Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 ... 35
Send Topic Print
Halal fees and terrorism funding (Read 42973 times)
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96969
Re: Halal fees and terrorism funding
Reply #330 - Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:16pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 26th, 2020 at 9:33pm:
There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.


He's got you there, G.

FD? G's not allowed to say 0% of evidence, but the the old boy claims 0% of non evidence. Can we count that as 100% proof of evidence?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 48607
Gender: male
Re: Halal fees and terrorism funding
Reply #331 - Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:48pm
 
Karnal wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:16pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 26th, 2020 at 9:33pm:
There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.


He's got you there, G.

FD? G's not allowed to say 0% of evidence, but the the old boy claims 0% of non evidence. Can we count that as 100% proof of evidence?




1.Muslims fund jihad.
2. Muslims fund jihad in clandestine/ illegal ways.
3. Many Muslim  charities are fronts for jihadi funding.
4. Muslim charity IS jihad.
5.  There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.
THEREFORE:
Some unknown proportion of halal certification, as of muslim charity funds, IS funding terrorism, aka jihad. Jihad in kuffar lands IS terrorism.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: Halal fees and terrorism funding
Reply #332 - Aug 27th, 2020 at 2:00pm
 
@ karnal
Quote:
I see. So G has to agree with everything you say or admit to being a dirty child killer. We'll have to run this one past the mods, Moses.

Moderator, what do you think of such a claim? Do you think G's a devious paedophile if he refuses to agree with what Moses just said?

Do you think Muslims and their apologists should decry their friends, family and inferior culture and join Moses on the side of superior skin pigmentation and hatred of the despicable Musel subspecies?

FD wants an answer too, G. A simple yes or no will suffice, please.


Oh the fallacious melodramatics karnal.

Are you too dumb to know the difference between a supporter and a perpetrator?

There are 26 football layers on a field and 50000 supporters in the stands (got the difference?)

There are thousands of muslim rapists torturers and mass murderers who cite the qur'an as their cause and motivation, there are millions of muslims who revere and support the qur'an as being unchangeable and infallible, they by definition revere and support the engendered rape torture and mass slaughter.

G can tell us where he stands. Does he support the qur'an as it is right now, causing and motivating thousands of rapes, tortures and mass salughters, or does he support the evil in the qur'an being denounced and purged, in order to stop all the human rights atrocities being committed by muslims who are following the qur'an?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49586
At my desk.
Re: Halal fees and terrorism funding
Reply #333 - Aug 27th, 2020 at 5:51pm
 
Karnal wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:16pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 26th, 2020 at 9:33pm:
There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.


He's got you there, G.

FD? G's not allowed to say 0% of evidence, but the the old boy claims 0% of non evidence. Can we count that as 100% proof of evidence?


They have processes to cover it up. For Gandalf, it is reflexive.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96969
Re: Halal fees and terrorism funding
Reply #334 - Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:01pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:48pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:16pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 26th, 2020 at 9:33pm:
There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.


He's got you there, G.

FD? G's not allowed to say 0% of evidence, but the the old boy claims 0% of non evidence. Can we count that as 100% proof of evidence?




1.Muslims fund jihad.
2. Muslims fund jihad in clandestine/ illegal ways.
3. Many Muslim  charities are fronts for jihadi funding.
4. Muslim charity IS jihad.
5.  There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.
THEREFORE:
Some unknown proportion of halal certification, as of muslim charity funds, IS funding terrorism, aka jihad. Jihad in kuffar lands IS terrorism.


And yes, the old boy studied ethics at the prestigious University of Balogney.

Superior culture, innit.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96969
Re: Halal fees and terrorism funding
Reply #335 - Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:02pm
 
freediver wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 5:51pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:16pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 26th, 2020 at 9:33pm:
There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.


He's got you there, G.

FD? G's not allowed to say 0% of evidence, but the the old boy claims 0% of non evidence. Can we count that as 100% proof of evidence?


They have processes to cover it up. For Gandalf, it is reflexive.


What percentage of these processes do we have evidence for, FD?

I'm keen to hear what you think.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96969
Re: Halal fees and terrorism funding
Reply #336 - Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:05pm
 
moses wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 2:00pm:
@ karnal
Quote:
I see. So G has to agree with everything you say or admit to being a dirty child killer. We'll have to run this one past the mods, Moses.

Moderator, what do you think of such a claim? Do you think G's a devious paedophile if he refuses to agree with what Moses just said?

Do you think Muslims and their apologists should decry their friends, family and inferior culture and join Moses on the side of superior skin pigmentation and hatred of the despicable Musel subspecies?

