Australian Politics Forum - Court rules against Queensland taxis

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 48833 At my desk.	Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis Reply #60 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:35pm Aussie went to great pains to point out that it was his idea and the bigshot lawyers agreed with him and said they would have never thought of it themselves.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20488 Gordon Gender:	Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis Reply #61 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:36pm freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:35pm: Aussie went to great pains to point out that it was his idea and the bigshot lawyers agreed with him and said they would have never thought of it themselves. Is there some kind of a conflict of interest there?
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74239
Gender: male

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #62 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:36pm

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:35pm:

Aussie went to great pains to point out that it was his idea and the bigshot lawyers agreed with him and said they would have never thought of it themselves.

you're going to great pains to pretend aussie said something other than what he said

does that mean you're bragging now? Cheesy

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #63 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:42pm

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:36pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:35pm:

Aussie went to great pains to point out that it was his idea and the bigshot lawyers agreed with him and said they would have never thought of it themselves.

you're going to great pains to pretend aussie said something other than what he said

does that mean you're bragging now? Cheesy

hu hum'

he did say that Roll Eyes

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #17 - May 2nd, 2020 at 1:13pmQuote Tell that to the Judge. And......

I would have been taking the credit has those two dismissed parts of the Claim got through. They were my idea (expressed at a meeting Owners had in Burpengary Qld about two years) with which the clever dick QCs and Lawyers in Victoria agreed, but they did not come up with those themselves.

The one that did get through, was not my idea but I agree with it.

Back to top

IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 18292
Gender: male

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #64 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:43pm

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:23pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:10pm:

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:59pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:57pm:

The outcome was that you pushed two items that otherwise would not have been pursued

pushed? where you there FD? Cheesy

Correct, Mr Smith. This is how idiots take a simple comment and make it into something it never was.

At a meeting of Owners in Burpengarry, I spoke and said I thought we had an action based on contract and estoppel. Not one of those Victorian Lawyers were at that meeting. Fukked if I am going to give these stupid people any further oxygen, or detail. Look at what you get around here. You admit you had an idea which (at the moment) has been determined as wrong, and stupid dickheads pounce on that.

You had an idea and a pile of money, and gave both to the lawyers.

I told Arsie to sell his taxi plates years ago while they were still worth something.

Now his plates have lost heaps of value and he has to pay his lawyer and the government lawyers.

Grin

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #65 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:45pm

Baronvonrort wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:43pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:23pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:10pm:

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:59pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:57pm:

The outcome was that you pushed two items that otherwise would not have been pursued

pushed? where you there FD? Cheesy

Correct, Mr Smith. This is how idiots take a simple comment and make it into something it never was.

At a meeting of Owners in Burpengarry, I spoke and said I thought we had an action based on contract and estoppel. Not one of those Victorian Lawyers were at that meeting. Fukked if I am going to give these stupid people any further oxygen, or detail. Look at what you get around here. You admit you had an idea which (at the moment) has been determined as wrong, and stupid dickheads pounce on that.

You had an idea and a pile of money, and gave both to the lawyers.

I told Arsie to sell his taxi plates years ago while they were still worth something.

Now his plates have lost heaps of value and he has to pay his lawyer and the government lawyers.

Grin

it isnt the fact they have lost value every businessman takes that risk..

its the fact the opposition doesnt play by the same rules as taxi owners play by...

if you owned a pub and someone opened another pub opposite you.. they would have to pay the same licence fees...and play by the same rules as you..

not so in this case.. and that imo is unfair..

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 48833 At my desk.	Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis Reply #66 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:49pm John why are you so eager to validate Aussie's efforts to get himself and his friends fleeced by lawyers?
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103049
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #67 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:50pm

cods wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:45pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:43pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:23pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:10pm:

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:59pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:57pm:

The outcome was that you pushed two items that otherwise would not have been pursued

pushed? where you there FD? Cheesy

Correct, Mr Smith. This is how idiots take a simple comment and make it into something it never was.

