Anyhow FD, if for whatever reason you do ever feel inclined to address what I actually said, I suggest this little paragraph:

Quote:


Just focus on the first sentence if the rest is a bit too much for you.

List of Killings in the Name of Islam:

Last 30 Days: During this time period, there were 121 Islamic attacks in 20 countries, in which 577 people were killed and 399 injured.

Jihad Report JULY / 04 / 2020 - JULY / 10 / 2020: Attacks 37 - Killed 209 - Injured 199 - Suicide Blasts 2 - Countries 10.

So far for 2020: During this time period, there were 1032 Islamic attacks in 40 countries, in which 5271 people were killed and 4001 injured.

There has been over 37261 deadly muslim terrorist attacks since September 2001

Now I'd go so far as to say muslims slaughter and wound more people in a week that the entire number for White, right wing terrorism attacks since September 2001.

I'd also go so far as to say that funding would be proportionally equal to the actual number of attacks.

I'd would also go so far as to say that muslims spend 100s of 1000s of dollars on terrorism, whereas right wing terrorism would be in the very few thousand of dollars on terrorism, with no suicide bombing terrorism at all in right wing terrorism.

So in light of the fact that terrorism is almost a national sport in islamic circles, while right wing terrorism is almost non existent, I would love to be as sure of winning the powerball tonight as I am that it's a 99.99999999999% certainty that freedivers website spend zero dollars on right wing terrorism.

freediver wrote on Jul 16^th, 2020 at 6:01pm:


lol no I didn't. Are you really this clueless, or do you actually go out of your way to think up the most absurd thing imaginable to say?

freediver wrote on Jul 16^th, 2020 at 6:01pm:


saying someone(s) illegally sends anything other than 0% of their money towards criminals is literally saying they are guilty of a crime - agreed? Yes or no FD.

So the only way of asserting their innocence in this particular crime is to say they send 0% - agree? Yes or no.

Thus if we were to apply the principle of the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, asserting that halal certifiers illegally send 0% of their fees to terrorists in the absense of any evidence to the contrary - is perfectly consistent with this principle. Its actually an exceedingly simple proposition FD, try and get your head around it if you can. If you still disagree, I look forward to an actual coherent rebuttle as to why you disagree - rather than just the same "its wrong because its wrong" broken record that you've been chirping away inanely this entire thread.

freediver wrote on Jul 16^th, 2020 at 6:01pm:


Oh yes, really I do. Please. "Explain it to me" is basically what I've been begging you to do this entire thread FD.

"Explain to me" why this is such an "absurd lie" but asserting that 0% of your ad revenues are sent to far right terrorists is (presumably) not. I've only asked that one about a dozen times now.

freediver wrote on Jul 17^th, 2020 at 7:16pm:


FD's quoting someone saying something very sinister here, G. Can you quote who said 1.0% of "halal fees" go to terrorists?

And can you say why they added the .0?

freediver wrote on Jul 17^th, 2020 at 7:16pm:


You do not need evidence of absense when presuming innocence FD. Thats where you fail on this one.

But of course I've pointed this out to you before - you know the last time you tried this same brainless logical fallacy.

Quote:


Oh I know FD, and there's other ghastly examples too you know - oooh lets see - here's one: "zero percent of ozpolitic's ad revenue is illegally sent to far right terrorists". How dare I peddle such lies eh FD? So.... so.... muslim of me.

Gandi I don't need to be bitten by a taipan, to know it's deadly.

I don't need to be blown up by a muslim, to know that muslim terrorists are the worlds greatest terrorist threat.

I don't need to read the bank statements, to know that muslims spend more money than anybody else on terrorism.

If we take it as a given that funding for terrorism is equivalent to the amount of terrorism generated.

It is also a given that muslims commit acts of terrorism, thousands of times more than other non muslim types of terrorism.

Given that islamic terrorism is permeated throughout the entire global muslim population, all receiving funding from thousands of hidden sponsors globally.

It is the depths of stupidity to say that absolutely 100%, there is no way any halal fees go towards islamic terrorism.

Do you want the troll to play his ditty for you gandi?

I would like to be as sure of winning the lotto, as I am that on the grounds of probability, part of halal fees go towards funding global islamic terrorism.

You will always be yoked to islamic terrorism gandi, until you find the courage to question and purge the many verses of evil in your qur'an.

But then you can't do that can you?

We all know to question the qur'an and remove the satanical verses of evil, will while stopping islamic human rights atrocities, also destroy islam in a heartbeat (no more infallible perfect words of allah, no more qur'an, no more islam).

Oh well enjoy it while you can gandi, one day the world will wake up and turn on you.

moses wrote on Jul 21^st, 2020 at 2:39pm:


You do however need to read the bank statements of halal certifiers to know whether or not they are sending money to terrorists.

pathetic non-response - as always moses.

As you were.