FD wants an answer too, G. A simple yes or no will suffice, please.


Oh the fallacious melodramatics karnal.

Are you too dumb to know the difference between a supporter and a perpetrator?

There are 26 football layers on a field and 50000 supporters in the stands (got the difference?)

There are thousands of muslim rapists torturers and mass murderers who cite the qur'an as their cause and motivation, there are millions of muslims who revere and support the qur'an as being unchangeable and infallible, they by definition revere and support the engendered rape torture and mass slaughter.

G can tell us where he stands. Does he support the qur'an as it is right now, causing and motivating thousands of rapes, tortures and mass salughters, or does he support the evil in the qur'an being denounced and purged, in order to stop all the human rights atrocities being committed by muslims who are following the qur'an?


Are you asking G again, Moses? What did he say the first few times?

G's not here, so why don't you tell us what he said?

Not you, FD.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 48607
Gender: male
Re: Halal fees and terrorism funding
Reply #337 - Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:36pm
 
Karnal wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:01pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:48pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:16pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 26th, 2020 at 9:33pm:
There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.


He's got you there, G.

FD? G's not allowed to say 0% of evidence, but the the old boy claims 0% of non evidence. Can we count that as 100% proof of evidence?




1.Muslims fund jihad.
2. Muslims fund jihad in clandestine/ illegal ways.
3. Many Muslim  charities are fronts for jihadi funding.
4. Muslim charity IS jihad.
5.  There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.
THEREFORE:
Some unknown proportion of halal certification, as of muslim charity funds, IS funding terrorism, aka jihad. Jihad in kuffar lands IS terrorism.


And yes, the old boy studied ethics at the prestigious University of Balogney.

Superior culture, innit.

It is.

You are not refuting my points, PB. No can do?  Go on, 10 rupee in it for you.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96969
Re: Halal fees and terrorism funding
Reply #338 - Aug 29th, 2020 at 5:32pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:36pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:01pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:48pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:16pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 26th, 2020 at 9:33pm:
There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.


He's got you there, G.

FD? G's not allowed to say 0% of evidence, but the the old boy claims 0% of non evidence. Can we count that as 100% proof of evidence?




1.Muslims fund jihad.
2. Muslims fund jihad in clandestine/ illegal ways.
3. Many Muslim  charities are fronts for jihadi funding.
4. Muslim charity IS jihad.
5.  There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.
THEREFORE:
Some unknown proportion of halal certification, as of muslim charity funds, IS funding terrorism, aka jihad. Jihad in kuffar lands IS terrorism.


And yes, the old boy studied ethics at the prestigious University of Balogney.

Superior culture, innit.

It is.

You are not refuting my points, PB. No can do?  Go on, 10 rupee in it for you.



You haven't made a point to refute, you eminent graduate of the prestigious University of Balogney you.

The clearest thing you've said here is that your idiotic preening is superior to facts and evidence.

We'll leave that one to FD.

FD? Do you concur? Or would you prefer to wait for G to confess that he's forced to defend his fellow Muselman?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 48607
Gender: male
Re: Halal fees and terrorism funding
Reply #339 - Aug 29th, 2020 at 6:17pm
 
FtKarnal wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 5:32pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:36pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:01pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:48pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:16pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 26th, 2020 at 9:33pm:
There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.


He's got you there, G.

FD? G's not allowed to say 0% of evidence, but the the old boy claims 0% of non evidence. Can we count that as 100% proof of evidence?




1.Muslims fund jihad.
2. Muslims fund jihad in clandestine/ illegal ways.
3. Many Muslim  charities are fronts for jihadi funding.
4. Muslim charity IS jihad.
5.  There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.
THEREFORE:
Some unknown proportion of halal certification, as of muslim charity funds, IS funding terrorism, aka jihad. Jihad in kuffar lands IS terrorism.


And yes, the old boy studied ethics at the prestigious University of Balogney.

Superior culture, innit.

It is.

You are not refuting my points, PB. No can do?  Go on, 10 rupee in it for you.



You haven't made a point to refute, you eminent graduate of the prestigious University of Balogney you.

The clearest thing you've said here is that your idiotic preening is superior to facts and evidence.

We'll leave that one to FD.

FD? Do you concur? Or would you prefer to wait for G to confess that he's forced to defend his fellow Muselman?

I have made 6 points, you refuted none of them.  I even numbered 5 of them.  You no can see?  Wanked yourself blind already?