At a meeting of Owners in Burpengarry, I spoke and said I thought we had an action based on contract and estoppel. Not one of those Victorian Lawyers were at that meeting. Fukked if I am going to give these stupid people any further oxygen, or detail. Look at what you get around here. You admit you had an idea which (at the moment) has been determined as wrong, and stupid dickheads pounce on that.

You had an idea and a pile of money, and gave both to the lawyers.

I told Arsie to sell his taxi plates years ago while they were still worth something.

Now his plates have lost heaps of value and he has to pay his lawyer and the government lawyers.

Grin

it isnt the fact they have lost value every businessman takes that risk..

its the fact the opposition doesnt play by the same rules as taxi owners play by...

if you owned a pub and someone opened another pub opposite you.. they would have to pay the same licence fees...and play by the same rules as you..

not so in this case.. and that imo is unfair..

True - Aussie has been shafted by The Govt.

Back to top

IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 18292
Gender: male

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #68 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:52pm

cods wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:45pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:43pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:23pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:10pm:

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:59pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:57pm:

The outcome was that you pushed two items that otherwise would not have been pursued

pushed? where you there FD? Cheesy

Correct, Mr Smith. This is how idiots take a simple comment and make it into something it never was.

At a meeting of Owners in Burpengarry, I spoke and said I thought we had an action based on contract and estoppel. Not one of those Victorian Lawyers were at that meeting. Fukked if I am going to give these stupid people any further oxygen, or detail. Look at what you get around here. You admit you had an idea which (at the moment) has been determined as wrong, and stupid dickheads pounce on that.

You had an idea and a pile of money, and gave both to the lawyers.

I told Arsie to sell his taxi plates years ago while they were still worth something.

Now his plates have lost heaps of value and he has to pay his lawyer and the government lawyers.

Grin

it isnt the fact they have lost value every businessman takes that risk..

its the fact the opposition doesnt play by the same rules as taxi owners play by...

if you owned a pub and someone opened another pub opposite you.. they would have to pay the same licence fees...and play by the same rules as you..

not so in this case.. and that imo is unfair..

If taxis were good value there is no way companies like Uber would have been a threat.

Times change and so do the rules many people have lost money in the past by not adapting to newer times with different rules.

If I was stupid enough to invest in taxi plate I would have sold it when Uber started when the plate still had some value.

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #69 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:53pm

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:49pm:

John why are you so eager to validate Aussie's efforts to get himself and his friends fleeced by lawyers?

gawd your a stirrer fd......what does js or you for that matter know about legal issues.... Roll Eyes

..

we need to await aussies explanation why they were thrown out....

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #70 - May 4^th, 2020 at 6:58pm

Baronvonrort wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:52pm:

cods wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:45pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:43pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:23pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:10pm:

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:59pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:57pm:

The outcome was that you pushed two items that otherwise would not have been pursued

pushed? where you there FD? Cheesy

Correct, Mr Smith. This is how idiots take a simple comment and make it into something it never was.

At a meeting of Owners in Burpengarry, I spoke and said I thought we had an action based on contract and estoppel. Not one of those Victorian Lawyers were at that meeting. Fukked if I am going to give these stupid people any further oxygen, or detail. Look at what you get around here. You admit you had an idea which (at the moment) has been determined as wrong, and stupid dickheads pounce on that.

You had an idea and a pile of money, and gave both to the lawyers.

I told Arsie to sell his taxi plates years ago while they were still worth something.

Now his plates have lost heaps of value and he has to pay his lawyer and the government lawyers.

Grin

it isnt the fact they have lost value every businessman takes that risk..

its the fact the opposition doesnt play by the same rules as taxi owners play by...

if you owned a pub and someone opened another pub opposite you.. they would have to pay the same licence fees...and play by the same rules as you..

not so in this case.. and that imo is unfair..

If taxis were good value there is no way companies like Uber would have been a threat.

Times change and so do the rules many people have lost money in the past by not adapting to newer times with different rules.

