Australian Politics Forum - Court rules against Queensland taxis

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20492
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #45 - May 4^th, 2020 at 3:08pm

Bobby. wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:52pm:

Gordon wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:49pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:40pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:37pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:05pm:

Bobby, the Judgement is over about 50 pages. I have not yet read it to the extent I can nutshell it. Maybe later.

I await with bated breath.

Get fukked then.

Is that lawyer or taxi vernacular?

It's the drink.

[url]https://d2lnr5mha7bycj.cloudfront.net/product-image/file/large_13f8af40-16f0-468
c-83ef-
da300c6aa9f1.JPG[/url]

When the retard was pinned to a tree do you reckon he got a blast of booze breath?

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

cods Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 88048	Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis Reply #46 - May 4^th, 2020 at 4:14pm Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 12:03pm: freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 12:01pm: They operate by taking people's money off them. Yes, they do not work for nothing, Effendi, and they do not put their careers on the line by chasing rabbits down holes. I agree a very self satisfying career..
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74247
Gender: male

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #47 - May 4^th, 2020 at 5:49pm

Bobby. wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:48pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:40pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:37pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:05pm:

Bobby, the Judgement is over about 50 pages. I have not yet read it to the extent I can nutshell it. Maybe later.

I await with bated breath.

Get fukked then.

I could die of suffocation waiting for your learned appraisal.

easy fixed ... just take your boy friends ball sack out of your mouth while waiting

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #48 - May 4^th, 2020 at 5:57pm

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:05pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 12:27pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 12:03pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 12:01pm:

They operate by taking people's money off them.

Yes, they do not work for nothing, Effendi, and they do not put their careers on the line by chasing rabbits down holes.

Like they did with your money?

If they can make it sound plausible, they will do it. Even better if they have a customer who wants to take credit for it.

You are simplifying a complex issue Effendi, and I see no benefit in taking this any further with you.

Bobby, the Judgement is over about 50 pages. I have not yet read it to the extent I can nutshell it. Maybe later.

The outcome was that you pushed two items that otherwise would not have been pursued, paid a lot of money for the privilege, lost, were forced to pay court costs, probably cost your friends in the industry a lot of money too.

And here you are bragging about it.

Oh, and the lawyers got rich.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 74247 Gender:	Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis Reply #49 - May 4^th, 2020 at 5:59pm freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:57pm: The outcome was that you pushed two items that otherwise would not have been pursued pushed? where you there FD?
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103090
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #50 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:08pm

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:49pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:48pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:40pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:37pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:05pm:

Bobby, the Judgement is over about 50 pages. I have not yet read it to the extent I can nutshell it. Maybe later.

I await with bated breath.

Get fukked then.

I could die of suffocation waiting for your learned appraisal.

easy fixed ... just take your boy friends ball sack out of your mouth while waiting

You must be a homo.

Go to Monk's fake PA, gay forum.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38526
Gender: male

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #51 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:10pm

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:59pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:57pm:

The outcome was that you pushed two items that otherwise would not have been pursued

pushed? where you there FD? Cheesy

Correct, Mr Smith. This is how idiots take a simple comment and make it into something it never was.

At a meeting of Owners in Burpengarry, I spoke and said I thought we had an action based on contract and estoppel. Not one of those Victorian Lawyers were at that meeting. Fukked if I am going to give these stupid people any further oxygen, or detail. Look at what you get around here. You admit you had an idea which (at the moment) has been determined as wrong, and stupid dickheads pounce on that.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103090
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #52 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:15pm

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:10pm:

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:59pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:57pm:

The outcome was that you pushed two items that otherwise would not have been pursued

pushed? where you there FD? Cheesy

Correct, Mr Smith. This is how idiots take a simple comment and make it into something it never was.

At a meeting of Owners in Burpengarry, I spoke and said I thought we had an action based on contract and estoppel. Not one of those Victorian Lawyers were at that meeting. Fukked if I am going to give these stupid people any further oxygen, or detail. Look at what you get around here. You admit you had an idea which (at the moment) has been determined as wrong, and stupid dickheads pounce on that.

You certainly had a case for Promissory Estoppel.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74247
Gender: male

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #53 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:19pm

Bobby. wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:08pm:

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:49pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:48pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:40pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:37pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:05pm:

Bobby, the Judgement is over about 50 pages. I have not yet read it to the extent I can nutshell it. Maybe later.

