her silence on the matter at a political rally:

"[Hillary] came directly to me as soon as she hit the door. I had been there only a few minutes, I only wanted to make an appearance and leave. She caught me and took my hand and said 'I am so happy to meet you. I want you to know that we appreciate everything you do for Bill.' I started to turn away and she held onto my hand and reiterated her phrase -- looking less friendly and repeated her statement — 'Everything you do for Bill'. I said nothing. She wasn't letting me get away until she made her point. She talked low, the smile faded on the second thank you. I just released her hand from mine and left the gathering."

https://www.vox.com/2016/1/6/10722580/bill-clinton-juanita-broaddrick
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95165
Gender: male
Re: Psychological Analysis of Trump's Support
Reply #17 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 8:00am
 
Gordon wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 7:49am:
mothra wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:13am:
Gordon wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 7:44am:
I think they're approaching it from the wrong side.

People voted for Trump because the alternative was so unpalatable.  Hillary and Trump are both liars but when Trump lies, he winks while Hillary thinks she's fooling people.

Hillary and Trump are both arseholes but Trump owns it while Hillary tries to sell her self as being a moral person.


Hilary received over 3,000,000 more votes than Trump, so there goes that theory.


Why do you support someone like this, Moths?

About six months after her initial interviews in 1999, Broaddrick told the Drudge Report that mere weeks after the alleged assault, Hillary Clinton had tried to thank her for her silence on the matter at a political rally:

"[Hillary] came directly to me as soon as she hit the door. I had been there only a few minutes, I only wanted to make an appearance and leave. She caught me and took my hand and said 'I am so happy to meet you. I want you to know that we appreciate everything you do for Bill.' I started to turn away and she held onto my hand and reiterated her phrase -- looking less friendly and repeated her statement — 'Everything you do for Bill'. I said nothing. She wasn't letting me get away until she made her point. She talked low, the smile faded on the second thank you. I just released her hand from mine and left the gathering."

https://www.vox.com/2016/1/6/10722580/bill-clinton-juanita-broaddrick


Someone who awkwardly tries to comfort a victim of sexual harassment or someone who brags about grabbing them by the pussy because he's a star?

Gee, Gordon, that's a hard one.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20471
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Psychological Analysis of Trump's Support
Reply #18 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 8:06am
 
Awkward?
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95165
Gender: male
Re: Psychological Analysis of Trump's Support
Reply #19 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 8:11am
 
Gordon wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 8:06am:
Awkward?


What do you call it? Hillary's done more apologising for her husband's escapades than any wife in history.

Trump's wives normally file for divorce. His mistresses just take a payout and sign the non-disclosure agreement.

And his supporters lap it all up while they condemn Hillary for her husband's infidelities.

You?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20471
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Psychological Analysis of Trump's Support
Reply #20 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 8:39am
 
Karnal wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 8:11am:
Gordon wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 8:06am:
Awkward?


What do you call it? Hillary's done more apologising for her husband's escapades than any wife in history.

Trump's wives normally file for divorce. His mistresses just take a payout and sign the non-disclosure agreement.

And his supporters lap it all up while they condemn Hillary for her husband's infidelities.

You?


Apologising for infidelity is same as covering for rape?

How very Muslim of you.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20471
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Psychological Analysis of Trump's Support
Reply #21 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 8:41am
 
As she tells the story, they spent only a few minutes chatting by the window -- Clinton pointed to an old jail he wanted to renovate if he became governor -- before he began kissing her. She resisted his advances, she said, but soon he pulled her back onto the bed and forcibly had sex with her. She said she did not scream because everything happened so quickly. Her upper lip was bruised and swollen after the encounter because, she said, he had grabbed onto it with his mouth.

"The last thing he said to me was, 'You better get some ice for that.' And he put on his sunglasses and walked out the door," she recalled.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Richdude
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8457
NC
Gender: male
Re: Psychological Analysis of Trump's Support
Reply #22 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 8:43am
 
Karnal wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 8:11am:
Gordon wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 8:06am:
Awkward?


What do you call it? Hillary's done more apologising for her husband's escapades than any wife in history.

Trump's wives normally file for divorce. His mistresses just take a payout and sign the non-disclosure agreement.

And his supporters lap it all up while they condemn Hillary for her husband's infidelities.

You?



Simple!

  Hillary wasn't going to let Bill's indiscretions get in the way of her Presidential ambitions. Anything and everything was swept under the carpet.

Kama finally caught up with her in 2016.

Hillary's mentor was satanist and communist Saul Alinsky. I'm not a fan - you?
Back to top
 

The mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the man who refuses to bow blindly to conventional prejudices and chooses instead to express his opinions courageously and honestly.”
 