If I was stupid enough to invest in taxi plate I would have sold it when Uber started when the plate still had some value.

well we can all think like that others would be hoping UBER would flop and disappear all together..

all I say is... it should be a level playing field.....you cant stop competition ... but UBER is getting away with murder.. in fact its a bloody joke....one rule for them and one rule for cabbies.......nah it stinks.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20488
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #71 - May 4^th, 2020 at 7:00pm

Baronvonrort wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:52pm:

cods wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:45pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:43pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:23pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:10pm:

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:59pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:57pm:

The outcome was that you pushed two items that otherwise would not have been pursued

pushed? where you there FD? Cheesy

Correct, Mr Smith. This is how idiots take a simple comment and make it into something it never was.

At a meeting of Owners in Burpengarry, I spoke and said I thought we had an action based on contract and estoppel. Not one of those Victorian Lawyers were at that meeting. Fukked if I am going to give these stupid people any further oxygen, or detail. Look at what you get around here. You admit you had an idea which (at the moment) has been determined as wrong, and stupid dickheads pounce on that.

You had an idea and a pile of money, and gave both to the lawyers.

I told Arsie to sell his taxi plates years ago while they were still worth something.

Now his plates have lost heaps of value and he has to pay his lawyer and the government lawyers.

Grin

it isnt the fact they have lost value every businessman takes that risk..

its the fact the opposition doesnt play by the same rules as taxi owners play by...

if you owned a pub and someone opened another pub opposite you.. they would have to pay the same licence fees...and play by the same rules as you..

not so in this case.. and that imo is unfair..

If taxis were good value there is no way companies like Uber would have been a threat.

Times change and so do the rules many people have lost money in the past by not adapting to newer times with different rules.

If I was stupid enough to invest in taxi plate I would have sold it when Uber started when the plate still had some value.

All taxis needed to do was improve their product.
Clean cabs, knowledge polite drivers, arrive on time, did I say clean cabs? Even today your average Sydney cab stinks.

No sympathy for a business that can't adapt.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20488
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #72 - May 4^th, 2020 at 7:02pm

cods wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:58pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:52pm:

cods wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:45pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:43pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:23pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:10pm:

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:59pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:57pm:

The outcome was that you pushed two items that otherwise would not have been pursued

pushed? where you there FD? Cheesy

Correct, Mr Smith. This is how idiots take a simple comment and make it into something it never was.

At a meeting of Owners in Burpengarry, I spoke and said I thought we had an action based on contract and estoppel. Not one of those Victorian Lawyers were at that meeting. Fukked if I am going to give these stupid people any further oxygen, or detail. Look at what you get around here. You admit you had an idea which (at the moment) has been determined as wrong, and stupid dickheads pounce on that.

You had an idea and a pile of money, and gave both to the lawyers.

I told Arsie to sell his taxi plates years ago while they were still worth something.

Now his plates have lost heaps of value and he has to pay his lawyer and the government lawyers.

Grin

it isnt the fact they have lost value every businessman takes that risk..

its the fact the opposition doesnt play by the same rules as taxi owners play by...

if you owned a pub and someone opened another pub opposite you.. they would have to pay the same licence fees...and play by the same rules as you..

not so in this case.. and that imo is unfair..

If taxis were good value there is no way companies like Uber would have been a threat.

Times change and so do the rules many people have lost money in the past by not adapting to newer times with different rules.

If I was stupid enough to invest in taxi plate I would have sold it when Uber started when the plate still had some value.

well we can all think like that others would be hoping UBER would flop and disappear all together..

all I say is... it should be a level playing field.....you cant stop competition ... but UBER is getting away with murder.. in fact its a bloody joke....one rule for them and one rule for cabbies.......nah it stinks.

Uber can't line up at taxi ranks or pick up flag calls.
They still have protection.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #73 - May 4^th, 2020 at 7:10pm

Gordon wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 7:00pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:52pm:

cods wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:45pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:43pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:23pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:10pm:

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:59pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:57pm:

The outcome was that you pushed two items that otherwise would not have been pursued

pushed? where you there FD? Cheesy

Correct, Mr Smith. This is how idiots take a simple comment and make it into something it never was.