I await with bated breath.

Get fukked then.

I could die of suffocation waiting for your learned appraisal.

easy fixed ... just take your boy friends ball sack out of your mouth while waiting

You must be a homo.

Go to Monk's fake PA, gay forum.

only time anyone mentions gays is when you're present. Be that here or at monks forum. What does that tell you? Cheesy

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103090
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #54 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:21pm

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:19pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:08pm:

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:49pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:48pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:40pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:37pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 2:05pm:

Bobby, the Judgement is over about 50 pages. I have not yet read it to the extent I can nutshell it. Maybe later.

I await with bated breath.

Get fukked then.

I could die of suffocation waiting for your learned appraisal.

easy fixed ... just take your boy friends ball sack out of your mouth while waiting

You must be a homo.

Go to Monk's fake PA, gay forum.

only time anyone mentions gays is when you're present. Be that here or at monks forum. What does that tell you? Cheesy

Go away John,
Monk will be happy to do all the cock talk you want -
not here - this is a forum for real men.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #55 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:23pm

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:10pm:

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:59pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:57pm:

The outcome was that you pushed two items that otherwise would not have been pursued

pushed? where you there FD? Cheesy

Correct, Mr Smith. This is how idiots take a simple comment and make it into something it never was.

At a meeting of Owners in Burpengarry, I spoke and said I thought we had an action based on contract and estoppel. Not one of those Victorian Lawyers were at that meeting. Fukked if I am going to give these stupid people any further oxygen, or detail. Look at what you get around here. You admit you had an idea which (at the moment) has been determined as wrong, and stupid dickheads pounce on that.

You had an idea and a pile of money, and gave both to the lawyers.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103090
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #56 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:25pm

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:23pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:10pm:

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:59pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:57pm:

The outcome was that you pushed two items that otherwise would not have been pursued

pushed? where you there FD? Cheesy

Correct, Mr Smith. This is how idiots take a simple comment and make it into something it never was.

At a meeting of Owners in Burpengarry, I spoke and said I thought we had an action based on contract and estoppel. Not one of those Victorian Lawyers were at that meeting. Fukked if I am going to give these stupid people any further oxygen, or detail. Look at what you get around here. You admit you had an idea which (at the moment) has been determined as wrong, and stupid dickheads pounce on that.

You had an idea and a pile of money, and gave both to the lawyers.

dear FD,
don't rub salt into the wound.
What happened to Aussie is not fair.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74247
Gender: male

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #57 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:26pm

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:23pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:10pm:

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:59pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:57pm:

The outcome was that you pushed two items that otherwise would not have been pursued

pushed? where you there FD? Cheesy

Correct, Mr Smith. This is how idiots take a simple comment and make it into something it never was.

At a meeting of Owners in Burpengarry, I spoke and said I thought we had an action based on contract and estoppel. Not one of those Victorian Lawyers were at that meeting. Fukked if I am going to give these stupid people any further oxygen, or detail. Look at what you get around here. You admit you had an idea which (at the moment) has been determined as wrong, and stupid dickheads pounce on that.

You had an idea and a pile of money, and gave both to the lawyers.

the same applies to everyone suing someone else fd ... is there a point you're trying to make?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #58 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:29pm

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:26pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:23pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:10pm:

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:59pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:57pm:

The outcome was that you pushed two items that otherwise would not have been pursued

pushed? where you there FD? Cheesy

Correct, Mr Smith. This is how idiots take a simple comment and make it into something it never was.

At a meeting of Owners in Burpengarry, I spoke and said I thought we had an action based on contract and estoppel. Not one of those Victorian Lawyers were at that meeting. Fukked if I am going to give these stupid people any further oxygen, or detail. Look at what you get around here. You admit you had an idea which (at the moment) has been determined as wrong, and stupid dickheads pounce on that.

You had an idea and a pile of money, and gave both to the lawyers.

the same applies to everyone suing someone else fd ... is there a point you're trying to make?

Just trying to figure out what Aussie is bragging about.

Not everyone suing someone gives their lawyers bright ideas on how to take their money.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 74247 Gender:	Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis Reply #59 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:32pm freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:29pm: Just trying to figure out what Aussie is bragging about how is it bragging? freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:29pm: Not everyone suing someone gives their lawyers bright ideas on how to take their money. it was a meeting of owners.
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged