polite_gandalf wrote on Aug 4
th, 2020 at 2:00pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 31
st, 2020 at 4:55pm:
It was already illegal. Yet somehow it went ahead with the Victorian government asking them nicely nice to go.
I don't know if they were technically illegal or not. What I do know is that you originally said the government "condoned" the protests, and are now trying to shift the goalposts after being proven wrong.
freediver wrote on Jul 31
st, 2020 at 4:55pm:
Including the earlier BLM protests?
Of course. But being a bad idea in terms of risking the spread of infection doesn't mean it actually did spread the infection.
It was contrary to the rules in place, rules brought in legislatively. You know, lawfully.
But woke bedwetting-yet-jihadi ijits like you and this woman and hundreds of others shouted about 'wacism' is a gweater thweat than Covid-19" and Victoria, being run by a woke fapper, bent its OWN rules to not enforce them if you broke them for BLM idiocy reasons.
PC kills. We see it now every day.
https://theconversation.com/profiles/lakshmi-manoharan-1014558https://theconversation.com/why-protesting-racism-during-a-pandemic-is-important...https://theintercept.com/2020/06/11/systemic-racism-protests-coronavirus-health-...Either we are all equal under the law or we are not (your jihadi angle). If the law is an ass and the rules are arbitrary, you change them first. You don't disobey them because of your woke/jihadi/wace-baiting moral preening - and then insist that everyone ELSE obey them.
You are not a libertarian advocating that all rule be ignored. You are opportunistic jihadi advocating the destruction of the equality of all before the law because it is an idea completely non-compliant with your plan to have Islamic rule across the face of the earth.
You cannot be, and so you are not, a liberal Muslim who want a democratic, open, enlightened-yet-Muslim society. You are not stupid enough to spend your life on a contradiction and impossibility.