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: Psychological Analysis of Trump's Support
Reply #23 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 8:56am
 

Bobby Azarian Ph.D is absolutely full of crap.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34245
Gender: male
Re: Psychological Analysis of Trump's Support
Reply #24 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 9:04am
 
AiA wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 7:29am:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 6:33am:
The whole pretext of this article is back-to-front
you don't need a psychological analysis of Trump supporters
you need a psychological analysis of trump's powers of persuasion
And those are at the Pinnacle
Those Powers are off the Richter scale
They are superhuman
Definitely worth studying for 5 years
Maybe mayor Bloomberg could do that


Bloomberg net worth: US$62.8bn

Combined net worth of all US presidents ever: US$5bn

Who has superpowers?



No doubt that Bloomberg is a more successful businessman then the Donald
Doubtful at Bloomberg is a more successful public speaker than the Donald

Go back and read the article
There's something about Trump that people enjoy watching
They remain in a heightened state of pleasure for seriously long periods of time

I just can't imagine Bloomberg on The apprentice

Bloomberg would put a sedative to sleep
Bloomberg makes sleepy Joe look like a kid with ADHD

Everyone is just playing catch up football
The Donald has created a paradigm shift
He has stirred up The hornet's nest in Washington
Democrats are perpetually reacting to the Donald

It's one of those crazy things
the Donald says that he needs Twitter to punch through because the mainstream media won't cover him
No one has ever receive more coverage than the Donald

He has celebrity status and star status
the paparazzi just don't follow people like Elizabeth Warren and Pete buttigieg around
They just don't have that star quality
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AiA
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 18405
Gender: male
Re: Psychological Analysis of Trump's Support
Reply #25 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 9:13am
 
aquascoot wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 9:04am:
AiA wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 7:29am:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 6:33am:
The whole pretext of this article is back-to-front
you don't need a psychological analysis of Trump supporters
you need a psychological analysis of trump's powers of persuasion
And those are at the Pinnacle
Those Powers are off the Richter scale
They are superhuman
Definitely worth studying for 5 years
Maybe mayor Bloomberg could do that


Bloomberg net worth: US$62.8bn

Combined net worth of all US presidents ever: US$5bn

Who has superpowers?



No doubt that Bloomberg is a more successful businessman then the Donald
Doubtful at Bloomberg is a more successful public speaker than the Donald

Go back and read the article
There's something about Trump that people enjoy watching
They remain in a heightened state of pleasure for seriously long periods of time

I just can't imagine Bloomberg on The apprentice

Bloomberg would put a sedative to sleep
Bloomberg makes sleepy Joe look like a kid with ADHD

Everyone is just playing catch up football
The Donald has created a paradigm shift
He has stirred up The hornet's nest in Washington
Democrats are perpetually reacting to the Donald

It's one of those crazy things
the Donald says that he needs Twitter to punch through because the mainstream media won't cover him
No one has ever receive more coverage than the Donald

He has celebrity status and star status
the paparazzi just don't follow people like Elizabeth Warren and Pete buttigieg around
They just don't have that star quality


You are right: Bloomberg is no entertainer, and Trump is all entertainer.
Back to top
 

“Jerry, just remember: It’s not a lie … if you believe it.” George Costanza
WWW  
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35220
Gender: female
Re: Psychological Analysis of Trump's Support
Reply #26 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 9:39am
 
Karnal wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 6:45pm:
mothra wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 11:11am:
"6. The Power of Mortality Reminders and Perceived Existential Threat

A well-supported theory from social psychology, known as Terror Management Theory, explains why Trump’s fear mongering is doubly effective. The theory is based on the fact that humans have a unique awareness of their own mortality. The inevitably of one’s death creates existential terror and anxiety that is always residing below the surface. In order to manage this terror, humans adopt cultural worldviews — like religions, political ideologies, and national identities — that act as a buffer by instilling life with meaning and value.

Terror Management Theory predicts that when people are reminded of their own mortality, which happens with fear mongering, they will more strongly defend those who share their worldviews and national or ethnic identity, and act out more aggressively towards those who do not. Hundreds of studies have supported this hypothesis, and some have specifically shown that triggering thoughts of death tends to shift people towards the right.

Not only do death reminders increase nationalism, they may influence voting habits in favor of more conservative presidential candidates. And more disturbingly, in a study with American students, scientists found that making mortality salient increased support for extreme military interventions by American forces that could kill thousands of civilians overseas. Interestingly, the effect was present only in conservatives.

By constantly emphasizing existential threat, Trump may be creating a psychological condition that makes the brain respond positively rather than negatively to bigoted statements and divisive rhetoric."



This forum, in a nutshell.



That's interesting, Mother, but do you think the knuckleheads here are really scared?

Every time you point out the lack of terror attacks here they say, well yes, we're okay now, but...

They're more worried about the sight of the tinted races than they are of being killed. It's a form of virtue signalling. They need somebody to feel superior to. The ones who complain never actually know any.

