freediver wrote on Jul 11
th, 2021 at 10:33am:
It is anti-religious by definition. It only exists as a reaction to religion.
That depends on your definition of Atheism. Many see it as an absence of belief in deities.
An absence of belief doesn't require the presence of belief to exist. An absence of belief is passive, and is not a reaction against anything.
freediver wrote on Jul 11
th, 2021 at 10:33am:
If you wanted to be an antheist in a world without religion, you would fist have to invent a religion to not believe in.
Before religion was invented by humans some time in the stone age as an attempt to explain the world, it was effectively an atheist world.
Jasin wrote on Mar 21
st, 2021 at 10:12pm:
Atheism started as an ANTI religious movement, nothing more.
It knew what it was against, but still doesn't know what it's for.
At the most, the odd black-skivvy, shaved head, cafe-latte sipping, Paddington living, Media-loving man with an interest in Science instead (because he had to belong to someone, if not Religion).
Atheism isn't a "movement" and it is not a "belief"
There is no ideology or code of conduct that atheists adhere to.
"Atheist" is purely a label given to differentiate them from Theists.