Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Hong Kong (Read 1506 times)
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11777
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: Hong Kong
Reply #15 - Jun 2nd, 2020 at 7:10am
 
Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on May 26th, 2020 at 11:36pm:


look at every other upstart with a chip on the shoulder who's taken on the might of the Civilised World...



Britain had a chip about Henry VIII's pope and the Spanish gold. They went to Asia to steal more from the Portuguese and Spanish Empires. Later they were locked-down at Port Jackson and found more gold , stole from Chinese gold-miners and flogged iron to China. They might be civilised.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 49160
Gender: male
Re: Hong Kong
Reply #16 - Jun 2nd, 2020 at 7:42am
 
Britain got it right in North America & Sahul and South America and had 'Lawrence' in the Middle-East.

But in Africa, Asia - they got it wrong.
And they will eventually get it wrong in Europe too - unlike Germany, soon France and then Italy who forfeit their Colonies to get it right.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11777
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: Hong Kong
Reply #17 - Jun 2nd, 2020 at 5:32pm
 
Until the French revolution the British monarch was crowned as king of France.  It's still British territory by conquest and common sense, and French natives soon learn English.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Deep State Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 85050
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: Hong Kong
Reply #18 - Jun 2nd, 2020 at 7:28pm
 
chimera wrote on Jun 2nd, 2020 at 5:32pm:
Until the French revolution the British monarch was crowned as king of France.  It's still British territory by conquest and common sense, and French natives soon learn English.


Louis the Sixteenth was the King of France,
In seventeen eighty nine,
He was worse than Louis the Fourteenth
He was worse than Louis the Fifteenth,
He was the worst,
Since Louis the first..

Well - he sure weren't George III - aye, The Madness of King George...
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Cofgod
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 693
Bolton, Great Britain
Gender: male
Re: Hong Kong
Reply #19 - Jun 17th, 2020 at 4:57am
 
chimera wrote on Jun 2nd, 2020 at 5:32pm:
Until the French revolution the British monarch was crowned as king of France.  It's still British territory by conquest and common sense, and French natives soon learn English.


You're right.

The last British monarch to claim the title of “King of France” was George III. He stopped using the title on 31st December 1800, and the claim to the French throne was officially dropped in 1802.

The British still did this despite the fact the English lost the Hundred Years War where they attempted, and failed, to conquer large swathes of France and claim the French crown for Edward III.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print