Remember, the most Jew-hating Germans in the Nazi era were the ones who didn't know any Jews. I doubt people feared sinister Jews stealing Christian children or whatever. The propagated threat of the Jew was a way to drum up hate more than fear.

The haters are always the most insecure in their own sense of identity - particularly their class. They translate this into race, and do you know?

The biggest haters are nearly always immigrants themselves. Check them out on this site. Nearly all of them live in a different country to the one they grew up in.

They long for an idyllic past that was never really there. They yearn so hard to be respected, in the same way they believe the authority figures in their own childhoods were.



Oh i think they're absolutely terrified. Terrified their male, white privilege is under threat.

Just last night, major culprit Grappler informed me that you can't give someone rights without taking them away from someone else. Yes, they really think like this.

I would go further as to say the more introspective among them may even fear the audit, not just the prospect of having to share a society with those they think inferior.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35220
Gender: female
Re: Psychological Analysis of Trump's Support
Reply #27 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 9:42am
 
Gordon wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 7:49am:
mothra wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:13am:
Gordon wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 7:44am:
I think they're approaching it from the wrong side.

People voted for Trump because the alternative was so unpalatable.  Hillary and Trump are both liars but when Trump lies, he winks while Hillary thinks she's fooling people.

Hillary and Trump are both arseholes but Trump owns it while Hillary tries to sell her self as being a moral person.


Hilary received over 3,000,000 more votes than Trump, so there goes that theory.


Why do you support someone like this, Moths?

About six months after her initial interviews in 1999, Broaddrick told the Drudge Report that mere weeks after the alleged assault, Hillary Clinton had tried to thank her for her silence on the matter at a political rally:

"[Hillary] came directly to me as soon as she hit the door. I had been there only a few minutes, I only wanted to make an appearance and leave. She caught me and took my hand and said 'I am so happy to meet you. I want you to know that we appreciate everything you do for Bill.' I started to turn away and she held onto my hand and reiterated her phrase -- looking less friendly and repeated her statement — 'Everything you do for Bill'. I said nothing. She wasn't letting me get away until she made her point. She talked low, the smile faded on the second thank you. I just released her hand from mine and left the gathering."

https://www.vox.com/2016/1/6/10722580/bill-clinton-juanita-broaddrick



Why on earth would me stating that Hilary received 3,000,000 million more votes than \Trump, thus negating your comment that the public got what they wanted, translate into me supporting Hillary? I didn't make it up to pimp her .. it's just a simple fact.

More Americans wanted Clinton as POTUS than Trump, so you're just wrong.

Where have i ever stated any support for Hilary? Ever?
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20471
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Psychological Analysis of Trump's Support
Reply #28 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 9:54am
 
mothra wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 9:42am:
Gordon wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 7:49am:
mothra wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:13am:
Gordon wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 7:44am:
I think they're approaching it from the wrong side.

People voted for Trump because the alternative was so unpalatable.  Hillary and Trump are both liars but when Trump lies, he winks while Hillary thinks she's fooling people.

Hillary and Trump are both arseholes but Trump owns it while Hillary tries to sell her self as being a moral person.


Hilary received over 3,000,000 more votes than Trump, so there goes that theory.


Why do you support someone like this, Moths?

About six months after her initial interviews in 1999, Broaddrick told the Drudge Report that mere weeks after the alleged assault, Hillary Clinton had tried to thank her for her silence on the matter at a political rally:

"[Hillary] came directly to me as soon as she hit the door. I had been there only a few minutes, I only wanted to make an appearance and leave. She caught me and took my hand and said 'I am so happy to meet you. I want you to know that we appreciate everything you do for Bill.' I started to turn away and she held onto my hand and reiterated her phrase -- looking less friendly and repeated her statement — 'Everything you do for Bill'. I said nothing. She wasn't letting me get away until she made her point. She talked low, the smile faded on the second thank you. I just released her hand from mine and left the gathering."

https://www.vox.com/2016/1/6/10722580/bill-clinton-juanita-broaddrick



Why on earth would me stating that Hilary received 3,000,000 million more votes than \Trump, thus negating your comment that the public got what they wanted, translate into me supporting Hillary? I didn't make it up to pimp her .. it's just a simple fact.

More Americans wanted Clinton as POTUS than Trump, so you're just wrong.

Where have i ever stated any support for Hilary? Ever?


Irrelevant, who is POTUS?

Seems Hillary has dodged defending her rapist husband just as well as dodged the sniper bullets at Sarajevo  Grin
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35220
Gender: female
Re: Psychological Analysis of Trump's Support
Reply #29 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 9:56am
 
Irrelevant? What, the answer to your question?

Kinda makes your question look pretty foolish, no?

POTUS = President of the United States.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 8
Send Topic Print