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96969
Re: Halal fees and terrorism funding
Reply #340 - Aug 29th, 2020 at 9:51pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 6:17pm:
FtKarnal wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 5:32pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:36pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:01pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:48pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:16pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 26th, 2020 at 9:33pm:
There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.


He's got you there, G.

FD? G's not allowed to say 0% of evidence, but the the old boy claims 0% of non evidence. Can we count that as 100% proof of evidence?




1.Muslims fund jihad.
2. Muslims fund jihad in clandestine/ illegal ways.
3. Many Muslim  charities are fronts for jihadi funding.
4. Muslim charity IS jihad.
5.  There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.
THEREFORE:
Some unknown proportion of halal certification, as of muslim charity funds, IS funding terrorism, aka jihad. Jihad in kuffar lands IS terrorism.


And yes, the old boy studied ethics at the prestigious University of Balogney.

Superior culture, innit.

It is.

You are not refuting my points, PB. No can do?  Go on, 10 rupee in it for you.



You haven't made a point to refute, you eminent graduate of the prestigious University of Balogney you.

The clearest thing you've said here is that your idiotic preening is superior to facts and evidence.

We'll leave that one to FD.

FD? Do you concur? Or would you prefer to wait for G to confess that he's forced to defend his fellow Muselman?

I have made 6 points, you refuted none of them.  I even numbered 5 of them.  You no can see?  Wanked yourself blind already?



Your 6 points can be summarised thus:

5.  There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.

They can be rebutted with the resounding assertion that there is no evidence to suggest that they are. G, your superior, has already pointed this out.

Now, if you'll excuse moi, I have to go have a wank. Will that be all?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 48607
Gender: male
Re: Halal fees and terrorism funding
Reply #341 - Aug 29th, 2020 at 10:06pm
 
UiKarnal wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 9:51pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 6:17pm:
FtKarnal wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 5:32pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:36pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:01pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:48pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:16pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 26th, 2020 at 9:33pm:
There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.


He's got you there, G.

FD? G's not allowed to say 0% of evidence, but the the old boy claims 0% of non evidence. Can we count that as 100% proof of evidence?




1.Muslims fund jihad.
2. Muslims fund jihad in clandestine/ illegal ways.
3. Many Muslim  charities are fronts for jihadi funding.
4. Muslim charity IS jihad.
5.  There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.
THEREFORE:
Some unknown proportion of halal certification, as of muslim charity funds, IS funding terrorism, aka jihad. Jihad in kuffar lands IS terrorism.


And yes, the old boy studied ethics at the prestigious University of Balogney.

Superior culture, innit.

It is.

You are not refuting my points, PB. No can do?  Go on, 10 rupee in it for you.



You haven't made a point to refute, you eminent graduate of the prestigious University of Balogney you.

The clearest thing you've said here is that your idiotic preening is superior to facts and evidence.

We'll leave that one to FD.

FD? Do you concur? Or would you prefer to wait for G to confess that he's forced to defend his fellow Muselman?

I have made 6 points, you refuted none of them.  I even numbered 5 of them.  You no can see?  Wanked yourself blind already?



Your 6 points can be summarised thus:

5.  There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.

They can be rebutted with the resounding assertion that there is no evidence to suggest that they are. G, your superior, has already pointed this out.

Now, if you'll excuse moi, I have to go have a wank. Will that be all?

So my 6 points are 1 point.
No wonder that your only response is to rush off to fap, and to hell with the 10 rupees.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96969
Re: Halal fees and terrorism funding
Reply #342 - Aug 29th, 2020 at 10:47pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 10:06pm:
UiKarnal wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 9:51pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 6:17pm:
FtKarnal wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 5:32pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:36pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:01pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:48pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:16pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 26th, 2020 at 9:33pm:
There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.


He's got you there, G.

FD? G's not allowed to say 0% of evidence, but the the old boy claims 0% of non evidence. Can we count that as 100% proof of evidence?




1.Muslims fund jihad.
2. Muslims fund jihad in clandestine/ illegal ways.
3. Many Muslim  charities are fronts for jihadi funding.
4. Muslim charity IS jihad.
5.  There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.
THEREFORE:
Some unknown proportion of halal certification, as of muslim charity funds, IS funding terrorism, aka jihad. Jihad in kuffar lands IS terrorism.


And yes, the old boy studied ethics at the prestigious University of Balogney.

Superior culture, innit.

It is.

You are not refuting my points, PB. No can do?  Go on, 10 rupee in it for you.



You haven't made a point to refute, you eminent graduate of the prestigious University of Balogney you.

The clearest thing you've said here is that your idiotic preening is superior to facts and evidence.

We'll leave that one to FD.

