Sprintcyclist wrote on Mar 7
th, 2020 at 1:06pm:
Have they ever falsified any original data upwards?
So the current readings appear cooler?
Or are ALL the 'changes' made downwards, so the current readings look warmer?
The older ones are marked down, relatively few of the newer ones.
"Conversely, the effects of global warming are
evaluated by the Australian Bureau of
Meteorology (BOM) with a continuously evolving
procedure based on a constantly evolving data
set, where arbitrary changes of the temperatures
collected in the past is the norm rather than the
exception. This practice of arbitrarily cooling
down the past to magnify the warming has been
the subject of our past works [1-4]."
"Adjustments that cool historic temperatures have
almost doubled Australia’s rate of warming that is
otherwise mostly the artificial warming due to the
establishment of urban heat island (UHI) about
the thermometer locations. Two additional data
sets have been recently brought to the attention
of the scientific community by Gillham [5] to
support the claim that the Australian global
warming is man-made but only through
corrections by the local Bureau of Meteorology
(BOM)."
https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/38584/1/38584%20Parker%202015.pdf