At a meeting of Owners in Burpengarry, I spoke and said I thought we had an action based on contract and estoppel. Not one of those Victorian Lawyers were at that meeting. Fukked if I am going to give these stupid people any further oxygen, or detail. Look at what you get around here. You admit you had an idea which (at the moment) has been determined as wrong, and stupid dickheads pounce on that.

You had an idea and a pile of money, and gave both to the lawyers.

I told Arsie to sell his taxi plates years ago while they were still worth something.

Now his plates have lost heaps of value and he has to pay his lawyer and the government lawyers.

Grin

it isnt the fact they have lost value every businessman takes that risk..

its the fact the opposition doesnt play by the same rules as taxi owners play by...

if you owned a pub and someone opened another pub opposite you.. they would have to pay the same licence fees...and play by the same rules as you..

not so in this case.. and that imo is unfair..

If taxis were good value there is no way companies like Uber would have been a threat.

Times change and so do the rules many people have lost money in the past by not adapting to newer times with different rules.

If I was stupid enough to invest in taxi plate I would have sold it when Uber started when the plate still had some value.

All taxis needed to do was improve their product.
Clean cabs, knowledge polite drivers, arrive on time, did I say clean cabs? Even today your average Sydney cab stinks.

No sympathy for a business that can't adapt.

not all ... come on gordy if you had a bad experience you can report it....in my experience never had a dirty ride...... maybe look at the driver....oopps then again maybe not... Undecided

Gordon wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 7:02pm:

Uber can't line up at taxi ranks or pick up flag calls.
They still have protection

for NOW....still not a level playing field though is it???

and isnt UBER foreign owned.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20488
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Court rules against Queensland taxis
Reply #74 - May 4^th, 2020 at 7:13pm

cods wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 7:10pm:

Gordon wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 7:00pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:52pm:

cods wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:45pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:43pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:23pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 6:10pm:

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:59pm:

freediver wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 5:57pm:

The outcome was that you pushed two items that otherwise would not have been pursued

pushed? where you there FD? Cheesy

Correct, Mr Smith. This is how idiots take a simple comment and make it into something it never was.

At a meeting of Owners in Burpengarry, I spoke and said I thought we had an action based on contract and estoppel. Not one of those Victorian Lawyers were at that meeting. Fukked if I am going to give these stupid people any further oxygen, or detail. Look at what you get around here. You admit you had an idea which (at the moment) has been determined as wrong, and stupid dickheads pounce on that.

You had an idea and a pile of money, and gave both to the lawyers.

I told Arsie to sell his taxi plates years ago while they were still worth something.

Now his plates have lost heaps of value and he has to pay his lawyer and the government lawyers.

Grin

it isnt the fact they have lost value every businessman takes that risk..

its the fact the opposition doesnt play by the same rules as taxi owners play by...

if you owned a pub and someone opened another pub opposite you.. they would have to pay the same licence fees...and play by the same rules as you..

not so in this case.. and that imo is unfair..

If taxis were good value there is no way companies like Uber would have been a threat.

Times change and so do the rules many people have lost money in the past by not adapting to newer times with different rules.

If I was stupid enough to invest in taxi plate I would have sold it when Uber started when the plate still had some value.

All taxis needed to do was improve their product.
Clean cabs, knowledge polite drivers, arrive on time, did I say clean cabs? Even today your average Sydney cab stinks.

No sympathy for a business that can't adapt.

not all ... come on gordy if you had a bad experience you can report it....in my experience never had a dirty ride...... maybe look at the driver....oopps then again maybe not... Undecided

Gordon wrote on May 4^th, 2020 at 7:02pm:

Uber can't line up at taxi ranks or pick up flag calls.
They still have protection

for NOW....still not a level playing field though is it???

and isnt UBER foreign owned.

Cods, taxis in Sydney have always been a schitshow, it's no wonder people love Uber.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged