Frank wrote on Sep 14^th, 2020 at 7:09pm:


You've lost me Frank.

Now you are saying not all charities are terrorists. How does that validate your assertion that halal certifiers must be sending at least some of their money to terrorists? Haven't you just opened up the possibility that they don't?

Oh dearie dearie me, tsk tsk, Y--A--W--N, what is all the fuss and bother?

muslims cut the clitoris out of little girls, muslims rape little girls with forced child marriage, muslims are the worlds' greatest terrorist threat, muslims have carried out over 37000 deadly terrorist attacks since September 11 2001, muslims rape, torture and kill people on a daily basis around the globe, muslims are responsible for the suicide jihadists etc. etc..

We all know that muslims would be very hypocritical and surreptitious when it comes to funding terrorism.

Buuttt there is one thing you can all rely on: muslims would never ever, under any circumstances, use halal fees to fund terrorism.

The troll under the railway bridge is thumping away on his portable piano.

Come on all together now, for the good ole moon god allah:

allahu akbar

pigs are going to fly tomorrow

cows are gunna jump over the moon

dishes will run away with all the spoons

the sun will rise in the west

cos allah knows best

polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 15^th, 2020 at 1:29pm:



Do kosher certification bodies send money to Jewish causes? Of course, naturally. The only difference is that Jewish causes are not illegal, like Islamic terrorism is.

Not to mention that you, a Muslim, don't think that Muslims 'fighting back' is terrorism. Paying Palestinian 'martyrs' families come under terrorism funding? Yes.

Foreign aid to the PA is funding terrorism, why wouldn't halal certification?  So if any money from hahal certification is sent to the Palestinian Authority, it is money funding terrorism.

And the PA is not the only shady outfit saddling the borders of legitimacy and terrorist organisation.

Frank wrote on Sep 15^th, 2020 at 6:35pm:


In your narrow, prejudicial mind I suppose this is perfectly logical.

It can only be achieved by assuming that 100% of muslims not only have sinister intentions, but fully intend to actively engage in real illegal activities (where possible).

You are seemingly incapable of recognising halal certification - or hell, lets just insert whatever revenue-generating activity engaged by muslims you like - for the simple thing that it is: business and enterprise. You know, that thing that our whole capitalistic society is largely built upon.

Is there anything special about halal certifiers that makes the especially guilty compared to other muslim-run businesses? Well you certainly haven't said. Presumably then they are just as guilty as Ahmed running his butcher shop in Lakemba, or the Turkish Pide house two blocks down. Are you going to run the same muslims = charity giver = misconstrued notion of 'charity' = sneaky, devious = THEREFORE TERRORIST FUNDER!! - schtick for them? Why not? They are no different in your mind. Hell, throw me in too - I earn money, I'm a muslim, I give to charity - THEREFORE GANDALF THE TERRORIST FUNDER!! I mean why the hell not - your template of "what halal certifiers do" is just the most blatant stereotype of the universal sinister muslim - applicable to literally any muslim you like.

Or are you going to attempt an actual argument for why halal certifiers, specifically, are necessarily an open-shut guilty case of terrorist funders? (and I'm generously assuming you don't actually believe the claptrap you insinuate that 100% of muslims fund terrorism)

freediver wrote on Sep 16^th, 2020 at 9:29pm:


Because its BS. Thought that would be obvious. You just pulled it out of your arse trying to pass it off as standard sinister muslim behaviour (apparently abu said it once - so naturally, universal muslim behaviour) - and attempted to use it as some kind of slur against me.

Then you inexplicably demand that I explain your own slur for you. Go figure. You'll do anything to endlessly deflect I suppose.

And speaking of slippery, any chance of answering my questions now? Take your time, but I think I've been extremely generous in patiently answering yours - regardless of how mindnumbingly stupid and irrelevant they are.

Quote:


The qur'an  is a sinister book if you are not a muslim.

Untold millions of rapes, tortures' and mass slaughters have taken place by muslims against the non muslims of the world, during the last 1400 odd years.

These atrocities have been conducted by muslims, who have done so with the clearest of conscience, because they 100% believe they have a sacred right to do so, as instructed in the qur'an.

The qur'an causes and motivates human rights atrocities against non muslims.

Every single muslim who supports the qur'an as infallible, perfect and can't be changed, supports the engendered human rights atrocities.

Sinister?

The cult islam and it's adherents, sinister to the core.

polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 16^th, 2020 at 10:40am:



Don't try to be sly and shifty. Don't try this lazy, stupid "100% of Muslims must be assumed to be [your crappy victim BS here].

It is perfectly logical, all you have to do is accept facts: NOT 100% of Muslims are law-abiding, NOT 100% of Muslims reject terrorism and jihad against non-Muslims and not all of these are on the radar.  This is how most money laundering happens. The Muslims have the additional cover of often operating outside the highly regulated and monitored Western banking system (which is still breaches).

Not even you can assure the world that 100% of Muslims involved in Muslims charities of any kind reject jihad and refuse to funnel funds to jihadi organisations like the PA, Hamas, and others, directly or indirectly. It would be like saying that there is no Mafia in America or Australia and all the Italians are completely transformed once they step outside Italy. Or that Muslim jihadis here and overseas have nuffin' to do wiv other Muslims in Australia or anywhere else.Ludicrous.i

polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 4:15pm:


No no, that's the old boy's version of tsk tsk tsk.

He just left out the eye rolls.