FD? Do you concur? Or would you prefer to wait for G to confess that he's forced to defend his fellow Muselman?

I have made 6 points, you refuted none of them.  I even numbered 5 of them.  You no can see?  Wanked yourself blind already?



Your 6 points can be summarised thus:

5.  There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.

They can be rebutted with the resounding assertion that there is no evidence to suggest that they are. G, your superior, has already pointed this out.

Now, if you'll excuse moi, I have to go have a wank. Will that be all?

So my 6 points are 1 point.
No wonder that your only response is to rush off to fap, and to hell with the 10 rupees.



Done. And you owe moi ten rupees.

I'll expect it on my desk first thing.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 48607
Gender: male
Re: Halal fees and terrorism funding
Reply #343 - Aug 30th, 2020 at 5:53pm
 
HuKarnal wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 9:51pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 6:17pm:
FtKarnal wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 5:32pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:36pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:01pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:48pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:16pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 26th, 2020 at 9:33pm:
There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.


He's got you there, G.

FD? G's not allowed to say 0% of evidence, but the the old boy claims 0% of non evidence. Can we count that as 100% proof of evidence?




1.Muslims fund jihad.
2. Muslims fund jihad in clandestine/ illegal ways.
3. Many Muslim  charities are fronts for jihadi funding.
4. Muslim charity IS jihad.
5.  There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.
THEREFORE:
Some unknown proportion of halal certification, as of muslim charity funds, IS funding terrorism, aka jihad. Jihad in kuffar lands IS terrorism.


And yes, the old boy studied ethics at the prestigious University of Balogney.

Superior culture, innit.

It is.

You are not refuting my points, PB. No can do?  Go on, 10 rupee in it for you.



You haven't made a point to refute, you eminent graduate of the prestigious University of Balogney you.

The clearest thing you've said here is that your idiotic preening is superior to facts and evidence.

We'll leave that one to FD.

FD? Do you concur? Or would you prefer to wait for G to confess that he's forced to defend his fellow Muselman?

I have made 6 points, you refuted none of them.  I even numbered 5 of them.  You no can see?  Wanked yourself blind already?



Your 6 points can be summarised thus:

5.  There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.

They can be rebutted with the resounding assertion that there is no evidence to suggest that they are. G, your superior, has already pointed this out.

Now, if you'll excuse moi, I have to go have a wank. Will that be all?

There IS evidence of Muslim charities serving as fronts for illegal purposes, including islamic jihad.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96969
Re: Halal fees and terrorism funding
Reply #344 - Aug 30th, 2020 at 9:00pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 30th, 2020 at 5:53pm:
HuKarnal wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 9:51pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 6:17pm:
FtKarnal wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 5:32pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:36pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 29th, 2020 at 2:01pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:48pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 27th, 2020 at 12:16pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 26th, 2020 at 9:33pm:
There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.


He's got you there, G.

FD? G's not allowed to say 0% of evidence, but the the old boy claims 0% of non evidence. Can we count that as 100% proof of evidence?




1.Muslims fund jihad.
2. Muslims fund jihad in clandestine/ illegal ways.
3. Many Muslim  charities are fronts for jihadi funding.
4. Muslim charity IS jihad.
5.  There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.
THEREFORE:
Some unknown proportion of halal certification, as of muslim charity funds, IS funding terrorism, aka jihad. Jihad in kuffar lands IS terrorism.


And yes, the old boy studied ethics at the prestigious University of Balogney.

Superior culture, innit.

It is.

You are not refuting my points, PB. No can do?  Go on, 10 rupee in it for you.



You haven't made a point to refute, you eminent graduate of the prestigious University of Balogney you.

The clearest thing you've said here is that your idiotic preening is superior to facts and evidence.

We'll leave that one to FD.

FD? Do you concur? Or would you prefer to wait for G to confess that he's forced to defend his fellow Muselman?

I have made 6 points, you refuted none of them.  I even numbered 5 of them.  You no can see?  Wanked yourself blind already?



Your 6 points can be summarised thus:

5.  There is no evidence that Muslims have processes to bar halal certification income from being chanelled to jihad.

They can be rebutted with the resounding assertion that there is no evidence to suggest that they are. G, your superior, has already pointed this out.

Now, if you'll excuse moi, I have to go have a wank. Will that be all?

There IS evidence of Muslim charities serving as fronts for illegal purposes, including islamic jihad.



FD? Do you uphold your right to support the old boy's porkies in his defence of white supremacy/correlation-not-causation/not racist/Islam is not a race?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 ... 35
Send Topic Print